IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Formal Versus Informal Sector Choice of Wage Earners and their Wages in Turkey

Listed author(s):
  • Aysit Tansel


    (Department of Economics, Middle East Technical University)

This study considers those wage earners who are covered by a social security program as part of the formal sector and those wage earners who are not covered by any social security program as part of the informal sector. Using 1994 Household Expenditure Survey I first examine how individuals are selected into nonparticipation and employment in the covered, uncovered and other sectors. Then, I estimate the selectivity corrected wage equations to examine wage determination in these sectors. These analyses are carried out for men and women separately. The results indicate that wage earners with more education are more likely to have social security coverage while those with less education are more likely to be uncovered. Further, when controlled for the observed characteristics and sample selection, for men, covered sector wages are at least twice as higher than uncovered sector wages at all levels of experience and education. This is true with some caveat for women also. This large differential in wages can be taken as an indication of labor market segmentation between the covered and uncovered wage earners.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Economic Research Forum in its series Working Papers with number 9927.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 1999
Date of revision: Sep 1999
Publication status: Published by The Economic Research Forum (ERF)
Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:9927
Contact details of provider: Postal:
21 Al-Sad Al Aaly St. Dokki, Giza

Phone: 202-3370810
Fax: 202-3616042
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:9927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Namees Nabeel)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.