IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eab/microe/22803.html

The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia : A Quantitative Exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Zhai

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

Abstract

Capitalizing on recent estimates of infrastructure financing requirements in Asia, this paper frames a scenario for infrastructure development in the region and estimates the external effects of infrastructure investment. It also assesses quantitatively the economy-wide welfare effects of developing regional infrastructure in Asia, using a global computable general equilibrium model. The results show that developing Asian economies would gain significantly from the expansion of regional infrastructure in transport and communication. With annual investment of around US$800 billion in transport, communication, and energy infrastructure during 20102020, developing Asia is likely to reap welfare gains of US$1,616.3 billion (in 2008 prices) in 2020, or 10% of projected aggregate gross domestic product.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Zhai, 2010. "The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia : A Quantitative Exploration," Microeconomics Working Papers 22803, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:eab:microe:22803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eaber.org/node/22803
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14783 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fan Zhai, 2008. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 575-604.
    3. Fan Zhai (ed.), 2009. "From Growth to Convergence," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-25060-4, September.
    4. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Annette Pelkmans-Balaoing, 2009. "Regional Integration in Asia: The Role of Infrastructure," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Joseph Francois & Pradumna B. Rana & Ganeshan Wignaraja (ed.), Pan-Asian Integration, chapter 7, pages 439-485, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Euijune Kim & Seung‐Woon Moon & Yoojin Yi, 2021. "Analyzing spillover effects of development of Asian highway on regional growth of Northeast Asian countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1243-1266, August.
    2. Erwin Corong & Lawrence Dacuycuy & Rachel Reyes & Angelo Taningco, 2013. "The Growth and Distributive Impacts of Public Infrastructure Investments in the Philippines," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: John Cockburn & Yazid Dissou & Jean-Yves Duclos & Luca Tiberti (ed.), Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Asia, edition 127, pages 47-86, Springer.
    3. Gregory Chin, 2012. "Responding to the Global Financial Crisis: The Evolution of Asian Regionalism and Economic Globalization," ADBI Working Papers 343, Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Zhai, 2012. "Benefits of infrastructure investment: an empirical analysis," Chapters, in: Biswa Nath Bhattacharyay & Masahiro Kawai & Rajat M. Nag (ed.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, chapter 3, pages 80-94, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Zhai, Fan, 2018. "China’s belt and road initiative: A preliminary quantitative assessment," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 84-92.
    3. Michael Appiah & Stephen T. Onifade & Bright A. Gyamfi, 2022. "Building Critical Infrastructures: Evaluating the Roles of Governance and Institutions in Infrastructural Developments in Sub-Sahara African Countries," Evaluation Review, , vol. 46(4), pages 391-415, August.
    4. Oyamada, Kazuhiko, 2013. "Parameterization of applied general equilibrium models with flexible trade specifications based on the Armington, Krugman, and Melitz models," IDE Discussion Papers 380, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    5. Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2018. "Impact of border barriers, returning migrants, and trade diversion in Brexit: Firm exit and loss of variety," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Kazuhiko Oyamada & Kaoru Nabeshima & Etsuyo Michida, 2015. "Analyses of EU RoHS/ELV Directives Based on an AGE Model with Melitz-type Trade Specification," EcoMod2015 8304, EcoMod.
    7. Oyamada, Kazuhiko & Nabeshima, Kaoru & Michida, Etsuyo, 2015. "Simulation Analysis of EU ELV/RoHS Directives Based on an Applied General Equilibrium Model with Melitz-type Trade Specification," Conference papers 332610, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Edward Balistreri & Christoph Boehringer & Thomas Rutherford, 2025. "Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 10(1), pages 1-49, June.
    9. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Cray, Stephen R. & Gervais, Antoine, 2023. "Increasing marginal costs, firm heterogeneity, and the gains from “deep” international trade agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Har Sandeep Kaur, 2016. "Services Exports and SAARC Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Growth, Performance and Competitive Advantage," Millennial Asia, , vol. 7(1), pages 20-41, April.
    11. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Sébastien Jean, 2013. "International Agricultural Trade and Negotiations : Coping with a New Landscape [Commerce et négociations agricoles commerciales: s'ajuster au nouvel environnement]," Working Papers hal-01592099, HAL.
    12. Balistreri, Edward J. & Tarr, David G., 2016. "Comparison of Welfare Results from Trade Liberalization in the Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models: Impacts with features of real economies," Conference papers 332773, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Stephen Devadoss & Jeff Luckstead, 2018. "Implications of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement for Processed Food Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(3), pages 415-440, September.
    14. Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2016. "Impact of Brexit: Firm Exit and Loss of Variety," GRIPS Discussion Papers 16-12, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    15. Roberto Roson & Kazuhiko Oyamada, 2014. "Introducing Melitz-Style Firm Heterogeneity in CGE Models: Technical Aspects and Implications," Working Papers 2014:04, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    16. Li, Qiaomin & Scollay, Robert & Gilbert, John, 2017. "Analyzing the effects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership on FDI in a CGE framework with firm heterogeneity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 409-420.
    17. Andries Brandsma & D'Artis Kancs, 2015. "RHOMOLO: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelling Approach to the Evaluation of the European Union's R&D Policies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1340-1359, August.
    18. D’Artis Kancs, 2010. "Structural Estimation of Variety Gains from Trade Integration in Asia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 43(3), pages 270-288, September.
    19. Zeynep Akgul & Nelson B Villoria & Thomas W Hertel, 2016. "GTAP-HET: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity into the GTAP Model," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 111-180, June.
    20. Stefan KÜHN & Christian VIEGELAHN, 2019. "Foreign trade barriers and jobs in global supply chains," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(1), pages 137-167, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eab:microe:22803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shiro Armstrong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaberau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.