IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdaeee/eee2017-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Movilidad de los contribuyentes de rentas altas en respuesta a las diferencias regionales en los impuestos personales

Author

Listed:
  • Julio López Laborda
  • Fernando Rodrigo Sauco

Abstract

El objetivo del trabajo es contrastar econométricamente si las diferencias autonómicas en los impuestos personales (IRPF, Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio e Impuesto sobre Sucesiones y Donaciones) han podido tener alguna influencia en la elección de la comunidad de residencia de los contribuyentes más ricos. Las estimaciones se realizan con la base de datos proporcionada por el Panel de Declarantes del IRPF suministrada por el Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública. El trabajo concluye, en primer lugar, que las diferencias en los impuestos autonómicos influyen significativamente en la elección de la comunidad de residencia por los contribuyentes ubicados en la parte más alta de la distribución de la renta y que la movilidad ocasionada por las diferencias en el IRPF parece dirigirse solo a la región de Madrid. En segundo lugar, que algunas variables sociodemográficas o relacionadas con las oportunidades que las comunidades ofrecen a los individuos también son relevantes para explicar las decisiones de localización. Y finalmente, que las diferencias en el gasto público en los servicios fundamentales no influyen sobre la elección de la comunidad de residencia.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio López Laborda & Fernando Rodrigo Sauco, 2017. "Movilidad de los contribuyentes de rentas altas en respuesta a las diferencias regionales en los impuestos personales," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2017-28, FEDEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaeee:eee2017-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/eee/eee2017-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ufuk Akcigit & Salomé Baslandze & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2016. "Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 2930-2981, October.
    2. Marius Brülhart & Jonathan Gruber & Matthias Krapf & Kurt Schmidheiny, 2016. "Taxing Wealth: Evidence from Switzerland," CESifo Working Paper Series 5966, CESifo Group Munich.
    3. Brülhart, Marius & Parchet, Raphaël, 2014. "Alleged tax competition: The mysterious death of bequest taxes in Switzerland," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 63-78.
    4. Kathleen Day & Stanley Winer, 2006. "Policy-induced internal migration: An empirical investigation of the Canadian case," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 13(5), pages 535-564, September.
    5. Coomes, Paul A. & Hoyt, William H., 2008. "Income taxes and the destination of movers to multistate MSAs," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 920-937, May.
    6. Roger H. Gordon, 1983. "An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 98(4), pages 567-586.
    7. Young, Cristobal & Varner, Charles, 2011. "Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence From a Natural Experiment," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(2), pages 255-283, June.
    8. Henrik Jacobsen Kleven & Camille Landais & Emmanuel Saez, 2013. "Taxation and International Migration of Superstars: Evidence from the European Football Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1892-1924, August.
    9. Jon Bakija & Joel Slemrod, 2004. "Do the Rich Flee from High State Taxes? Evidence from Federal Estate Tax Returns," Department of Economics Working Papers 2004-12, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    10. Kirchgassner, Gebhard & Pommerehne, Werner W., 1996. "Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European Union: Lessons from Switzerland," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 351-371, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaeee:eee2017-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmen Arias). General contact details of provider: http://www.fedea.net .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.