IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/138934.html

Psychological contracts with purpose: a review and path forward

Author

Listed:
  • Diehl, Marjo‐Riitta
  • Kevätsalo, Anna
  • Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M.

Abstract

This review advances the understanding of psychological contracts (PCs) that include third‐party beneficiaries and transcend self‐interested goals, which we term “PCs with purpose.” PC theory has challenged the assumption that social exchange relies solely on balanced rewards and inducements, highlighting that individuals may wish to contribute beyond the traditional give‐and‐take. Consequently, scholarly attention to ideological currency has grown, coinciding with the increasing prominence of purpose in management research and practice. Existing research on PCs in volunteering, the public sector, and nonprofit organizations offers additional insights into contexts where purpose is integral to organizational mission. Yet despite its relevance for employees and organizations, there is little consensus on how purpose should be systematically incorporated into PC literature. This review clarifies the role of purpose in the employee‐employer exchange as captured across the disparate strands of PC research. We develop a comprehensive framework of existing research, identify key challenges, and offer directions for addressing them. In doing so, the review provides new theoretical directions and a rich research agenda for advancing the understanding of PCs with purpose. We argue that foregrounding purpose in PCs will future‐proof the framework's relevance for understanding the employment relationship among employees who strive to make a difference through their work.

Suggested Citation

  • Diehl, Marjo‐Riitta & Kevätsalo, Anna & Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M., 2026. "Psychological contracts with purpose: a review and path forward," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138934, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138934/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Martela, 2023. "The Normative Value of Making a Positive Contribution–Benefiting Others as a Core Dimension of Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 811-823, July.
    2. Julia Zwank & Marjo-Riitta Diehl & Marion Fortin, 2023. "Three Paths to Feeling Just: How Managers Grapple with Justice Conundrums During Organizational Change," Post-Print hal-05585704, HAL.
    3. Ofer, Ephrat & Coyle-Shapiro, Jackie & Pearce, Jone L., 2019. "Eyes wide open: perceived exploitation and its consequences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90823, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Juan Pablo Román & Adalgisa Battistelli & Carlo Odoardi, 2014. "Organizational Respect as Mediator Between the Ideological Psychological Contract and Workers' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Findings from the Social Enterprise Sector," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 107-122, January.
    5. Julia Zwank & Marjo-Riitta Diehl & Marion Fortin, 2023. "Three Paths to Feeling Just: How Managers Grapple with Justice Conundrums During Organizational Change," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 217-236, August.
    6. Wayne O’Donohue & Lindsay Nelson, 2009. "The Role of Ethical Values in an Expanded Psychological Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 251-263, December.
    7. Annick Willem & Ans De Vos & Marc Buelens, 2010. "Comparing Private and Public Sector Employees' Psychological Contracts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 275-302, March.
    8. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.
    9. Ranjay Gulati & Franz Wohlgezogen, 2023. "Can Purpose Foster Stakeholder Trust in Corporations?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 270-287, June.
    10. Barkema, Harry G. & Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A-M. & Le Grand, Eva, 2024. "How do field workers in poverty craft meaningful roles to achieve social impact? Female teachers in slums in India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119475, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Claudine Gartenberg, 2023. "The Contingent Relationship Between Purpose and Profits," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 256-269, June.
    12. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2008. "Employee agency: challenges and opportunities for psychological contract theory," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49809, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Kaplan, 2023. "The Promises and Perils of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 288-301, June.
    2. León Valdés & Trevor Young-Hyman & Evan Gilbertson & C. B. Bhattacharya & Oliver Hahl, 2026. "The Authenticity of Purpose Claims: Firm Capacity and Job Seeker Responses to Recruitment Efforts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(7), pages 5853-5875, July.
    3. Juan (“John”) Almandoz, 2023. "Inside-out and Outside-in Perspectives on Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 139-148, June.
    4. Witold J. Henisz, 2023. "The Value of Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 159-169, June.
    5. William Ocasio & Matthew Kraatz & David Chandler, 2023. "Making Sense of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 123-138, June.
    6. Marya Besharov & Björn Mitzinneck, 2023. "The Multiple Facets of Corporate Purpose: An Analytical Typology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 233-244, June.
    7. Antonio Cabrales & Esther Hauk, 2026. "Optimally designing purpose and meaning at work," Papers 2601.05005, arXiv.org.
    8. Christopher Belanger & Samia Chreim & Silvia Bonaccio, 2024. "The Experience and Implications of Meaningless Work in the Public Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 563-578, December.
    9. David Giauque & Frédéric Cornu & Karine Renard & Yves Emery, 2023. "Opportunity to Use New Ways of Working: Do Sectors and Organizational Characteristics Shape Employee Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.
    11. Keisuke Kokubun, 2024. "Effort–Reward Imbalance and Passion Exploitation: A Narrative Review and a New Perspective," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Evans Kyeremeh & Emmanuel Erastus Yamoah & Alfred Yamoah, 2025. "Enhancing pharmaceutical supply chain performance: the impact of technology integration, interorganizational trust, and collaboration in the digital age," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Kirsten Robertson & David Hannah & Brenda Lautsch, 2024. "Harm, Then Good? How Work Meaningfulness Emerges from Doing Harm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 2437-2466, September.
    14. Rahul Nilakantan & Deepak Iyengar & Samar K. Datta & Shashank Rao, 2021. "On Ethical Violations in Microfinance Backed Small Businesses: Family and Household Welfare," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(4), pages 785-802, September.
    15. Rong-Tsu Wang, 2013. "Modeling Corporate Social Performance and Job Pursuit Intention: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Reputation and Job Advancement Prospects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 569-582, October.
    16. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2010. "From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49811, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Tyler John, 2026. "Regulation and Incentives for “Social Enterprise” in the United States: But First Greater and More Substantive Differentiation," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1-2), pages 267-296.
    18. James D. Westphal, 2023. "Systemic Symbolic Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Purpose: A Cautionary Tale," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 221-232, June.
    19. Michele Fioretti & Victor Saint-Jean & Simon C. Smith, 2024. "NGO Activism: Exposure vs. Influence," Papers 2411.06875, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    20. D. Albert & F. A Csaszar, 2026. "Search Heuristics Under Multiple Objectives: The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility," Papers 2606.15545, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.