IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/24041.html

Impact of Technological Decoupling between the United States and China on Trade and Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Naoto JINJI
  • Shunya OZAWA

Abstract

We quantify the impact of trade and technology transfer restrictions between the United States (US) and China, technology protection policies in China, and export control laws in both countries through the US-China technological decoupling. To achieve this, we develop a dynamic quantitative general equilibrium trade model that considers foreign direct investment involving technology transfer. Our model comprises the final and intermediate goods sectors and assumes that only the latter utilizes technology capital. Our counterfactual analysis is based on data from 89 countries in 2016. We find that the US, China, and the world as a whole experience welfare losses owing to the US-China decoupling. We further observe that China’s technology protection policy affects not only countries with significant technology transfers from China but also those that rely heavily on technology capital. Countries with larger import shares from the US and China experience more substantial declines in the import of intermediate goods owing to the US and Chinese export control laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoto JINJI & Shunya OZAWA, 2024. "Impact of Technological Decoupling between the United States and China on Trade and Welfare," Discussion papers 24041, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/24e041.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, James E. & Larch, Mario & Yotov, Yoto V., 2019. "Trade and investment in the global economy: A multi-country dynamic analysis," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Carlos G'oes & Eddy Bekkers, 2022. "The Impact of Geopolitical Conflicts on Trade, Growth, and Innovation," Papers 2203.12173, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    3. Mr. Daniel Garcia-Macia & Rishi Goyal, 2020. "Technological and Economic Decoupling in the Cyber Era," IMF Working Papers 2020/257, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Kumagai,Satoru & Hayakawa,Kazunobu & Isono,Ikumo & Gokan,Toshitaka & Keola,Souknilanh & Tsubota,Kenmei & Kubo,Hiroya, 2023. "Simulating the decoupling world under Russia's invasion of Ukraine: an application of IDE-GSM," IDE Discussion Papers 874, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    5. McGrattan, Ellen R. & Prescott, Edward C., 2009. "Openness, technology capital, and development," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(6), pages 2454-2476, November.
    6. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "A micro-macro model of foreign direct investment: knowledge-based gravity forces, self-selection and third-country effects," MPRA Paper 115542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Explaining foreign direct investment patterns: a testable micro-macro gravity model for FDI," MPRA Paper 115273, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kox, Henk L.M., 2023. "Testing an extended knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment," MPRA Paper 117266, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Linking the knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment with national knowledge systems," EconStor Preprints 266495, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Testing the knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment: New evidence," MPRA Paper 114177, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. D'Arcangelo, Filippo Maria & Galeotti, Marzio, 2025. "Environmental policy and investment location: The risk of carbon leakage in the EU ETS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Revisiting the knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment: New multi-country evidence," MPRA Paper 114559, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2022.
    8. Jackson, Karen & Shepotylo, Oleksandr, 2021. "Belt and road: The China dream?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Tanaka, Ayumu & Ito, Banri & Jinji, Naoto, 2023. "Individual preferences toward inward foreign direct investment: A survey experiment," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Camarero, Mariam & Moliner, Sergi & Tamarit, Cecilio, 2024. "A Fresh Assessment of the Depth of the “Euro Effect" on US FDI," Single Market Economics Papers WP2024/18, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (European Commission), Chief Economist Team.
    11. Shekhar Aiyar & Franziska Ohnsorge, 2024. "Geoeconomic Fragmentation and "Connector" Countries," CAMA Working Papers 2024-53, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    12. Henk L. M. Kox & Hugo Rojas‐Romagosa, 2020. "How trade and investment agreements affect bilateral foreign direct investment: Results from a structural gravity model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), December.
    13. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Jin Suk Park & Eunju Hwang, 2023. "Sectoral FTA gains, conflicts, and the role of interindustry factor mobility: Evidence from Korea's free trade agreement," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 97-123, February.
    15. Gabriel Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler & Volker Treier & Heribert Dieter & Christoph Herrmann & Cosimo Beverelli & Simon Neumüller & Robert Teh & Richard Senti & Matthias Lücke & Peter-Tobias Stoll, 2014. "Bali-Abkommen: Wer gewinnt, und wer trägt die Kosten?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(03), pages 03-34, February.
    16. Laurent Didier, 2017. "South-South Trade and Geographical Diversification of Intra-SSA Trade: Evidence from BRICs," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 139-154, June.
    17. Pauly, Stefan & Stipanicic, Fernando, 2021. "The creation and diffusion of knowledge: Evidence from the Jet Age," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2112, CEPREMAP.
    18. Raguideau-Hannotin, Léonore, 2023. "The case of financial and banking integration of Central, Eastern and South Eastern European countries: A gravity model approach," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 91-111.
    19. Rados³aw Pastusiak & Monika Bolek & Magdalena Jasiniak & Jakub Keller, 2018. "Effectiveness of special economic zones of Poland," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 263-285.
    20. Jason H. Bowman & Xiaoping Chen & Ben G. Li, 2021. "A tale of two gravities," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 52-75, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:24041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.