IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/cempwp/cempa6-26.html

Unclaimed support: changes in the take-up of means-tested benefits in the UK since 2008

Author

Listed:
  • Richiardi, Matteo
  • Popova, Daria
  • Mitton, Lavinia
  • Vella, Melchior

Abstract

Non-take-up of social benefits occurs when eligible individuals or households fail to claim welfare support to which they are entitled. This paper provides new estimates of take-up for major UK benefits between 2008 and 2023, including Child Benefit, Pension Credit, and Universal Credit together with the legacy benefits it replaced. Using Family Resources Survey data combined with the UKMOD tax-benefit microsimulation model, we reconstruct eligibility and compare simulated entitlement with reported receipt to estimate take-up rates. The results show substantial and persistent non-take-up across all programmes. Child Benefit maintains relatively high participation but declines following the introduction of the High Income Child Benefit Charge. Take-up of working-age means-tested support is considerably lower and gradually declines during the Universal Credit rollout, with only a temporary increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-claiming is more common among higher-income and more educated eligible households, while disadvantaged groups claim more consistently, suggesting a degree of self-screening. A decomposition analysis shows that changes in population composition over the period of 2008-2013 would predict higher take-up; the observed decline is likely driven by behavioural or institutional factors affecting claiming incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Richiardi, Matteo & Popova, Daria & Mitton, Lavinia & Vella, Melchior, 2026. "Unclaimed support: changes in the take-up of means-tested benefits in the UK since 2008," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CeMPA6/26, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa6-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/cempa/cempa6-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Brewer & Iva Valentinova Tasseva, 2021. "Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(3), pages 433-458, September.
    2. Sylvain Chareyron & Patrick Domingues & Lucie Fotsa Lieno-Gaillardon, 2021. "Does Social Interaction Matter for Welfare Participation?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 141, pages 49-70.
    3. Vanda Almeida & Silvia De Poli & Adrián Hernández, 2025. "The Role of Minimum Income Schemes in Poverty Alleviation in the European Union," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(1), February.
    4. Michelle Harnisch, 2019. "Non-Take-Up of Means-Tested Social Benefits in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1793, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Stephen P. Jenkins, 2022. "Top-income adjustments and official statistics on income distribution: the case of the UK," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 151-168, March.
    6. Mike Brewer & Ben Etheridge & Cormac O’Dea, 2017. "Why are Households that Report the Lowest Incomes So Well‐off?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 24-49, October.
    7. Nichols, Albert L & Zeckhauser, Richard J, 1982. "Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(2), pages 372-377, May.
    8. Wonsik Ko & Robert A. Moffitt, 2022. "Take-up of Social Benefits," NBER Working Papers 30148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Stephen Pudney & Ruth Hancock & Holly Sutherland, 2006. "Simulating the Reform of Means‐tested Benefits with Endogenous Take‐up and Claim Costs," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 68(2), pages 135-166, April.
    10. Blundell, Richard & Fry, Vanessa & Walker, Ian, 1987. "Modelling the Take-up of Means-tested Benefits: the Case of Housing Benefits in the United Kingdom," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(390), pages 58-74, Supplemen.
    11. Mike Brewer & Ben Etheridge & Cormac O’Dea, 2017. "Why are Households that Report the Lowest Incomes So Well‐off?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 24-49, October.
    12. Moffitt, Robert, 1983. "An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(5), pages 1023-1035, December.
    13. Jurgen Wiemers, 2025. "Non-Take-Up of Unemployment Benefit II in Germany: A Longitudinal Perspective Using Administrative Data," Papers 2508.21535, arXiv.org.
    14. Virginia Hernanz & Franck Malherbet & Michele Pellizzari, 2004. "Take-Up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries: A Review of the Evidence," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 17, OECD Publishing.
    15. Nick Pearce & Gavin Kelly, 2025. "The recent history and future prospects of the UK welfare state," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 28-40.
    16. Francesca Zantomio, 2015. "The Route to Take-up: Evidence from the UK Pension Credit Reform," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 77(5), pages 719-739, October.
    17. Pritchett, Lant, 2005. "The political economy of targeted safety nets," The Social Policy and Labor Discussion Paper Series 31498, The World Bank.
    18. Caren Tempelman & Aenneli Houkes-Hommes, 2016. "What Stops Dutch Households from Taking Up Much Needed Benefits?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(4), pages 685-705, December.
    19. Richiardi, Matteo & van de Ven, Justin & Vella, Melchior, 2024. "Mind vs matter: economic and psychologic determinants of take-up rates of social benefits in the UK," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA6/24, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    20. Stephen Pudney & Monica Hernandez & Ruth Hancock, 2007. "The welfare cost of means-testing: pensioner participation in income support," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 581-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenqvist, Olof & Selin, Håkan, 2023. "Explaining benefit take-up behavior – the role of incentives and habits," Working Paper Series 2023:24, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    2. Zantomio, Francesca, 2008. "The route to take-up: raising incentives or lowering barriers?," ISER Working Paper Series 2008-35, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Laura Castell & Marc Gurgand & Clément Imbert & Todor Tochev, 2024. "Take-up of Social Benefits: Experimental Evidence from France," PSE Working Papers halshs-04720989, HAL.
    4. Bargain, Olivier B. & Immervoll, Herwig & Viitamäki, Heikki, 2007. "How Tight Are Safety-Nets in Nordic Countries? Evidence from Finnish Register Data," IZA Discussion Papers 3004, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Olof Rosenqvist & Håkan Selin, 2024. "Explaining Benefit Take-up Behavior – The Role of Financial Incentives," CESifo Working Paper Series 11402, CESifo.
    6. Alari Paulus, 2016. "The antipoverty performance of universal and means-tested benefits with costly take-up," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/12, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    7. Laura Castell & Marc Gurgand & Clément Imbert & Todor Tochev, 2025. "Take-up of Social Benefits: Experimental Evidence from France," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-05366074, HAL.
    8. Pudney, Stephen & Hancock, Ruth & Zantomio, Francesca, 2006. "Estimating the impact of a policy reform on welfare participation: the 2001 extension to the minimum income guarantee for UK pensioners," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-21, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Stephen Whelan, 2010. "The take-up of means-tested income support," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 847-875, December.
    10. Pellizzari, Michele, 2006. "Unemployment duration and the interactions between unemployment insurance and social assistance," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 773-798, December.
    11. David Coady & César Martinelli & Susan W. Parker, 2013. "Information and Participation in Social Programs," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 27(1), pages 149-170.
    12. Sylvain Chareyron, 2018. "Pauvreté et non-recours aux dispositifs sociaux : l’étude du RSA « socle seul »," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 41-59.
    13. Andrew Aitken & Martin Weale, 2022. "Measuring National Income Growth Democratically: Methods and Estimates for the United Kingdom," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2022-17, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    14. Hernandez, Monica & Pudney, Stephen, 2007. "Measurement error in models of welfare participation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 327-341, February.
    15. Paul Fisher & Omar Hussein, 2023. "Understanding Society: the income data," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 377-397, December.
    16. Doorley Karina & Kakoulidou Theano, 2024. "The Trouble with Take-Up," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(2), pages 673-682, April.
    17. Stef Konijn & Derk Visser & Maria Zumbuehl, 2023. "Quantifying the Non-Take-up of a Need-Based Student Grant in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 239-266, September.
    18. Sylvain Chareyron, 2015. "Take-up of social assistance benefits: The case of homeless Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits: The Case of Homeless," Working Papers hal-01292107, HAL.
    19. Sylvain Chareyron, 2016. "Le non-recours aux aides sociales sous conditions de ressources," Erudite Ph.D Dissertations, Erudite, number ph16-01 edited by Yannick L'Horty & François Legendre, April.
    20. Terracol, Antoine, 2009. "Guaranteed minimum income and unemployment duration in France," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 171-182, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa6-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.