IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/cempwp/cempa6-26.html

Unclaimed support: changes in the take-up of means-tested benefits in the UK since 2008

Author

Listed:
  • Richiardi, Matteo
  • Popova, Daria
  • Mitton, Lavinia
  • Vella, Melchior

Abstract

Non-take-up of social benefits occurs when eligible individuals or households fail to claim welfare support to which they are entitled. This paper provides new estimates of take-up for major UK benefits between 2008 and 2023, including Child Benefit, Pension Credit, and Universal Credit together with the legacy benefits it replaced. Using Family Resources Survey data combined with the UKMOD tax-benefit microsimulation model, we reconstruct eligibility and compare simulated entitlement with reported receipt to estimate take-up rates. The results show substantial and persistent non-take-up across all programmes. Child Benefit maintains relatively high participation but declines following the introduction of the High Income Child Benefit Charge. Take-up of working-age means-tested support is considerably lower and gradually declines during the Universal Credit rollout, with only a temporary increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-claiming is more common among higher-income and more educated eligible households, while disadvantaged groups claim more consistently, suggesting a degree of self-screening. A decomposition analysis shows that changes in population composition over the period of 2008-2013 would predict higher take-up; the observed decline is likely driven by behavioural or institutional factors affecting claiming incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Richiardi, Matteo & Popova, Daria & Mitton, Lavinia & Vella, Melchior, 2026. "Unclaimed support: changes in the take-up of means-tested benefits in the UK since 2008," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CeMPA6/26, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa6-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/cempa/cempa6-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa6-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.