Gender and Innovation in South Asia
Women in South Asia have a great balancing act to perform, what with the dual burden of taking care of their homes and families and working outside the home or running a business. For them, mobility, family, transportation, financing, limited opportunities for social interactive learning and their tendency to be more risk-averse are some of the significant stumbling-blocks to innovation. In business women face gender bias in recruitment, sexual harassment in the workplace, and income inequality, and then bump into the the glass ceiling as they advance in their career. Womenâ€™s role as innovators could be enhanced through appropriate training, flexible work arrangements, childcare facilities and parental leave, support from incubators set up specifically for technologies that aid women, social and business networks, improved public transportation, and through a process of enabling social, health and political conditions that favour women. Since agriculture is increasingly feminised in South Asia, we need laws that will strengthen womenâ€™s rights to land and water. The focus must be on the development of agricultural tools and technologies designed for easy use by women, access to credit, information systems and value chains from which women are often excluded, increased access and support for participation in farmersâ€™ collectives and cooperatives which will improve their bargaining power and reduce transaction costs.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Gustafsson, Siv & Jacobsson, Roger, 1985. "Trends in Female Labor Force Participation in Sweden," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 256-274, January.
- Mueller, Stephen L. & Thomas, Anisya S., 2001. "Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 51-75, January.
- Baumol, William J, 1990. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 893-921, October.
- Chrisman, James J. & McMullan, Ed & Hall, Jeremy, 2005. "The influence of guided preparation on the long-term performance of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 769-791, November.
- R. Ganesan & Dilbagh Kaur & R.C. Maheshwari, 2002. "Women Entrepreneurs," The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 11(1), pages 75-93, March.
- Amin, Ash & Wilkinson, Frank, 1999. "Learning, Proximity and Industrial Performance: An Introduction," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 121-125, March.
- Megan K Blake & Susan Hanson, 2005. "Rethinking innovation: context and gender," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 37(4), pages 681-701, April.
- Cooper, Arnold C. & Folta, Timothy B. & Woo, Carolyn, 1995. "Entrepreneurial information search," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 107-120, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.