IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00463120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effects Of Communities Of Practice On The Success Of An Expert Recommending Service

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Vitari

    (MTS - Management Technologique et Strategique - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • Aurelio Ravarini

    (CETIC asbl - Centre d’Excellence en Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication)

Abstract

This article presents an explorative study of the impact of Communities of Practice (CoPs) on the success of a certain category of Knowledge Management Systems, hereafter called Expert Recommender Information Systems. They regroup Information Systems that identify and display individuals who have been qualified by the system as experts, and who are in a position to help users solve problems involving a business process breakdown. Rather than focusing on the Expert Recommending Information System itself, the author concentrates on the service it delivers, the Expert Recommending Service (ERS). Using multiple case study research, five different organizations were investigated, essentially in order to identify how CoPs influence the success of their ERS.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini, 2009. "The Effects Of Communities Of Practice On The Success Of An Expert Recommending Service," Post-Print hal-00463120, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00463120
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00463120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00463120/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Boland & Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi, 1995. "Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 350-372, August.
    2. Baumann, Michael R. & Bonner, Bryan L., 2004. "The effects of variability and expectations on utilization of member expertise and group performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 89-101, March.
    3. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and the State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Peter B. Seddon, 1997. "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 240-253, September.
    5. Stephen P. Borgatti & Rob Cross, 2003. "A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 432-445, April.
    6. Eric W. Stein, 2005. "A Qualitative Study of the Characteristics of a Community of Practice for Knowledge Management and Its Success Factors," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Gerlinde Koeglreiter & Ross Smith & Luba Torlina, 2006. "The Role of Informal Groups in Organisational Knowledge Work: Understanding an Emerging Community of Practice," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 6-23, January.
    8. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    9. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    10. Henri Isaac, 2005. "La théorie du millefeuille. De la non-substitution entre communications électroniques et face à face," Post-Print hal-00155834, HAL.
    11. Mark Thompson, 2005. "Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 151-164, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Maes & G. Poels, 2006. "Development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/406, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini & Bernard Fallery, 2006. "The Kms Recommending Experts In The Communities: Proposition Of A Theory On Their Success," Post-Print halshs-01924301, HAL.
    3. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Samer Faraj & Georg von Krogh & Eric Monteiro & Karim R. Lakhani, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 668-684, December.
    5. Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang, 2018. "Exploring the impacts of perceived e-collaboration service convenience on new product development in Taiwanese IC design companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 107-120, June.
    6. Nurlia Dewi & Willy Abdillah & Muhartini Salim & Slamet Widodo, 2021. "The Role of Leadership in Implementation Public Information System of Local Government Institutions in Indonesia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9.
    7. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    8. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2015. "Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 127-142, February.
    9. Smita Prashant Chattopadhyay & Madhuchhanda Das Aundhe, 2021. "Vendor boundary spanning in Indian Information Technology (IT) companies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1139-1177, September.
    10. Peter Otto & Martin Simon, 2008. "Dynamic perspectives on social characteristics and sustainability in online community networks," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 321-347, September.
    11. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    12. Teigland, Robin & Wasko, Molly, 2009. "Knowledge transfer in MNCs: Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 15-31, March.
    13. Beth A. Bechky, 2003. "Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 312-330, June.
    14. Kent D. Miller & Shu-Jou Lin, 2010. "Different Truths in Different Worlds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 97-114, February.
    15. Vandana Tamta & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Linking Emotional Intelligence to Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: Organizational Justice and Work Engagement as Mediators," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1580-1596, December.
    16. Ayodotun Stephen Ibidunni & Babatunde Daniel Agbi & Busola E. Kehinde, 2023. "Interacting Effects of Tacit Knowledge and Learning Orientation in Improving Firm Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2539-2560, September.
    17. Yongjun Choi, 2018. "When in Rome, Feel as the Romans Feel: An Emotional Model of Organizational Socialization," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Fascia, Michael, 2019. "WORKING PAPER SERIES PROJECT_2019: Study of Knowledge transfer principals," OSF Preprints w2uhg, Center for Open Science.
    19. Kim, Changsu & Oh, Eunhae & Shin, Namchul & Chae, Myungsin, 2009. "An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 436-448.
    20. Jani Merikivi & Antti Salovaara & Matti Mäntymäki & Lilong Zhang, 2018. "On the way to understanding binge watching behavior: the over-estimated role of involvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00463120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.