IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/14069.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nuclear Power Plants Shutdown and Alternative Power Plants Installation: A nine-region spatial equilibrium analysis of the electric power market in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • HOSOE Nobuhiro

Abstract

After the Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent nuclear accident, nuclear power stations no longer can be presumed to be perfectly safe and thus hardly can be allowed to restart in Japan. In this study, we develop a nine-region spatial equilibrium model of the Japanese power market and simulate two-part situations: (a) none of the nuclear power plants can operate any longer and (b) gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) power plants are installed to fully cover the lost capacity of the nuclear power plants. If all of the nuclear power plants are shut down, average power prices would rise by 1.5-3 yen/kWh. By replacing that lost capacity with the GTCC power plants, we could compress the average price rise by as high as 0.5-1.5 yen/kWh compared with the status quo. Their impact, however, would differ by region on the basis of the share of nuclear power in their plant portfolios. When nuclear power is fully available, inter-regional transmission is mainly driven by the abundant base-load capacity, including nuclear power, at night. After the nuclear power plant shutdown, regions with abundant nuclear power capacity would not be able to afford to sell their power to other regions, causing less serious congestion at the inter-regional transmission links. The installation of GTCC power plants would make the plant portfolios more similar among regions and reduce inter-regional transmission further, which would very rarely cause congestion. When we assume only boiling water reactors or old plants are shut down, the results indicate less serious impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • HOSOE Nobuhiro, 2014. "Nuclear Power Plants Shutdown and Alternative Power Plants Installation: A nine-region spatial equilibrium analysis of the electric power market in Japan," Discussion papers 14069, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:14069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/14e069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shu‐ichi Akiyama & Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2011. "A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis Of Japan'S Electric Power Network," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2‐3), pages 114-136, July.
    2. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Tanaka, Makoto, 2012. "Divestiture of TEPCO for reparation for the Fukushima nuclear accident–A path to vertical unbundling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 207-212.
    3. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Akiyama, Shu-ichi, 2009. "Regional electric power demand elasticities of Japan's industrial and commercial sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4313-4319, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 157-170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2015. "Nuclear power plant shutdown and alternative power plant installation scenarios – A nine-region spatial equilibrium analysis of the electric power market in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 416-432.
    2. Youngho Chang & Yanfei Li, . "An Integrated Asian Natural Gas Market: Potentials and Policy Implications," Chapters,, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    3. Mortha, Aline & Yajima, Naonari & Arimura, Toshi H., 2024. "Impact of the feed-in-tariff exemption on energy consumption in Japanese industrial plants," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Knaut, Andreas & Paulus, Simon, 2016. "When are consumers responding to electricity prices? An hourly pattern of demand elasticity," EWI Working Papers 2016-7, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 16 Mar 2017.
    5. Toshi H. Arimura & Tatsuya Abe, 2021. "The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(3), pages 517-533, July.
    6. He, Y.X. & Yang, L.F. & He, H.Y. & Luo, T. & Wang, Y.J., 2011. "Electricity demand price elasticity in China based on computable general equilibrium model analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1115-1123.
    7. Schlegelmilch, Kai & Cottrell, Jacqueline & Runkel, Matthias & Mahler, Alexander, 2016. "Environmental tax reform in developing, emerging and transition economies," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 93, number 93, July.
    8. Nobuhiro Hosoe & Makoto Tanaka, 2012. "How Much is TEPCO Worth?–Estimating the Fundamental Value of its Thermal Plants," GRIPS Discussion Papers 12-02, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    9. Wang, Nan & Mogi, Gento, 2017. "Industrial and residential electricity demand dynamics in Japan: How did price and income elasticities evolve from 1989 to 2014?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 233-243.
    10. Heshmati, Almas, 2012. "Survey of Models on Demand, Customer Base-Line and Demand Response and Their Relationships in the Power Market," IZA Discussion Papers 6637, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Hosoe, Nobuhiro & Tanaka, Makoto, 2012. "Divestiture of TEPCO for reparation for the Fukushima nuclear accident–A path to vertical unbundling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 207-212.
    12. Gao, Xin & Ye, Yunxia & Su, Wenxin & Chen, Linyan, 2023. "Assessing the comprehensive importance of power grid nodes based on DEA," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    13. Spandagos, Constantinos & Ng, Tze Ling, 2017. "Equivalent full-load hours for assessing climate change impact on building cooling and heating energy consumption in large Asian cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 352-368.
    14. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Japanese Electric Power Industry: DEA Measurement with Future Impreciseness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Daniel de Abreu Pereira Uhr & Júlia Gallego Ziero Uhr, André Luis Squarize Chagas, 2017. "Estimation of price and income elasticities for the Brazilian household electricity demand," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_12, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    16. Yasunobu Wakashiro, 2019. "Estimating price elasticity of demand for electricity: the case of Japanese manufacturing industry," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 173-191, January.
    17. GuiDeng Say & Gurneeta Vasudeva, 2020. "Learning from Digital Failures? The Effectiveness of Firms’ Divestiture and Management Turnover Responses to Data Breaches," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 117-142, June.
    18. Miller, Mark & Alberini, Anna, 2016. "Sensitivity of price elasticity of demand to aggregation, unobserved heterogeneity, price trends, and price endogeneity: Evidence from U.S. Data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 235-249.
    19. Akihiro Otsuka, 2015. "Demand for industrial and commercial electricity: evidence from Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Masike, Kabelo & Vermeulen, Cobus, 2022. "The time-varying elasticity of South African electricity demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:14069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.