IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03896378.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Évaluer l’action éducative des lycées à travers les indicateurs de valeur ajoutée des lycées : quand le « bruit » s’immisce dans l’administration de la preuve

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Núñez-Regueiro

    (LaRAC - Laboratoire de Recherche sur les Apprentissages en Contexte - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Pascal Bressoux

    (LaRAC - Laboratoire de Recherche sur les Apprentissages en Contexte - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Chaque année, le ministère de l'Éducation nationale publie des indicateurs de valeur ajoutée des lycées (IVAL) visant à mesurer l'efficacité des actions éducatives. Conçus comme outils de pilotage fiables, ces IVAL jouent un rôle décisionnel important dans le travail des équipes éducatives. Pourtant, les IVAL sont limités par la non-prise en compte d'une erreur d'échantillonnage qui confond l'action des lycées avec du « bruit » statistique (i.e., les effets du hasard). Retraçant l'historique de ces indicateurs-depuis leurs origines dans la recherche sur les effets-établissement, jusqu'à leur diffusion en France-, cette étude montre en quoi cette non-prise en compte de l'erreur d'échantillonnage pose un problème de mesure qui contrarie une évaluation fiable de l'action éducative. Pour pallier cette difficulté, des stratégies d'estimation alternatives sont proposées. La pertinence de cette critique est illustrée à travers l'étude de 112 lycées de l'académie de Grenoble et de leur action éducative sur la réussite au baccalauréat.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Núñez-Regueiro & Pascal Bressoux, 2022. "Évaluer l’action éducative des lycées à travers les indicateurs de valeur ajoutée des lycées : quand le « bruit » s’immisce dans l’administration de la preuve," Post-Print hal-03896378, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03896378
    DOI: 10.3917/rfs.632.0257
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03896378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03896378/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/rfs.632.0257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingliang Li, 2007. "Bayesian Proportional Hazard Analysis of the Timing of High School Dropout Decisions," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 529-556.
    2. Cunha, Jesse M. & Miller, Trey, 2014. "Measuring value-added in higher education: Possibilities and limitations in the use of administrative data," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-77.
    3. Harvey Goldstein & David J. Spiegelhalter, 1996. "League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(3), pages 385-409, May.
    4. Meyer, Robert H., 1997. "Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 283-301, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aedin Doris & Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman, 2019. "Good Schools or Good Students? The Importance of Selectivity for School Rankings," Economics Department Working Paper Series n293-19.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    2. Paul Hewson & Keming Yu, 2008. "Quantile regression for binary performance indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 401-418, September.
    3. Brasington, D. M., 2003. "The supply of public school quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 367-377, August.
    4. Bornmann, Lutz & Leydesdorff, Loet & Wang, Jian, 2014. "How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 175-180.
    5. David Brasington & Don Haurin, 2005. "Capitalization of Parent, School, and Peer Group Components of School Quality into House Price," Departmental Working Papers 2005-04, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    6. Arpino, Bruno & Varriale, Roberta, 2009. "Assessing the quality of institutions’ rankings obtained through multilevel linear regression models," MPRA Paper 19873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Bacalhau, Priscilla & Mattos, Enlinson & Ponczek, Vladimir Pinheiro, 2019. "College quality signaling and individual performance: effects on labor market outcomes after graduation," Textos para discussão 502, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    8. Alejandro Arenas Alzate, 2021. "Mejores colegios en Colombia: efecto de las condiciones socioeconómicas sobre el desempeno escolar," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 19829, Universidad EAFIT.
    9. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    10. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2015. "Multidimensional performance assessment using dominance criteria," Working Papers 115cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    11. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    12. Frank Eijkenaar & René C. J. A. van Vliet, 2014. "Performance Profiling in Primary Care," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(2), pages 192-205, February.
    13. John Robinson & Scott Zeger & Christopher Forrest, 2004. "A Hierarchical Multivariate Two-Part Model for Profiling Providers' Effects on Healthcare Charges," Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1052, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    14. Martini, Gianmaria & Berta, Paolo & Mullahy, John & Vittadini, Giorgio, 2014. "The effectiveness–efficiency trade-off in health care: The case of hospitals in Lombardy, Italy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 217-231.
    15. Adnett, Nick & Bougheas, Spiros & Davies, Peter, 2002. "Market-based reforms of public schooling: some unpleasant dynamics," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 323-330, August.
    16. Francesca Giambona & Mariano Porcu & Isabella Sulis, 2017. "Students Mobility: Assessing the Determinants of Attractiveness Across Competing Territorial Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 1105-1132, September.
    17. Jiang, Dezhi, 2021. "Whose Investments in Higher Education Have Been Most Influenced by Labor Market Conditions in Recent Decades?," SocArXiv 83upm, Center for Open Science.
    18. M C A S Portela & A S Camanho, 2010. "Analysis of complementary methodologies for the estimation of school value added," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(7), pages 1122-1132, July.
    19. Li Mingliang & Tobias Justin, 2005. "Bayesian Modeling of School Effects Using Hierarchical Models with Smoothing Priors," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, September.
    20. Pier Ferrari & Laura Pagani & Carlo Fiorio, 2011. "A Two-Step Approach to Analyze Satisfaction Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 545-554, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03896378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.