IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01340206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From Smooth NPMization to Structural Changes in France: Accelerated Reforms, Mixed Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Bezes

    (CEE - Centre d'études européennes et de politique comparée (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gilles Jeannot

    (LATTS - Laboratoire Techniques, Territoires et Sociétés - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Based on an international survey (COCOPS) this chapter offers interesting insights to emphasize how French top public officials perceive administrative reform policies in France in terms of trends, tools and scope

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Bezes & Gilles Jeannot, 2016. "From Smooth NPMization to Structural Changes in France: Accelerated Reforms, Mixed Perceptions," Post-Print hal-01340206, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01340206
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://enpc.hal.science/hal-01340206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://enpc.hal.science/hal-01340206/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edoardo Ongaro, 2009. "Public Management Reform and Modernization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13074.
    2. Knill, Christoph, 1999. "Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 113-139, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    2. Maria Cucciniello & Claudia Guerrazzi & Greta Nasi & Edoardo Ongaro, 2015. "Coordination Mechanisms for Implementing Complex Innovations in the Health Care Sector," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 1040-1060, August.
    3. Marco Di Giulio & Giancarlo Vecchi, 2023. "How “institutionalization” can work. Structuring governance for digital transformation in Italy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 406-432, May.
    4. Francesco Capalbo & Adelaide Ippolito & Margherita Smarra & Marco Sorrentino, 2023. "Il ruolo strategico dei Sistemi di Misurazione delle Performance nelle aziende sanitarie. Un caso studio," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 119-142.
    5. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    6. Scapin Thomas, 2016. "The Ambiguous Meaning of the Ethical Issue in a Context of NPM Reforms: Insights from the OECD, Canada and France," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 93-119, December.
    7. Denita Cepiku & Alessandro Hinna & Danila Scarozza & Andrea Bonomi Savignon, 2017. "Performance information use in public administration: an exploratory study of determinants and effects," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 963-991, December.
    8. Christopher Pollitt, 2009. "Structural change and public service performance: international lessons?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 285-291, September.
    9. Soonae Park & Don S. Lee & Jieun Son, 2021. "Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development: The role of organizational factors in the public sector," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 894-908, July.
    10. Van Dooren, Wouter & hoffmann, conny, 2018. "Performance management in Europe: An idea whose time has come - and gone?," SocArXiv 9zyv8, Center for Open Science.
    11. Fabrizio Di Mascio & Alessandro Natalini, 2015. "Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 129-148, January.
    12. Michael Howlett, 2014. "From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 187-207, September.
    13. Huma Siddiqi, 2021. "Understanding the Causes of Variance in Provincial Response to COVID-19 in Pakistan by Using the Policy Capacity Framework," South Asian Survey, , vol. 28(1), pages 133-156, March.
    14. Michael Barrett & Eivor Oborn & Wanda Orlikowski, 2016. "Creating Value in Online Communities: The Sociomaterial Configuring of Strategy, Platform, and Stakeholder Engagement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 704-723, December.
    15. Proeller, Isabella & Wenzel, Anne-Kathrin & Vogel, Dominik & Mussari, Riccardo & Casale, Donatella & Turc, Emil & Guenoun, Marcel, 2016. "Do they all fail? A comparative analysis of performance-related pay systems in local governments," SocArXiv a3qsb, Center for Open Science.
    16. Fatih Demir, 2021. "Public Management Reforms In Turkey," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 63-83.
    17. Edoardo Ongaro & Ewan Ferlie, 2019. "Exploring Strategy-Making in ‘Non-New Public Management’ Public Services Settings: The Case of European Union Agencies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Asatryan, Zareh & Heinemann, Friedrich & Yeter, Mustafa & Rubio, Eulalia & Rinaldi, David & Zuleeg, Fabian, 2016. "Public sector reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it. Study," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 147039.
    19. Lisa Hansson & Lena Nerhagen, 2019. "Regulatory Measurements in Policy Coordinated Practices: The Case of Promoting Renewable Energy and Cleaner Transport in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Kristian Krieger, 2013. "The limits and variety of risk‐based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 236-257, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01340206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.