IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/122689.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth

Author

Listed:
  • Gomes, Alexandra
  • Burdett, Ricky

Abstract

Background: In recent years, significant research has focused on understanding urban health inequalities across different locations and spatial scales in cities. At the same time, public health practitioners recognise the need for collaborative efforts beyond traditional health programs to address policy decisions impacting environmental quality and urban health. Despite this, there is a notable gap in the exploration of how spatial variations at the neighbourhood level compare with varying health levels. This research aims to bridge this gap, emphasizing the importance of understanding spatial dynamics to enhance the effectiveness of public health interventions and inform policy decisions in cities. Methods: In order to tease out potential associations between varying levels of urban health outcomes and socio-economic and spatial factors, this study focusses on female healthy life expectancy, child obesity, and diabetes within 12 London neighbourhoods situated in the boroughs of Southwark and Lambeth. It employs a combination of spatial clustering techniques, Geographic Information System (GIS) data, and mapping techniques to visually represent and provide a fine-grained analysis of specific areas in London in order to uncovering the strength and nature of the relationships between health levels and the spatial, demographic, and socio-economic characteristics of different urban neighbourhoods. Results: This research offers valuable insights into the complex dynamics of health outcomes across South London communities and emphasizes that holistic interventions, including how better housing, support for active lifestyles, and improved environmental management, can enhance health outcomes, and reduce disparities in cities. Conclusions: In essence, this study underscores the importance of analysing space in conjunction with social conditions when examining cities and neighbourhoods, providing valuable insights for discussions among local policymakers and academics.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomes, Alexandra & Burdett, Ricky, 2024. "Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122689, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/122689/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duncan, Craig & Jones, Kelvyn & Moon, Graham, 1998. "Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 97-117, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell, Richard & Dujardin, Claire & Popham, Frank & Farfan Portet, Maria-Isabel & Thomas, Isabelle & Lorant, Vincent, 2011. "Using matched areas to explore international differences in population health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1113-1122.
    2. Chia-Yueh Hsu & Shu-Sen Chang & Paul Yip, 2017. "Individual-, household- and neighbourhood-level characteristics associated with life satisfaction: A multilevel analysis of a population-based sample from Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3700-3717, December.
    3. infocede, 2001. "Desnutrición infantil en Colombia: inequidades y determinantes," Documentos CEDE 20100, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    4. Isabel Neira & Fernando Bruna & Marta Portela & Adela García-Aracil, 2018. "Individual Well-Being, Geographical Heterogeneity and Social Capital," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1067-1090, April.
    5. Kendrick, Denise & Mulvaney, Caroline & Burton, Paul & Watson, Michael, 2005. "Relationships between child, family and neighbourhood characteristics and childhood injury: A cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(9), pages 1905-1915, November.
    6. Steffen Andreas Schüle & Gabriele Bolte, 2015. "Interactive and Independent Associations between the Socioeconomic and Objective Built Environment on the Neighbourhood Level and Individual Health: A Systematic Review of Multilevel Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Mousquès, Julien & Renaud, Thomas & Scemama, Olivier, 2010. "Is the "practice style" hypothesis relevant for general practitioners? An analysis of antibiotics prescription for acute rhinopharyngitis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1176-1184, April.
    8. M. Lippi Bruni & L. Nobilio & C. Ugolini, 2007. "Economic Incentives in General Practice: the Impact of Pay for Participation Programs on Diabetes Care," Working Papers 607, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    9. Xinguang Fan & Maria Vignau Loria, 2020. "Intimate partner violence and contraceptive use in developing countries: How does the relationship depend on context?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(10), pages 293-342.
    10. Poortinga, Wouter, 2006. "Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 292-302, January.
    11. Phil Lignier & Diane Jarvis & Daniel Grainger & Taha Chaiechi, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Subjective Wellbeing: Exploring the Role of Social Capital in Metropolitan Areas Using Multilevel Modelling," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Sicsic, Jonathan & Le Vaillant, Marc & Franc, Carine, 2012. "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in primary care: An explanatory study among French general practitioners," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 140-148.
    13. Julius Fobil & Juergen May & Alexander Kraemer, 2010. "Assessing the Relationship between Socioeconomic Conditions and Urban Environmental Quality in Accra, Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Joseph L Dieleman & Tara Templin, 2014. "Random-Effects, Fixed-Effects and the within-between Specification for Clustered Data in Observational Health Studies: A Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Claudia Bitencourt & Gabriela Zanandrea & Cristiane Froehlich & Manuela Rösing Agostini & Roselei Haag, 2024. "Rethinking the company's role: Creating shared value from corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2865-2877, July.
    16. Nan Zhang & Laia Bécares & Tarani Chandola, 2016. "Patterns and Determinants of Double-Burden of Malnutrition among Rural Children: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Bécares, Laia & Nazroo, James & Albor, Christo & Chandola, Tarani & Stafford, Mai, 2012. "Examining the differential association between self-rated health and area deprivation among white British and ethnic minority people in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 616-624.
    18. Petrović, Ana & Manley, David & van Ham, Maarten, 2018. "Freedom from the Tyranny of Neighbourhood: Rethinking Socio-Spatial Context Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 11416, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Wilding, Sam & Martin, David & Moon, Graham, 2016. "The impact of limiting long term illness on internal migration in England and Wales: New evidence from census microdata," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 107-115.
    20. David Mmopelwa, 2019. "Household size, birth order and child health in Botswana," Discussion Papers 2019-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geographic Information System mapping (GIS mapping); health inequalities; London; neighbourhoods; socio-spatial inequalities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.