IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01700648.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Shades of the Innovation-Purchasing function – the missing link of Open Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Romaric Servajean-Hilst

    (i3-CRG - Centre de recherche en gestion i3 - X - École polytechnique - Université Paris-Saclay - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Richard Calvi

    (IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

Abstract

This paper seeks to instigate a new area of research in the EPI (Early Purchasing Involvement) literature around the question: How should a purchasing function evolve in order to identify and capture innovation in the supplier market? Particularly, we attempt to characterize the specificities of the Innovation-Purchasing functions, an emerging function acting in the fuzzy-front-end of projects. The contribution of this paper is a reification of the role of an Innovation-Purchasing function in an Open Innovation context, through the description of Early Purchasing Involvement in the Innovation (EPI 2) agenda. Design/methodology/approach In this empirical paper, the data is collected through an internal benchmarking study within a multinational multidivisional firm evolving in the automotive sector where a Purchasing function dedicated to Innovation is established in its various divisions. It is then analysed using the framework developed by Van Echtelt et al. (2008) to specify which activities are necessary to manage Early Supplier Involvement (ESI). Findings Our study reveals similarities and differences between the observed practices of what we call Early Purchasing Involvement in Innovation (EPI 2) and the more classical EPI activities in an NPD context. Specifically, we observed an enforced strategic role of EPI 2 that influences the innovation process by aligning it to supplier market capabilities and purchasing strategies. Research limitations/implications The research is based on a specific case study in the automotive sector. Further studies could consider some other contexts or test the applicability of the findings to other industries. Practical implications The implications of the purchasing function is an emerging topic of interest in a lot of industries. The insights developed in this paper help such firms recognise the specific issues and contents to support EPI 2 through some organisational decisions. Originality/value As an in-depth study of a single company dealing with an emerging topic, this research responds to calls for studies embedded in reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Romaric Servajean-Hilst & Richard Calvi, 2018. "Shades of the Innovation-Purchasing function – the missing link of Open Innovation," Post-Print hal-01700648, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01700648
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919618500081
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-smb.fr/hal-01700648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-smb.fr/hal-01700648/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919618500081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini, 2009. "Different Modes Of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework And An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 615-636.
    2. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "How Do Firms Source External Knowledge For Innovation? Analysing Effects Of Different Knowledge Sourcing Methods," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 1-17.
    3. Thomas Johnsen, 2009. "Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: Taking stock and looking to the future," Post-Print hal-00771091, HAL.
    4. Alexander Brem & Joe Tidd (ed.), 2012. "Perspectives on Supplier Innovation:Theories, Concepts and Empirical Insights on Open Innovation and the Integration of Suppliers," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p852, January.
    5. Rémi Maniak & Christophe Midler, 2008. "Shifting from co-development process to co-innovation," Post-Print hal-00404179, HAL.
    6. Kale, Prashant & Dyer, Jeffrey & Singh, Harbir, 2001. "Value creation and success in strategic alliances:: alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 463-471, October.
    7. Gianni Lorenzoni & Andrea Lipparini, 1999. "The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 317-338, April.
    8. Elodie Gardet & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2011. "The dynamics of coordination in innovation networks," Post-Print hal-00919245, HAL.
    9. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    10. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M., 2010. "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 699-709, July.
    11. Davide Luzzini & Markus Amann & Federico Caniato & Michael Essig & Stefano Ronchi, 2015. "The path of innovation: purchasing and supplier involvement into new product development," Post-Print hal-01289738, HAL.
    12. BLOME, Constantin & SCHOENHERR, Tobias & KAESSER, Matthias, 2013. "Ambidextrous governance in supply chains: the impact on innovation and cost performance," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2602, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    13. Remi Maniak & Christophe Midler, 2008. "Shifting from co-development to co-innovation," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 449-468.
    14. Thomas Johnsen & Richard Calvi & Wendy Phillips, 2011. "Purchasing and supplier involvement in discontinuous innovation: a literature review," Post-Print hal-00763038, HAL.
    15. Jouini, Sihem Ben Mahmoud & Charue-Duboc, Florence, 2014. "Establishing Relationships with New Suppliers Having Distant Knowledge to Target Discontinuous Innovation," HEC Research Papers Series 1087, HEC Paris.
    16. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    17. Lisa Melander & Nicolette Lakemond, 2014. "Variation of purchasing's involvement: case studies of supplier collaborations in new product development," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 103-118.
    18. Laursen, Keld & Salter, Ammon J., 2014. "The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 867-878.
    19. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "How Do Firms Source External Knowledge for Innovation? Analyzing Effects of Different Knowledge Sourcing Methods," TEMEP Discussion Papers 200907, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Johnsen & Marie-Anne Le Dain & Nadine Kiratli & Holger Schiele, 2022. "Editorial: Purchasing and innovation: Past, present and future of the field of research," Post-Print hal-03761525, HAL.
    2. Katia Picaud-Bello & Thomas Johnsen & Richard Calvi & Mihalis Giannakis, 2019. "Exploring early purchasing involvement in discontinuous innovation: A dynamic capability perspective," Post-Print hal-02380474, HAL.
    3. Laurence Viale & Dorsaf Zouari, 2020. "Impact of digitalization on procurement: the case of robotic process automation," Post-Print hal-03695535, HAL.
    4. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    5. Laurence Viale & Salomée Ruel & Dorsaf Zouari, 2022. "A mixed-methods approach to identifying buyers’ competencies for enabling innovation," Post-Print hal-03695531, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haji Ali Beigi, Maryam, 2021. "Is more diverse always the better? External knowledge source clusters and innovation performance in Germany," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 156, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    2. Heuschneider, Sara & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2016. "External search for exploration of future discontinuities and trends: Implications from the literature using co-citation and content analysis," Working Papers 92, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    3. A. Lasagni, 2011. "European SMEs, external relationships and innovation: some empirical evidence," Economics Department Working Papers 2011-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    4. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    5. Yu Liu & Hao Zhang, 2022. "Driving Sustainable Innovation in New Ventures: A Study Based on the fsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Alexander Lang & Anna-Teresa Tesch & Udo Lindemann, 2017. "Opening Up The R&D Process Is Risky — How Far Do You Have To Go In Order To Beat Your Competitors?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-21, June.
    7. David Doloreux & Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche, 2019. "Innovation type and external knowledge search strategies in KIBS: evidence from Canada," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 509-530, September.
    8. Mario Barchi & Marco Greco, 2018. "Negotiation in Open Innovation: A Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 343-374, June.
    9. Ye Jin Lee & Kwangsoo Shin & Eungdo Kim, 2019. "The Influence of a Firm’s Capability and Dyadic Relationship of the Knowledge Base on Ambidextrous Innovation in Biopharmaceutical M&As," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Jane Webb, 2017. "Keeping Alive Inter-Organisational Innovation Through Identity Work And Play," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Lu, Qinli & Chesbrough, Henry, 2022. "Measuring open innovation practices through topic modelling: Revisiting their impact on firm financial performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Romaric Servajean-Hilst & Katia Picaud, 2014. "Early Purchaser Involvement in Open Innovation- the case of an advanced purchasing function triggering the absorption of external knowledge in the French automotive industry," Post-Print halshs-00983662, HAL.
    13. Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele & Cricelli, Livio, 2016. "An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 501-516.
    14. Daniela Rupo & Mirko Perano & Giovanna Centorrino & Alfonso Vargas-Sanchez, 2018. "A Framework Based on Sustainability, Open Innovation, and Value Cocreation Paradigms—A Case in an Italian Maritime Cluster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    15. El Maalouf, Nicole & Bahemia, Hanna, 2023. "The implementation of inbound open innovation at the firm level: A dynamic capability perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Zhang, Jingjing & Groen, Aard, 2021. "Informal and formal open activities: Innovation protection methods as antecedents and innovation outputs as consequences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Katia Picaud-Bello & Thomas Johnsen & Richard Calvi & Mihalis Giannakis, 2019. "Exploring early purchasing involvement in discontinuous innovation: A dynamic capability perspective," Post-Print hal-02380474, HAL.
    18. Bogers, Marcel & Foss, Nicolai J. & Lyngsie, Jacob, 2018. "The “human side” of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 218-231.
    19. Hallberg, Niklas L. & Brattström, Anna, 2019. "Concealing or revealing? Alternative paths to profiting from innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 165-174.
    20. Björn Remneland Wikhamn & Alexander Styhre, 2017. "Open Innovation As A Facilitator For Corporate Exploration," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Early Purchasing Involvement; Open Innovation; Organisation of purchasing function;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01700648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.