IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/251561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive governance: Learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play

Author

Listed:
  • van Assche, Kristof
  • Valentinov, Vladislav
  • Verschraegen, Gert

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of adaptive governance, which is advocated for as a manner to deal with dramatic changes in society and/or environment. To re-think the possible contributions of organizations and organization theory, to adaptive governance. Design/methodology/approach: Based on social systems theory this study makes a distinction between "governance organizations" and "governance communities." Organizations are conceptualized as the decision machines which organize and (co-)steer governance. Communities are seen as the social environments against which the governance system orients its operations. This study considers the adaptive mechanisms of organizations and reflect on the roles of organizations to enhance adaptive governance in communities and societies. Findings: Diverse types of organizations can link or couple in different ways to communities in their social environment. Such links can enhance the coordinative capacity of the governance system and can also spur innovation to enable adaptation. Yet, linking with communities can also slow down responses to change and complexify the processes of deliberation in governance. Not all adaptive mechanisms available to organizations can be used in communicating with communities or can be institutionalized, but the continuous innovation in the field of organizations can inspire continuous testing of small-scale adaptive mechanisms at higher levels. Society can thus enhance its adaptive capacity by managing the role of organizations. Originality/value: The harnessing of insights in organization theory and systems theory for improving understanding of adaptive governance. The finding that both experiment and coordination at societal level are needed, toward adaptive governance, and that organizations can contribute to both.

Suggested Citation

  • van Assche, Kristof & Valentinov, Vladislav & Verschraegen, Gert, 2022. "Adaptive governance: Learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(5), pages 1738-1758.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251561
    DOI: 10.1108/K-11-2020-0759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251561/1/van_Assche_2022_Adaptive_governance.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/K-11-2020-0759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2010. "Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice," Post-Print hal-02298145, HAL.
    2. Kristof Van Assche & Gert Verschraegen & Vladislav Valentinov & Monica Gruezmacher, 2019. "The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy's general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social‐ecological systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 308-321, May.
    3. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2010. "Cambridge handbook of strategy as practic," Post-Print hal-00578622, HAL.
    4. Steffen Roth, 2009. "New for whom? Initial images from the social dimension of innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 231-252.
    5. Robert A. Burgelman, 1991. "Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 239-262, August.
    6. Spencer Thompson & Vladislav Valentinov, 2017. "The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: a systems-theory perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(4), pages 1061-1085.
    7. Unknown, 2005. "Agriculture In Transition," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(1).
    8. Majken Schultz & Tor Hernes, 2013. "A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Deacon, Leith, 2020. "Land use tools for tempering boom and bust: Strategy and capacity building in governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. John Hendry & David Seidl, 2003. "The Structure and Significance of Strategic Episodes: Social Systems Theory and the Routine Practices of Strategic Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 175-196, January.
    11. Steffen Roth, 2017. "From Added Values to Augmented Realities. Introducing the Special Issue of Management and Functional Differentiation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 131-138, March.
    12. Daniel F. Jennings & Samuel L. Seaman, 1994. "High and low levels of organizational adaptation: An empirical analysis of strategy, structure, and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 459-475, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominik Aaken & Clemens Koob & Katja Rost & David Seidl, 2013. "Ausgestaltung und Erfolg von Strategieworkshops: eine empirische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 588-616, November.
    2. Leonardo Lemos da Silveira Santos & César Tureta & Bruno Felix, 2021. "A Qualitative Method Proposal for the Study of Strategy as Practice," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(2), pages 190353-1903.
    3. Kristof Van Assche & Martijn Duineveld & Monica Gruezmacher & Raoul Beunen, 2021. "Steering as Path Creation: Leadership and the Art of Managing Dependencies and Reality Effects," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 369-380.
    4. Silke Bucher & Ann Langley, 2016. "The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 594-613, June.
    5. Vesa, Mikko & Franck, Henrika, 2013. "Bringing strategy to time, studying strategy as experiential vectors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 23-34.
    6. José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & José Joaquín Céspedes‐Lorente & Belén Payán‐Sánchez, 2020. "The contribution of systems theory to sustainability in degrowth contexts: The role of subsystems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 68-81, January.
    7. Eeva Aromaa & Päivi Eriksson, 2014. "Management of Innovation in Small Service Companies," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 3(1), pages 31-40, June.
    8. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 2018. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 627-645, June.
    9. Lionel Garreau & Raphaël Maucuer, 2015. "The mise-en-sens tactics of civil society organizations to influence strategy," Post-Print hal-01787991, HAL.
    10. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Rasche, Andreas & Seidl, David, 2020. "A Luhmannian perspective on strategy: Strategy as paradox and meta-communication," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Philip Gylfe & Henrika Franck & Curtis Lebaron & Saku Mantere, 2016. "Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 133-148, January.
    13. Katharina Dittrich & Stéphane Guérard & David Seidl, 2016. "Talking About Routines: The Role of Reflective Talk in Routine Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 678-697, June.
    14. Maria Lusiani & Gianluca D'Inca' Levis, 2016. "Keeping tensions up: A reflexive analysis of the (strategy)-making-of Dolomiti Contemporanee," Working Papers 3, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    15. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Deacon, Leith, 2020. "Land use tools for tempering boom and bust: Strategy and capacity building in governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Albana Berisha Qehaja & Enver Kutllovci & Justina Shiroka Pula, 2017. "Strategic Management Tools and Techniques Usage: a Qualitative Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 585-600.
    17. Sarah Kaplan, 2011. "Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 320-346, April.
    18. Shaker A. Zahra & Daniel F. Jennings & Donald F. Kuratko, 1999. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(2), pages 45-65, December.
    19. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 0. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    20. Freek Vermeulen, 2018. "A basic theory of inheritance: How bad practice prevails," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1603-1629, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.