IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00973103.html

How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Messerlin

    (GEM - Groupe d'économie mondiale - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)

Abstract

A lack of political leadership is often perceived as the main source of the repeated difficulties of the WTO. The paper argues that such a lack of leadership is a systemic problem for many years to come. The large industrial democracies have constitutional rules making particularly difficult trade liberalization in agriculture, and their governments rely on majorities which are increasingly thinner, hence less resistant to even tiny pressure groups. Then the paper argues that bilateral trade agreements ("bilaterals") do not offer a solution to such a lack of political leadership. Firstly, it shows that the often mentioned recent increase in bilaterals grossly overestimates the true evolution. Secondly, it stresses the fact that, so far, the push behind these bilaterals comes mostly from the small countries, not from the large ones. Lastly, it shows that the 2006 initiative of the European Commission - the first proactive move of a large country - would launch a race to bilaterals so costly that they are unlikely to be sustainable in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues," Working Papers hal-00973103, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00973103
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-00973103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-00973103/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7421 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rudolf Adlung, 2006. "Services Negotiations in the Doha Round: Lost in Flexibility?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 865-893, December.
    3. repec:wbk:wboper:13422 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "The Doha Negotiations on Trade in Goods: At a Crossroads," Working Papers hal-00973102, HAL.
    5. repec:wbk:wboper:13429 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14783 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "Assessing the EC Trade Policy in Goods," Working Papers hal-00973100, HAL.
    8. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8230 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Arvind Panagariya & Jagdish Bhagwati, 1996. "The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 51856, September.
    10. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8230 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7245 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:wbk:wbpubs:15172 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8224 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. World Bank & International Finance Corporation, "undated". "Doing Business in Mexico," World Bank Publications - Reports 13430, The World Bank Group.
    15. Richard Pomfret, 2007. "Is Regionalism an Increasing Feature of the World Economy?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 923-947, June.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8224 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8226 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8226 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-00973103, HAL.
    4. Adlung, Rudolf & Molinuevo, Martin, 2008. "Bilateralism in services trade: is there fire behind the (BIT-)smoke?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2008-01, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Rupa Duttagupta & Arvind Panagariya, 2007. "Free Trade Areas And Rules Of Origin: Economics And Politics," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 169-190, July.
    6. Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, 2015. "A Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement for Services?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/25, European University Institute.
    7. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    8. Xiao-guang Zhang & George Verikios, 2006. "Providing Duty-Free Access to Australian Markets for Least-Developed COuntries: a General Equilibrium Analysis," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-09, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Koopmann, Georg & Vogel, Lars, 2011. "Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Union," HWWI Policy Papers 58, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    10. Teh, Robert & Prusa, Thomas J. & Budetta, Michele, 2007. "Trade remedy provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    11. Srinivasan, T.N., 2001. "India's Reform of External Sector Policies and Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Center Discussion Papers 28428, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    12. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Hyun‐Hoon Lee & Chung Mo Koo & Euijeong Park, 2008. "Are Exports of China, Japan and Korea Diverted in the Major Regional Trading Blocs?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 841-860, July.
    14. Tokarick, Stephen, 2011. "Should Countries Worry About Immiserizing Growth?," Conference papers 332133, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Kowalski, Przemyslaw, 2008. "Understanding BRIICS’ trade performance: analysis of unobserved heterogeneity in the gravity model of international trade," Conference papers 331690, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 1999. "Trade liberalization and regional integration: the search for large numbers," TMD Discussion Papers 97554, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Maurice Schiff & Yanling Wang, 2004. "Regional Integration And North-South Technology Diffusion: The Case of Nafta," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 283, Central Bank of Chile.
    18. Lee, Jong-Wha & Shin, Kwanho, 2006. "Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 283-301, December.
    19. Satya P. Das & Subhadip Ghosh, 2006. "Endogenous trading bloc formation in a North‐South global economy," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 809-830, August.
    20. Alpay, Savas, 2003. "How Can Trade Liberalization Be Conducive to a Better Environment?," Conference papers 331113, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    21. Demet Yilmazkuday & Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2014. "Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 513-535, August.
    22. Calderon,Cesar & Cantu Canales,Martha Catalina & Zeufack,Albert G., 2020. "Trade Integration, Export Patterns, and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9132, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00973103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.