IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002672/4527.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A low-carbon strategy for Portugal – a hybrid CGE modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Proença
  • Miguel St. Aubyn

Abstract

The EU 2020 Climate and Energy Package, in force since June 2009, commits the European Union to reduce its overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to at least 20% below their 1990 levels by 2020, pursuing the ambition to make Europe a low-carbon and energy-efficient economy over the next decade. Under the actual EU emission market segmentation, this overall emissions reduction target is split down into a 21% reduction in emissions from the sectors covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and a 10% reduction in emissions from the non-ETS sectors, taking 2005 as the base year. Portugal, as an EU Member State, is subject to the EU climate-energy policy regulation and therefore is required to comply with country-specific emissions targets by 2020. In particular, Portugal may increase GHG emissions from the non-ETS sectors by 1% compared to 2005 levels by 2020, which must be reached with domestic policy measures. There is no national cap on emissions from the ETS sectors, although a 21% reduction must be achieved jointly across the 27 EU Member States by 2020. Thus, it is assumed that the EU ETS target applies to Portugal, i.e. Portugal should reduce emissions from the ETS sectors to 21% below 2005 levels by 2020. In this paper we intend to assess the impacts on the Portuguese economy when complying with this ambitious low-carbon strategy up to 2020. In our numerical simulations we employ a hybrid top-down/bottom-up modelling approach, which represents a reliable framework to analyse the economy-energy-environment interactions underlying carbon abatement policies. In particular, we make use of the Hybrid Bottom-up General Equilibrium Model (HybGEM) for Portugal – a multi-sector, CGE model integrating a bottom-up representation of the power sector, which has been designed for energy and climate mitigation policy assessment in a small open economy like Portugal. The HybGEM model is applied to simulate the economic, environmental and technological effects to achieve Portugal’s emissions targets for 2020, considering as policy instruments (1) the EU ETS with an economy-wide cap-and-trade system for emissions from energy-intensive sectors and (2) a domestic carbon tax for emissions from sectors outside the carbon trading (non-ETS sectors). The HyBGEM is numerically implemented as a system of simultaneous non-linear inequalities using the Mathematical Programming System for General Equilibrium analysis as a subsystem within the General Algebraic Modelling System – MPSGE/GAMS, and solved by using the PATH solver. Due to the preliminary nature of the results so far available, this abstract only presents the main simulated trends instead of quantitative outcomes which will be reported in the full paper. Preliminary results suggest that achieving the decarbonisation of the Portuguese economy considered in the simulated policy scenario leads to a contraction in output of energy (fossil-fuel) intensive sectors, reflecting the higher production costs associated with a non-zero carbon price. In the national power generation sector, there is an increased share of electricity produced from renewable energy sources as well as a diversification of the technology supply mix with carbon-free renewable power generation technologies (such as wind, biomass, and geothermal) replacing partly high-carbon fossil-fuels technologies (namely coal). The increased costs of electricity supply leads to a raise in electricity prices. In the new equilibrium, consumption is lower indicating the welfare cost of the transition towards a low-carbon economy. The real wage rate and the rental rate of capital fall below baseline levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Proença & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2012. "A low-carbon strategy for Portugal – a hybrid CGE modelling approach," EcoMod2012 4527, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Paper_EcoMod12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rutherford, Thomas F, 1999. "Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-46, October.
    2. Azusa OKAGAWA & Kanemi BAN, 2008. "Estimation of substitution elasticities for CGE models," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 08-16, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    3. Shoven,John B. & Whalley,John, 1992. "Applying General Equilibrium," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521266550.
    4. Bohringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2008. "Combining bottom-up and top-down," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 574-596, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin & Begum, Rawshan Ara & Said, Fathin Faizah, 2017. "Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 61-71.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Proença, 2013. "The role of renewable energy in Portugal´s decarbonisation strategy – application of the HyBGEM model," EcoMod2013 5647, EcoMod.
    2. Hübler, Michael & Voigt, Sebastian & Löschel, Andreas, 2014. "Designing an emissions trading scheme for China—An up-to-date climate policy assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 57-72.
    3. Xavier Labandeira, Pedro Linares and Miguel Rodriguez, 2009. "An Integrated Approach to Simulate the impacts of Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    4. Ghosh, Madanmohan & Luo, Deming & Siddiqui, Muhammad Shahid & Zhu, Yunfa, 2012. "Border tax adjustments in the climate policy context: CO2 versus broad-based GHG emission targeting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S2), pages 154-167.
    5. Andreas Peichl & Thilo Schaefer, 2009. "FiFoSiM - an integrated tax benefit microsimulation and CGE model for Germany," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    6. Karydas, Christos & Zhang, Lin, 2019. "Green tax reform, endogenous innovation and the growth dividend," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 158-181.
    7. Dai, Hancheng & Mischke, Peggy & Xie, Xuxuan & Xie, Yang & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Closing the gap? Top-down versus bottom-up projections of China’s regional energy use and CO2 emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1355-1373.
    8. Sebastian Rausch and Valerie J. Karplus, 2014. "Markets versus Regulation: The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy Proposals," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    9. Haqiqi , Iman & Bahalou Horeh , Marziyeh, 2013. "Macroeconomic Impacts of Export Barriers in a Dynamic CGE Model," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 8(3), pages 117-150, July.
    10. Labandeira, Xavier & Labeaga, José M. & Rodríguez, Miguel, 2009. "An integrated economic and distributional analysis of energy policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5776-5786, December.
    11. repec:old:wpaper:340 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Oscar Bajo-Rubio & Antonio G. Gómez-Plana, 2015. "Alternative strategies to reduce public deficits: Taxes vs. spending," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 18, pages 45-70, May.
    13. Xavier Labandeira & Miguel Rodriguez, 2004. "The Effects of a Sudden CO2 reduction in Spain," Others 0412001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. H. Allen Klaiber & V. Kerry Smith, 2013. "Developing general equilibrium benefit analyses for social programs: an introduction and example," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 6, pages 194-246, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Fullerton, Don & Ta, Chi L., 2019. "Environmental policy on the back of an envelope: A Cobb-Douglas model is not just a teaching tool," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    16. Peichl, Andreas & Fuest, Clemens & Schaefer, Thilo, 2005. "Dokumentation FiFoSiM: Integriertes Steuer-Transfer-Mikrosimulations- und CGE-Modell," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 05-3, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    17. Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Gómez‐Plana, Antonio G., 2020. "Spending in social services in China: A multi-country analysis," GLO Discussion Paper Series 447, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. José M. Labeaga & Miguel Rodríguez & Xavier Labandeira, 2006. "A Macro and Microeconomic Integrated Approach to Assessing the Effects of Public Policies," Working Papers 2006-02, FEDEA.
    19. Sugandha D. Tuladhar, Sebastian Mankowski, and Paul Bernstein, 2014. "Interaction Effects of Market-Based and Command-and-Control Policies," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    20. Robson, Edward N. & Wijayaratna, Kasun P. & Dixit, Vinayak V., 2018. "A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 31-53.
    21. Christoph Böhringer & Jared C. Carbone & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2018. "Embodied Carbon Tariffs," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(1), pages 183-210, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.