IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05583293.html

Cooking for transitioning : a study of social restaurant scaling process

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Denos

    (IAE Angers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Angers - UA - Université d'Angers, GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

  • Mathias Guérineau

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Nantes Univ - IAE Nantes - Nantes Université - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université, CRG I3 - Centre de Recherche en Gestion I3 - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Etienne Capron

    (DRM - MLAB - Dauphine Recherches en Management - MLAB - DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Faced with grand challenges and complex problems, society urgently needs to develop alternative solutions to transition toward a more sustainable model. Among these challenges, food is at the forefront. To tackle the challenge of transitioning toward a sustainable food system, some actors are seeking to develop alternative food systems, referring to actors and initiatives aimed at creating new relationships between producers and consumers, in opposition to intensive agriculture and the domination of multinationals (Michel, 2019).Addressing these major challenges often involves transformative social innovations. This term describe these "shared activities, ideas and objects across locally rooted sustainability initiatives that explore and develop alternatives to incumbent and (perceived) unsustainable regimes that they seek to challenge, alter or replace" (Loorbach et al., 2020, p. 254). Empirical cases of solutions at different stages of the food chain have been explored in the literature (e.g. Colombo et al., 2023; Michel, 2019). More generally, the literature has shown that transformative social innovations are generally seen as emerging from a local problem identified by actors in a region (Mazzei, 2017). However, relatively similar solutions are used in different regions. For example, different models of energy cooperatives exist in different European countries, and even within the same country with nuances depending on the region (Baileche et al., 2024; Bauwens et al., 2020; Geskus et al., 2024). Remains one persistent question : how to scale these innovations.To contrast with conventional definitions of scaling, where the objective is the organization's economic growth, researchers have developed a framework in which scaling refers to maximizing the impact of the organization and its social and environmental mission (Colombo et al., 2023). Different types of scaling routes have been identified theoretically and empirically (e.g. Bauwens et al., 2020; Colombo et al., 2023; Westley et al., 2014). These studies show that scaling is a temporal process, which follows an evolutionary and non-linear This work is in line with the multi-scale perspective of transition processes (Binz et al., 2020; Coenen et al., 2012) to better understand how transformative social innovations develop within and between regions. We contribute to a better understanding of the scaling process of transformative social innovations in two ways. First, by reversing the perspective to the actors who adopt and implement social innovations locally, we extend the actors to be considered and highlight a process that is not unidirectional, but can come from the intentions, resources and actions of actors who adopt and translate innovations. Second, by studying how organizations implement transformative social innovation through placemaking (Cartel et al., 2022; Fohim et al., 2024), we explore how local and extra-local resources are combined to connect their organisation to the local context and materialise in a place.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Denos & Mathias Guérineau & Etienne Capron, 2025. "Cooking for transitioning : a study of social restaurant scaling process," Post-Print hal-05583293, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05583293
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05583293v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05583293v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navé Wald & Douglas Hill, 2016. "‘Rescaling’ alternative food systems: from food security to food sovereignty," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 203-213, March.
    2. Paul Shrivastava & James Kenelly, 2013. "Sustainability and Place-Based Enterprise," Post-Print hal-01514515, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:journl:hal-04683533 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Lea Baileche & Magalie Marais & Florence Palpacuer, 2024. "Tensions Between Local Embeddedness and Scaling up: Insights from Grassroots Sustainability Initiatives in the Renewable Energy Transition," Post-Print hal-04680879, HAL.
    5. Paul Shrivastava & James Kenelly, 2013. "Sustainability and Place-Based Enterprise," Post-Print hal-01515221, HAL.
    6. Sophie Michel, 2020. "Collaborative institutional work to generate alternative food systems," Post-Print hal-03693596, HAL.
    7. Ron Boschma, 2004. "Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1001-1014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muñoz, Pablo & Cohen, Boyd, 2017. "Towards a social-ecological understanding of sustainable venturing," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Howard, Mickey & Böhm, Steffen & Eatherley, Dan, 2022. "Systems resilience and SME multilevel challenges: A place-based conceptualization of the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 757-768.
    3. Tello, Mario A., 2020. "Conceptualizing social impact: A geographic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 562-571.
    4. Raimi, Daniel & Barone, Aurora & Carley, Sanya & Foster, David & Grubert, Emily & Haggerty, Julia & Higdon, Jake & Kearney, Michael & Konisky, David & Michael, Jennifer & Michaud, Gilbert & Nabahe, Sa, 2021. "Policy Options to Enable an Equitable Energy Transition," RFF Reports 21-09, Resources for the Future.
    5. Kibler, Ewald & Fink, Matthias & Lang, Richard & Muñoz, Pablo, 2015. "Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 24-29.
    6. Farhana Ferdousi & Nuren Abedin, 2023. "Strategic Human Resources Management for Creating Shared Value in Social Business Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Margo P. M. Enthoven & Aleid E. Brouwer, 2020. "Investigating spatial concentration of sustainable restaurants: It is all about good food!," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 575-594, June.
    8. Hannia Gonzalez-Urango & Enrique Mu, 2025. "Entrepreneurship centers in the development of sustainable innovation: two country perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2020. "The Corporate Shared Value for Sustainable Development: An Ecosystem Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Natalie Slawinski & Pratima Bansal, 2015. "Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 531-549, April.
    11. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Russo, Michael V. & Earle, Andrew G. & Lahneman, Brooke A. & Tilleman, Suzanne G., 2022. "Taking root in fertile ground: Community context and the agglomeration of hybrid companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2).
    13. Tobias Gössling & Konstantinos Pitsakis, 2026. "Regional institutions and place-based practice adoption: the forest stewardship council certificate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1513-1540, May.
    14. Bruno Dyck & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2021. "Sustainable marketing based on virtue ethics: addressing socio-ecological challenges facing humankind," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 115-132, June.
    15. Laurent Mermet & C. Feger, 2022. "New Business Models for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Services: An Action Research With a Large Environmental Sector Company," Post-Print hal-02976891, HAL.
    16. Vesela Veleva & Shelby Amsel, 2025. "The Role of Technical Assistance and Recognition in Promoting Pollution Prevention and Sustainability Among Craft Breweries: Lessons from Massachusetts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    17. André O’Neill & Alvaro Dias & Mafalda Patuleia & Leandro Pereira, 2022. "Financial Objectives and Satisfaction with Life: A Mixed-Method Study in Surf Lifestyle Entrepreneurs," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Khurshid, Hamid & Snell, Robin Stanley, 2021. "Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-133.
    19. Álvaro Dias & Graça M. Silva, 2021. "Willingness to Stay of Tourism Lifestyle Entrepreneurs: A Configurational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05583293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.