IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/26036.html

EU’s Export Embargoes on Russia: Have they been effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Tadashi ITO

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the EU’s post-2022 export embargoes on goods with potential military applications against Russia. Using HS6-level UN Comtrade data for 2019–2024, I first estimate gravity-style specifications and event-study designs that confirm a sharp and immediate contraction in direct EU exports of embargoed goods to Russia. I then propose a product-level identification strategy that links potential transit country’s imports of an HS6 product from the EU to its exports of the same product to Russia in the post-2022 period. The results indicate that (i) EU export controls substantially reduced direct shipments, (ii) some Caspian littoral countries and major non-sanctioning suppliers—China, India, and Turkey—expanded exports of comparable goods to Russia, and (iii) there is nuanced but limited evidence of roundabout trade, whereby sanctioned goods were exported from the EU to these Russia-friendly countries and then re-exported to Russia. These findings imply that the effectiveness of export embargoes hinges not only on the scope of the listed items but also on enforcement that targets high-risk transit routes and substitute suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadashi ITO, 2026. "EU’s Export Embargoes on Russia: Have they been effective?," Discussion papers 26036, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/26e036.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthieu Crozet & Julian Hinz, 2020. "Friendly fire: the trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 35(101), pages 97-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jerg Gutmann & Matthias Neuenkirch & Florian Neumeier, 2024. "Do China and Russia undermine Western sanctions? Evidence from DiD and event study estimation," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 132-160, February.
    2. Miguel Ángel Almazán‐Gómez & Carlos Llano & Julián Pérez & Daniel Rauhut, 2024. "Socioeconomic impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine: A multiregional assessment for Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 333-354, March.
    3. Görg, Holger & Jacobs, Anna & Meuchelböck, Saskia, 2024. "Who is to suffer? Quantifying the impact of sanctions on German firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Sonali Chowdhry & Julian Hinz & Katrin Kamin & Joschka Wanner, 2024. "Brothers in arms: the value of coalitions in sanctions regimes," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 39(118), pages 471-512.
    5. Haibo Jia & Hao Yun & Khalid Khan, 2025. "Does the Russia-Ukraine war cause exchange rate depreciation? Evidence from the rouble exchange rate," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 24(2), pages 225-239, May.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:z8f4h_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ina C. Jäkel & Søren Østervig & Erdal Yalcin, 2024. "The effects of heterogeneous sanctions on exporting firms: Evidence from Denmark," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 161-189, February.
    8. Funke, Michael & Wende, Adrian, 2025. "The limited effectiveness of sanctions on Russia: Modeling loopholes and workarounds," BOFIT Discussion Papers 4/2025, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    9. HAYAKAWA, Kazunobu & KIMURA, Fukunari & YAMANOUCHI, Kenta, 2025. "The trade effects of export control regulations in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Lastauskas, Povilas & Proškutė, Aurelija & Žaldokas, Alminas, 2023. "How do firms adjust when trade stops?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 287-307.
    11. Barseghyan, Gayane, 2019. "Sanctions and counter-sanctions : What did they do?," BOFIT Discussion Papers 24/2019, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    12. Kazunobu HAYAKAWA & Keiko ITO, 2025. "The Collateral Damage of US Export Control Regulations on Japanese Suppliers’ Exports to China," Discussion papers 25061, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    13. Gabriel Felbermayr & Hendrik Mahlkow & Alexander Sandkamp, 2023. "Cutting through the value chain: the long-run effects of decoupling the East from the West," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 75-108, February.
    14. Xiang Fang & Zhiyong Yang & Kevin Kam Fung So & Yingying Shao & Zhuofan Zhang & Grace Fang Yu-Buck, 2025. "Stay or leave? How corporate responses to economic sanctions shape consumer reactions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 1401-1421, September.
    15. Matthieu Crozet & Julian Hinz, 2023. "Blowback: The Effect of Sanctions on Democratic Elections," Working Papers hal-04150484, HAL.
    16. Gustavo de Souza & Naiyuan Hu & Haishi Li & Yuan Mei, 2023. "(Trade) War and Peace: How to Impose International Trade Sanctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 10477, CESifo.
    17. Kazunobu Hayakawa, 2026. "The trade effects of the US export control regulations," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Koenig, Pamina & Poncet, Sandra, 2022. "The effects of the Rana Plaza collapse on the sourcing choices of French importers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Jerg Gutmann & Matthias Neuenkirch & Florian Neumeier, 2024. "Political Economy of International Sanctions," Research Papers in Economics 2024-07, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    20. Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir & Romalis, John, 2024. "Russian counter-sanctions and smuggling: Forensics with structural gravity estimation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    21. Juan de Lucio & Raúl Mínguez & Asier Minondo & Francisco Requena, 2024. "Reducing trade with Russia: Sanctions vs. reputation," Working Papers 2406, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.