IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

IBSAC (INDIA, BRAZIL, SOUTH AFRICA, CHINA): A Potential Developing Country Coalition in WTO Negotiations

  • Debashis Chakraborty

    ()

This paper argues that IBSA( India, Brazil, South Africa) as opposed to IBSAC (with China) is a far more coherent group when it comes to WTO negotiations as its interests coincide given the agenda that seeks to free trade asymmetrically with the developed countries having to concede more on market access than developing countries and LDCs will have to. The paper begins with the trade profiles of the IBSAC countries followed by a discussion on the evolution of a developing country alliance at the WTO negotiations. The genesis of IBSAC and the phenomenon of growing regionalism are analysed. The possible emergence of IBSAC as a negotiating coalition at the WTO forums is discussed next. The chapter is followed by an analysis on the potential role of a grouping called IBSAC-plus in WTO negotiations.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document1254200708.126467E-02.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=958&fref=repec
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by eSocialSciences in its series Working Papers with number id:958.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Apr 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:958
Note: Institutional Papers
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.esocialsciences.org

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Cadot, O. & de Melo, J. & Olarreaga, M., 1998. "Can Bilateralism Ease the Pains of Multilateral Trade Liberalization?," Research Papers by the Institute of Economics and Econometrics, Geneva School of Economics and Management, University of Geneva 98.11, Institut d'Economie et Econométrie, Université de Genève.
  2. Noelle Doss & Helen Cabalu, 2000. "When east meets south: economic gains from India-APEC trade," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(11), pages 1405-1418.
  3. Sachin Chaturvedi, 2006. "Trade Facilitation Priorities in India and Commitments at WTO : An Overview of Current Trends," Trade Working Papers 22088, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.