IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do frontiers give or do frontiers take? The case of intercontinental trade in France at the end of the Ancien Régime

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Daudin

    (OFCE)

Abstract

"In the eighteenth century, the trading activities of Nantes, Bordeaux, Marseilles and Rouen expanded much faster than the rest of the French economy. The usual trade analysis tools suggest that their trade had no effect on the French economy, as the most dynamic activity of these harbours merely used France as a warehouse between the West Indies and the rest of Europe. This paper examines the role of this maritime frontier in the domestic capital accumulation. Many authors asserted that the relations between European nations and the rest of the world played a great role in the “primitive accumulation” of capital before the Industrial Revolution. Their statements are controversial. Most economic historians would agree with Patrick O’Brien’s view as it is expressed in his 1982 paper : profits from the “periphery” were simply too small to have played a major role in European growth. This paper first transposes O’Brien’s computation to the case of France at the end of the Ancien Régime. Three estimations are needed: one of the annual rate of profit; one of the amount of trade; and one of the amount of capital invested for each unit of trade. My estimation for the annual rate of profits is 6.25% on a three-year rotation of capital, i.e. a rate of profit of 20% on the whole rotation of capital . For reasons developed elsewhere, I believe Arnould offers us the best measure of trade : he indicates the size of intercontinental French trade to be 610 million livres tournois (approximately £25 million) in 1787 . 125 ship investment accounts allow me to estimate the ratio between the amount of capital invested and the value of exported cargo to be 225%. Based on these numbers, annual French profits from international trade can be estimated at 142 million livres tournois. Computing profits is not enough, however. One needs to compute the extra profits provided by investment in intercontinental trade compared to investment in the domestic economy. Following the recommendations of Barbara Solow – and under the hypotheses that the remuneration of domestic capital was 4.5% and that 25% of French income went to capital, 15% to land and the rest to labour – this paper assesses that the existence of the intercontinental sector represented an additional income of between 1.5% and 2% for the French economy at the end of the Ancien Régime. The intercontinental sector effect was small compared to total French income. Yet, its existence had a redistributive role, mainly in the favour of capital. Through this redistributive role, it played a role in determining the saving rate and the capital accumulation rate. Under reasonable hypothesis, extra savings accruing from the existence of intercontinental trade represented 5-6.3% of total French savings. That increased the growth rate of the economy by 6-7.6% (i.e. 0.036-0.046 percentage points). Even if the intercontinental sector was a dynamic sector that “pulled” the rest of the economy, its direct role was small. This paper suggests that another, indirect, role may have been more important. The intercontinental sector encouraged capital accumulation in the domestic economy rather than irrigated it. Over-investment was a much more remote possibility in world trade than in one country’s domestic economy. By offering a way out of decreasing returns to capital, the intercontinental trade sector encouraged capital accumulation in the whole economy, in the same way as “heart of growth” sectors in AK-type growth models do. Actually, the usual notion of a high-profit sector “irrigating” the rest of the economy with its profits is difficult to justify: one expects capital to move to high-profit sectors, not from them. Accordingly, there are indications that the profits from the intercontinental trade sector were kept there, even if this did not exclude some asset diversification directed toward geographically close industrial firms in which the utilisation of knowledge and social networks already accumulated in intercontinental trade was possible. In addition to keeping its capital, the intercontinental sector attracted entrepreneurs – and their financial, human and social capital stocks – from the interior economy. That – negative – attraction effect was counterbalanced by the encouragement to capital accumulation. However, it is possible to show that theoretically the net effect would have been very small if the intercontinental sector had become an enclave. Ironically, as French entrepreneurs have often been exposed for their lack of capitalist thriftiness, the fact that they used an important part of their income to consume French domestic goods prevented that and was as such a good thing."

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Daudin, 2005. "Do frontiers give or do frontiers take? The case of intercontinental trade in France at the end of the Ancien Régime," Working Papers 5013, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/9287357d-8007-4fb8-b2ce-1f0026f4b216.doc
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darity, William, 1985. "The Numbers Game and the Profitability of the British Trade in Slaves," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(03), pages 693-703, September.
    2. Paul M. Romer, 1989. "Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth," NBER Working Papers 3098, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Inikori, Joseph E., 1990. "The credit needs of the African trade and the development of the credit economy in England," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 197-231, April.
    4. Coelho, Philip R. P., 1973. "The profitability of imperialism: The British experience in the West indies 1768-1772," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 253-280.
    5. Guillaume Daudin, 2002. "Comment calculer les profits de la traite ?," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/691, Sciences Po.
    6. Rebelo, Sergio, 1991. "Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 500-521, June.
    7. Thomas, Robert Paul & Bean, Richard Nelson, 1974. "The Fishers of Men: The Profits of the Slave Trade," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(04), pages 885-914, December.
    8. Daudin, Guillaume, 2004. "Profitability of Slave and Long-Distance Trading in Context: The Case of Eighteenth-Century France," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(01), pages 144-171, March.
    9. Velde, François R. & Weir, David R., 1992. "The Financial Market and Government Debt Policy in France, 1746–1793," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(01), pages 1-39, March.
    10. Engerman, Stanley L., 1972. "The Slave Trade and British Capital Formation in the Eighteenth Century: A Comment on the Williams Thesis," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(04), pages 430-443, December.
    11. R. B. Sheridan, 1965. "The Wealth of Jamaica in the Eighteenth Century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 18(2), pages 292-311, August.
    12. Guillaume Daudin, 2002. "The quality of slave trade investment in eighteenth century France," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2002-06, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    13. repec:eee:deveco:v:17:y:1985:i:1:p:99-115 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Solow, Barbara L., 1985. "Caribbean slavery and British growth : The Eric Williams hypothesis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 99-115.
    15. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin H. O'Rourke, Leandro Prados de la Escosura and Guilllaume Daudin, 2008. "Trade and Empire, 1700-1870," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp249, IIIS.
    2. Guillaume Daudin, 2006. "Profits du commerce intercontinental et croissance dans la France du xviiie siècle," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 605-613.
    3. Guillaume Daudin, 2002. "The quality of slave trade investment in eighteenth century France," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2002-06, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle)). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.