IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03227021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chaotic world: beyond resilience, towards antifragility
[Monde chaotique : au-delà de la résilience, vers l’antifragilité]

Author

Listed:
  • Soufyane Frimousse

    (LISA - Lieux, Identités, eSpaces, Activités - UPP - Université Pascal Paoli - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Hugo Gaillard

    (ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université)

Abstract

This work addresses the potential of work on anti-fragility (Taleb, 2012; 2013) to complement the concept of resilience at the individual and organizational levels. We propose a distinction between fragile, resilient and antifragile. These capacities are distinguished by the nature of the decisions taken in a crisis context, and the finality of these decisions on the psychological and professional state of individuals: antifragile is reinforced by chaos. The individual and organizational conditions for the emergence of these capacities are then discussed. Finally, we consider antifragility at the organizational, team and individual levels. We introduce the notion of antifragility and hypothesize that it contributes to antifragility as a capability. The work culminates in the proposal of a research program that addresses the positioning of this concept (i.e. the levels of its analysis), the exploration and finally the measurement tools to be developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Soufyane Frimousse & Hugo Gaillard, 2021. "Chaotic world: beyond resilience, towards antifragility [Monde chaotique : au-delà de la résilience, vers l’antifragilité]," Post-Print hal-03227021, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03227021
    DOI: 10.3917/resg.142.0271
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03227021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03227021/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/resg.142.0271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Bettis & C. K. Prahalad, 1995. "The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 5-14.
    2. Isabelle Galois & Alain Lacroux, 2014. "« Serious games » et recrutement : quels enjeux de recherche en gestion des ressources humaines ?," Post-Print hal-01451999, HAL.
    3. Taïeb Hafsi & Gilles Lambert, 2012. "Le management de l'oubli dans la conduite des organisations," Revue française d'économie, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 149-183.
    4. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    5. R. A. Thiétart & B. Forgues, 1995. "Chaos Theory and Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 19-31, February.
    6. Karl E. Weick, 1988. "Enacted Sensemaking In Crisis Situations[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 305-317, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monika Winn & Manfred Kirchgeorg & Andrew Griffiths & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Elmar Günther, 2011. "Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 157-173, March.
    2. Elitsa R. Banalieva & Ravi Sarathy, 2011. "A Contingency Theory of Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 593-634, October.
    3. Tan, Justin & Wang, Liang, 2010. "Flexibility-efficiency tradeoff and performance implications among Chinese SOEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 356-362, April.
    4. Shubham Sharma & Usha Lenka, 2022. "On the shoulders of giants: uncovering key themes of organizational unlearning research in mainstream management journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1599-1695, August.
    5. Casillas, José C. & Moreno, Ana M. & Acedo, Francisco J. & Gallego, María A. & Ramos, Encarnación, 2009. "An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 311-322, July.
    6. Zhou, Lianxi & Wu, Aiqi, 2014. "Earliness of internationalization and performance outcomes: Exploring the moderating effects of venture age and international commitment," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 132-142.
    7. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart, 2006. "Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Ko, Young Jin & O'Neill, Hugh & Xie, Xuanli, 2021. "Strategic intent as a contingency of the relationship between external knowledge and firm innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Ganotakis, Panagiotis & Konara, Palitha & Kafouros, Mario & Love, James H., 2022. "Taking a time-out from exporting: Implications for the likelihood of export re-entry and re-entry export performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    10. Jacobs, Sofie & Cambré, Bart & Huysentruyt, Marieke & Schramme, Annick, 2016. "Unraveling Belgian fashion designers' high perceived success: A set-theoretic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1407-1411.
    11. Nooteboom, B., 2005. "Entrepreneurial Roles Along a Cycle of Discovery," Other publications TiSEM 99106238-630d-4c39-98af-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Joao Vieira da Cunha & Ken Kamoche, 2000. "The age of emergence: toward a new organizational mindset," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp382, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    13. Abhoy K. Ojha & John L. Brown & Nelson Phillips, 1997. "Change and Revolutionary Change: Formalizing and Extending the Punctuated Equilibrium Paradigm," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 91-111, June.
    14. Bill McKelvey, 1999. "Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 294-321, June.
    15. Gaim, Medhanie & Wåhlin, Nils, 2016. "In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 33-44.
    16. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Degischer, Daniel, 2022. "Contextualizing deliberate learning from acquisitions: The role of organizational and target contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 194-207.
    17. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    18. Lee, Soo Hee & Williams, Christopher, 2007. "Dispersed entrepreneurship within multinational corporations: A community perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 505-519, December.
    19. Heechun Kim & Jie Wu & Douglas A. Schuler & Robert E. Hoskisson, 2020. "Chinese multinationals’ fast internationalization: Financial performance advantage in one region, disadvantage in another," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(7), pages 1076-1106, September.
    20. Schön, Benjamin & Pyka, Andreas, 2013. "The success factors of technology-sourcing through mergers & acquisitions: An intuitive meta-analysis," FZID Discussion Papers 78-2013, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crisis; Learning; Resilience; Complexity; Antifragility; Crise; Apprentissage; Résilience; Complexité; Antifragilité;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03227021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.