IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/122760.html

Firms and inequality in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Eslava, Marcela
  • Meléndez, Marcela
  • Ulyssea, Gabriel
  • Urdaneta, Nicolás
  • Flores, Ignacio

Abstract

The relationship between firms and inequality has been a focus of recent attention globally. This chapter summarizes basic facts about this relationship for Latin America. Unlike advanced economies where superstar firm growth has prompted concerns over disproportionate income growth at the top, the facts we summarize illustrate that the main concern for Latin America is the extreme prevalence of tiny businesses whose workers and owners tend to populate the bottom income segments. The empirical likelihood that these businesses improve their productivity and grow to hire more workers and pay better wages is also very low. The region displays a deficit of employment generation in SMEs, by contrast to both microbusinesses (including self-employment) and large corporations. While the former tend to remunerate both workers and owners with very low incomes, the latter pay high wages but also exhibit low labor shares.

Suggested Citation

  • Eslava, Marcela & Meléndez, Marcela & Ulyssea, Gabriel & Urdaneta, Nicolás & Flores, Ignacio, 2024. "Firms and inequality in Latin America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122760, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122760/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharat Ganapati, 2021. "Growing Oligopolies, Prices, Output, and Productivity," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 309-327, August.
    2. Matias Covarrubias & Germán Gutiérrez & Thomas Philippon, 2020. "From Good to Bad Concentration? US Industries over the Past 30 Years," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-46.
    3. Marcela Eslava & John Haltiwanger & Álvaro Pinzón, 2022. "Job Creation in Colombia Versus the USA: ‘Up‐or‐out Dynamics’ Meet ‘The Life Cycle of Plants’," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(355), pages 511-539, July.
    4. Jorge Alvarez & Felipe Benguria & Niklas Engbom & Christian Moser, 2018. "Firms and the Decline in Earnings Inequality in Brazil," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 149-189, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rivera-Padilla, Alberto, 2023. "Market power, output, and productivity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    3. Spencer Y. Kwon & Yueran Ma & Kaspar Zimmermann, 2024. "100 Years of Rising Corporate Concentration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 2111-2140, July.
    4. Matej Bajgar & Chiara Criscuolo & Jonathan Timmis, 2026. "Intangibles and Industry Concentration: A Cross‐Country Analysis," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 88(2), pages 258-274, April.
    5. Diego A. Cerdeiro & Cian Ruane, 2024. "China's declining business dynamism," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 726-752, August.
    6. Li, Yifan & Miao, Zhuang, 2024. "The rise of superstar firms in the United States: The role of global sourcing," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 113-144.
    7. da Silveira, Jaylson Jair & Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, 2021. "Wage inequality as a source of endogenous macroeconomic fluctuations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-52.
    8. Peydró, José-Luis & Jasova, Martina & Mendicino, Caterina & Panetti, Ettore & Supera, Dominik, 2021. "Monetary Policy, Labor Income Redistribution and the Credit Channel: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee and Credit Registe," CEPR Discussion Papers 16549, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Matteo G. Richiardi & Luis Valenzuela, 2024. "Firm heterogeneity and the aggregate labour share," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(1), pages 66-101, March.
    10. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús & Mandelman, Federico & Yu, Yang & Zanetti, Francesco, 2021. "The “Matthew effect” and market concentration: Search complementarities and monopsony power," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 62-90.
    11. Adhvaryu, Achyuta & Bassi, Vittorio & Nyshadham, Anant & Tamayo, Jorge, 2020. "No Line Left Behind: Assortative Matching Inside the Firm," CEPR Discussion Papers 14554, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    12. Andres Almazan & Nathan Swem & Sheridan Titman & Gregory Weitzner, 2025. "Access to Capital and the IPO Decision: An Analysis of US Private Firms," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-102, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. Pınar ÇELİK, 2026. "The Evolution of Wage Inequality in Türkiye: Firm-Level Decomposition by Size, Sector, and Distribution," Fiscaoeconomia, Tubitak Ulakbim JournalPark (Dergipark), issue 1.
    14. Bryson, Joanna J. & Malikova, Helena & Garbe, Lisa & Backovsky, David, 2023. "Big Telcos Aren’t Necessarily Better: A Case Study of EU versus US Market Concentration," SocArXiv m42uh, Center for Open Science.
    15. Giroldo, Renato & Hollenbeck, Brett, 2021. "Concentration, Retail Markups, and Countervailing Power: Evidence from Retail Lotteries," MPRA Paper 109039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Pardy, Martina, 2025. "Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127983, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:2zy5h_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sara Calligaris & Chiara Criscuolo & Luca Marcolin, 2018. "Mark-ups in the digital era," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/10, OECD Publishing.
    19. Jianan Liu & Hongbo Cai & Carl Lin, 2025. "Competition in the labor market: The wage effect of employer concentration in China," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 343-379, July.
    20. Christopher Cornwell & Ian M. Schmutte & Daniela Scur, 2021. "Building a Productive Workforce: The Role of Structured Management Practices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7308-7321, December.
    21. Moser, Christian, 2016. "How Could Wage Inequality Within and Across Enterprises be Reduced?," MPRA Paper 95381, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.