IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04981598.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Delacour

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Andrea Zaara

    (SIG - Services Industriels de Genève)

Abstract

Despite the recognition of the benefits of the complex causality perspective to understand organizational phenomena, it remains difficult to apply. To address this gap, we propose an analytical framework ontologically grounded in Aristotle's conceptualization of causes and causalities. This framework unfolds in three steps: First, it identifies the four primary and per se causes; second, the other causes, including accidents, instruments and secondary causes; and third, it examines their interrelations through two types of causalities-reciprocal and total, as well as partial convergent or divergent. By providing an ontological foundation for causes and causalities our framework allows researchers to investigate any organizational phenomena, thereby operationalizing and deepening our understanding of causal complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Delacour & Andrea Zaara, 2025. "Embracing causal complexity: An analytical framework based on Aristotle’s conceptualization of causes and causalities," Post-Print hal-04981598, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04981598
    DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.532
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04981598v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04981598v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24072/pcjournal.532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolphe Durand & Joep Cornelissen, 2012. "More than just novelty: conceptual blending and causality," Post-Print hal-00699180, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoping Zhao & Audrey Murrell, 2022. "Does A Virtuous Circle Really Exist? Revisiting the Causal Linkage Between CSP and CFP," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 173-192, April.
    2. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    3. Simona Giorgi, 2017. "The Mind and Heart of Resonance: The Role of Cognition and Emotions in Frame Effectiveness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 711-738, July.
    4. Nora Meziani & Laure Cabantous, 2020. "Acting Intuition into Sense: How Film Crews Make Sense with Embodied Ways of Knowing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1384-1419, November.
    5. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen, 2017. "The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 4-16, January.
    6. Tucker, Danielle A. & Hendy, Jane & Barlow, James, 2016. "The dynamic nature of social accounts: An examination of how interpretive processes impact on account effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6079-6087.
    7. Christian Busch, 2024. "Towards a Theory of Serendipity: A Systematic Review and Conceptualization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 1110-1151, May.
    8. Busch, Christian, 2024. "Towards a theory of serendipity: a systematic review and conceptualization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04981598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.