IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cem/jaecon/v18y2015n1p45-70.html

Alternative strategies to reduce public deficits: Taxes vs. spending

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Bajo-Rubio

    (Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha)

  • Antonio G. Gómez-Plana

    (Universidad Pública de Navarra)

Abstract

We examine the effects of several alternative measures intended to reduce government deficits for the case of Spain, distinguishing between those acting through taxes and through spending. The Spanish case is relevant as an example of front-loaded fiscal adjustment that has led to a large GDP fall, where (unlike the cases of Greece, Ireland and Portugal) the authorities were able to choose the composition of the adjustment measures. The empirical methodology is based on a computable general equilibrium model. All the simulated policies lead to a decrease in the levels of output and employment, and to a higher unemployment rate. The greatest contractionary effects appear in the case of an increase in the income tax, followed by spending cuts, especially in public education; in contrast, the contractionary effect is weaker for indirect tax increases. While income distribution for labour worsens with spending cuts, it slightly improves with tax increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Bajo-Rubio & Antonio G. Gómez-Plana, 2015. "Alternative strategies to reduce public deficits: Taxes vs. spending," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 18, pages 45-70, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:18:y:2015:n:1:p:45-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/volume18/Bajo.pdf
    File Function: Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/volume18/Bajo_appendix.pdf
    File Function: Online Appendix
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Gómez-Plana, Antonio G., 2025. "Austerity and asymmetries in the fiscal policies of the eurozone," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1592, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Oscar Bajo-Rubio & Antonio G. Gómez-Plana, 2025. "Austerity and asymmetries in the fiscal policies of the Eurozone: the case of Southern Europe," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Sergey Zhavoronkov & Konstantin Yanovskiy & Kirill Rodionov, 2015. "Political Factors of the Cuts and Surges in Government Spending: The Effects on Old Market Democracies and Post-Communist Countries," Working Papers 146, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2015.
    4. Moheddine Younsi & Marwa Bechtini, 2024. "Financing Health Systems in Developing Countries: the Role of Government Spending and Taxation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13182-13210, September.
    5. P. Campoy-Muñoz & M. A. Cardenete & F. J. De Miguel-Vélez & J. Pérez-Mayo, 2022. "How does fiscal austerity impact on poverty and inequality? The Spanish case," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 715-737, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:18:y:2015:n:1:p:45-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucila Solla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.