IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05053919.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

« En quoi la pratique des exercices spirituels permet-elle de clarifier la vision stratégique ? »

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Boule

    (EOLE - Environnement Organisation LEgislation (ex LITHORAL, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Territoire Histoire Organisation RégulAtion Loi) - ULR - La Rochelle Université, ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

Les dirigeants de PME font face à un environnement stratégique complexe et incertain, dont les contours du futur sont anxiogènes et ambigus. L'avenir s'est transformé aujourd'hui en une pratique risquée et contestée. Les dirigeants cherchent des moyens supplétifs pour orienter leur avenir. S'exercer à la pratique des exercices spirituels, c'est utiliser une boite à outils visant à travailler sur soi afin de clarifier quotidiennement les actions à entreprendre. Il s'agit d'entraîner l'esprit à un mode de vie philosophique, à une transformation de soi pour prendre conscience de ses marges de manœuvre et favoriser à mieux clarifier la signification des évènements ainsi que d'y voir plus clair sur le chemin à suivre. Comment, dès lors, la pratique des exercices spirituels, en tant que technique de soi favorisant la réflexivité, peut-elle accompagner les dirigeants dans ce processus de clarification, en transformant leur représentation mentale et en leur permettant d'élaborer une vision stratégique à la fois créative, structurée et adaptée aux enjeux de l'avenir ?

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Boule, 2025. "« En quoi la pratique des exercices spirituels permet-elle de clarifier la vision stratégique ? »," Post-Print hal-05053919, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05053919
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05053919v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05053919v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9494 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Louis Jacques Filion & Edmilson Lima, 2011. "Le partage de la vision dans les très petites entreprises," Entreprendre & innover, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 7-20.
    3. John Hendry & David Seidl, 2003. "The Structure and Significance of Strategic Episodes: Social Systems Theory and the Routine Practices of Strategic Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 175-196, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elbasha, Tamim & Avetisyan, Emma, 2018. "A framework to study strategizing activities at the field level: The example of CSR rating agencies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 38-46.
    2. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    3. Brorström, Sara, 2017. "The paradoxes of city strategy practice: Why some issues become strategically important and others do not," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 213-221.
    4. Lionel Garreau & Raphaël Maucuer, 2015. "The mise-en-sens tactics of civil society organizations to influence strategy," Post-Print hal-01787991, HAL.
    5. Yi Jiang & Charles-Clemens Rüling, 2019. "Opening the Black Box of Effectuation Processes: Characteristics and Dominant Types," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 171-202, January.
    6. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Rasche, Andreas & Seidl, David, 2020. "A Luhmannian perspective on strategy: Strategy as paradox and meta-communication," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Philip Gylfe & Henrika Franck & Curtis Lebaron & Saku Mantere, 2016. "Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 133-148, January.
    9. Dominik Aaken & Clemens Koob & Katja Rost & David Seidl, 2013. "Ausgestaltung und Erfolg von Strategieworkshops: eine empirische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 588-616, November.
    10. Valérie-Inès de La Ville & Eléonore Mounoud, 2010. "A Narrative Approach to Strategy as Practice: strategy making from texts and narratives," Post-Print hal-01627965, HAL.
    11. Katharina Dittrich & Stéphane Guérard & David Seidl, 2016. "Talking About Routines: The Role of Reflective Talk in Routine Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 678-697, June.
    12. Samir Akachi & Arbia Ayed, 2021. "The Acceptance of E-learning as a Tool for Teaching Entrepreneurship during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Case of HITS of Sidi Bouzid and Ksar Hellal -Tunisia," Studies in Educational Management, EUROKD, vol. 10, pages 1-17.
    13. Valérie-Inés de la Ville & Eléonore Mounoud, 2015. "A Narrative Approach to Strategy as Practice," Post-Print hal-01377985, HAL.
    14. Vos, J.P., 2003. "Observing Suppliers observing Early Supplier Involvement: An Empirical Research based upon the Social Systems Theory of Niklas Luhmann," Working Papers 03.09, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    15. MacIntosh, Robert & MacLean, Donald & Seidl, David, 2008. "Strategy Workshops and Strategic Change," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 2145, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    16. Lee, Kenneth & Aleksanyan, Mark & Harris, Elaine & Manochin, Melina, 2023. "Throwing in the towel: what happens when analysts' recommendations go wrong?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Pünchera, Ventana Rebecca, 2021. "The Exercise of Power in Strategy Meetings: A Comparison of Political Behavior in Online and Offline Meetings," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(4), pages 852-890.
    18. Leonardo Lemos da Silveira Santos & César Tureta & Bruno Felix, 2021. "A Qualitative Method Proposal for the Study of Strategy as Practice," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(2), pages 190353-1903.
    19. Sminia, Harry & Ates, Aylin & Paton, Steve & Smith, Marisa, 2019. "High value manufacturing: Capability, appropriation, and governance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 516-528.
    20. van Assche, Kristof & Valentinov, Vladislav & Verschraegen, Gert, 2022. "Adaptive governance: Learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(5), pages 1738-1758.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05053919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.