IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/drm/wpaper/2021-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Chirat

Abstract

This paper provides a reconstruction of the intellectual cross-fertilization between Adolf Berle and John Kenneth Galbraith to account for their institutionalist challenge against “conventional economics†so as to bring political economy back to life. To do so, I go back to the genesis of Modern Corporation and Private Property before analyzing Berle and Galbraith’s answers to a set of fundamentals questions. What is the nature of modern competition ? What is the nature of the modern corporation ? What is the role of the State ? Lastly, how should American liberalism be reinvented to cope with the social issues of an affluent society ? Their answers to these questions reveal the deep affinities between the theoretical and political dimensions of their works, so that this work lies at the crossroads of the history of economic thought and the history of American liberalism in the postwar period.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
  • Handle: RePEc:drm:wpaper:2021-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economix.fr/pdf/dt/2021/WP_EcoX_2021-27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Rutherford, 2004. "Institutional Economics at Columbia University," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 31-78, Spring.
    2. Alexandre Chirat, 2019. "La société industrielle d’Aron et Galbraith : des regards croisés pour une vision convergente ?," Post-Print halshs-02182696, HAL.
    3. James M. Buchanan, 1992. "On Some Fundamental Issues in Political Economy: An Exchange of Correspondence," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Essays on the Methodology and Discourse of Economics, chapter 10, pages 201-230, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Jerry L. Petr, 1984. "Fundamentals of an Institutionalist Perspective on Economic Policy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Alexandre Chirat, 2018. "When Galbraith Frightened Conservatives: Power in Economics, Economists’ Power, and Scientificity," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 31-56, January.
    6. James Ronald Stanfield, 1991. "The Dichotomized State," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 765-780, September.
    7. Roger E. Backhouse & Steven G. Medema, 2009. "Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 221-233, Winter.
    8. Charles G. Leathers, 1989. "Thorstein Veblen's Theories of Governmental Failure: The Critic of Capitalism and Democracy Neglected Some Useful Insights, Hindsight Shows," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 293-306, July.
    9. Tae-Hee Jo, 2019. "The Institutionalist Theory of the Business Enterprise: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 597-611, July.
    10. John S. Evans & Charles G. Leathers, 1980. "Veblen on Owners, Managers, and the Control of Industry: A Reply," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 441-448, Fall.
    11. Morris A. Copeland, 1967. "Laissez Faire, Pecuniary Incentives, and Public Policy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(4), pages 335-348, December.
    12. Gardiner C. Means, 1931. "The Separation of Ownership and Control in American Industry," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 46(1), pages 68-100.
    13. Charles G. Leathers & John S. Evans, 1973. "Thorstein Veblen and the New Industrial State," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 420-437, Fall.
    14. J. K. Galbraith, 1936. "Monopoly Power and Price Rigidities," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 50(3), pages 456-475.
    15. Rick Tilman, 1974. "Apology and Ambiguity: Adolf Berle on Corporate Power," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 111-126, March.
    16. Rick Tilman, 1984. "Dewey’s Liberalism versus Veblen’s Radicalism: A Reappraisal of the Unity of Progressive Social Thought," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 745-769, September.
    17. Claude d'Aspremont & Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira & Louis-André Gérard-Varet, 2011. "Imperfect Competition and the Trade Cycle: Aborted Guidelines from the Late 1930s," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 513-536, Fall.
    18. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "A reappraisal of Galbraith’s challenge to Consumer Sovereignty: preferences, welfare and the non-neutrality thesis," Post-Print halshs-02467176, HAL.
    19. Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1970. "Economics as a System of Belief," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 469-478, May.
    20. E. H. Chamberlin, 1929. "Duopoly: Value Where Sellers Are Few," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 44(1), pages 63-100.
    21. Gardiner C. Means, 1931. "Stock Dividends, Large Scale Business, and Corporate Savings — A Criticism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 45(3), pages 536-540.
    22. J. Maurice Clark, 1916. "The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(3), pages 209-209.
    23. Rutherford,Malcolm, 2013. "The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107626089, October.
    24. Laure Bazzoli & Véronique Dutraive, 2013. "La contribution de la philosophie sociale de John Dewey à une philosophie critique de l'économie," Post-Print halshs-00908859, HAL.
    25. Veblen, Thorstein, 1904. "Theory of Business Enterprise," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1904.
    26. Craufurd Goodwin, 2013. "Walter Lippmann: The Making of a Public Economist," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(5), pages 92-113, Supplemen.
    27. Charles K. Wilber & Robert S. Harrison, 1978. "The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling, and Holism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 61-89, March.
    28. Marris, Robin, 1972. "Is the Corporate Economy a Corporate State?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 103-115, May.
    29. Malcolm Rutherford, 1981. "Veblen on Owners, Managers, and the Control of Industry: A Rejoinder," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 156-158, Spring.
    30. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "A reappraisal of Galbraith’s challenge to Consumer Sovereignty: Preferences, welfare and the non-neutrality thesis," Post-Print hal-03339806, HAL.
    31. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "The correspondence between Baumol and Galbraith (1957–1958) - An unsuspected source of managerial theories of the firm," Working Papers 2020-07, CRESE.
    32. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "A reappraisal of Galbraith’s challenge to Consumer Sovereignty: preferences, welfare and the non-neutrality thesis," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 248-275, March.
    33. John E. Elliott, 1958. "Economic Planning Reconsidered," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 72(1), pages 55-76.
    34. Adolf A. Berle, 1965. "The Impact of the Corporation on Classical Economic Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 79(1), pages 25-40.
    35. John Kenneth Galbraith, 1983. "The Anatomy of Power," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 26-33, July.
    36. Roger E. Backhouse, 2015. "Economic Power and the Financial Machine: Competing Conceptions of Market Failure in the Great Depression," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 47(5), pages 99-126, Supplemen.
    37. Robert Theobald, 1963. "Poverty in the Affluent Society," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 22-24, January.
    38. Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1973. "Power and the Useful Economist," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(1), pages 1-11, March.
    39. Veblen, Thorstein, 1921. "The Engineers and the Price System," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1921.
    40. Widmaier,Wesley W., 2016. "Economic Ideas in Political Time," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316604571, October.
    41. Edward S. Mason, 1958. "The Apologetics of "Managerialism"," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31, pages 1-1.
    42. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "Galbraith, John Kenneth," Post-Print hal-03639386, HAL.
    43. Walter Adams, 1953. "Competition, Monopoly and Countervailing Power," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 67(4), pages 469-492.
    44. Stefan Kesting, 2005. "Countervailing, conditioned, and contingent--the power theory of John Kenneth Galbraith," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 3-23.
    45. J. Maurice Clark, 1923. "Overhead Costs in Modern Industry: II," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 209-209.
    46. Alexandre Chirat, 2018. "When Galbraith frightened conservatives: Power in Economics, Economists' Power and Scientificity," Post-Print hal-01725054, HAL.
    47. J. M. Clark, 1923. "Overhead Costs in Modern Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(5), pages 606-606.
    48. Tim Barker, 2019. "Macroeconomic Consequences of Peace: American Radical Economists and the Problem of Military Keynesianism, 1938–1975," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including A Symposium on 50 Years of the Union for Radical Political Economics, volume 37, pages 11-29, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    49. Widmaier,Wesley W., 2016. "Economic Ideas in Political Time," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107150317, October.
    50. Adolf. A. Berle, 1966. "The Antitrust Laws Should Be Changed," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 18-21, September.
    51. John Kay, 2019. "The concept of the corporation," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(7), pages 1129-1143, October.
    52. Gardiner C. Means, 1930. "The Diffusion of Stock Ownership in the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 44(4), pages 561-600.
    53. Malcolm Rutherford, 1980. "Veblen on Owners, Managers, and the Control of Industry," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 434-440, Fall.
    54. Forest G. Hill, 1967. "Veblen, Berle and the Modern Corporation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 279-295, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers of BETA 2017-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "The correspondence between Baumol and Galbraith (1957–1958) An unsuspected source of managerial theories of the firm," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-35, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    3. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers 08-17, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    4. Alexandre Chirat, 2022. "Consumer sovereignty in the digital society," EconomiX Working Papers 2022-25, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Davanzati, Guglielmo Forges, 2018. "Structural change driven by institutions: Thorstein veblen revised," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 105-110.
    6. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2021. "Reconciling normative and behavioural economics: the problem that cannot be solved," Post-Print halshs-03418228, HAL.
    7. Alexandre Chirat, 2020. "Démocratie de la demande versus démocratie de l’offre : Reconstruction et interprétation des analogies démocratie-marché," Working Papers 2020-10, CRESE.
    8. Guglielmo Forges Davanzati, 2016. "Thorstein Veblen on the nature of the firm and income distribution," Working Papers PKWP1618, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    9. Ferguson-Cradler, Gregory, 2020. "Ownership in the electricity market: Property, the firm, and the climate crisis," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Yulia Gruzina & Irina Firsova & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Dynamics of Human Capital Development in Economic Development Cycles," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2021. "Who's Afraid of Incoherence? Behavioural Welfare Economics and the Sovereignty of the Neoclassical Consumer," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-01, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    12. Alexandre Chirat & Basile Clerc, 2023. "Convergence on inflation and divergence on price-control among Post-Keynesian pioneers: insights from Galbraith and Lerner," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-4, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    13. Roger Backhouse & Beatrice Cherrier, 2014. "Becoming Applied: The Transformation of Economics after 1970," Discussion Papers 14-11, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    14. Timothy Wunder & Thomas Kemp, 2008. "Institutionalism and the State: Founding Views Reexamined," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 27-42, January.
    15. Laurent Linnemer, 2022. "Doubling Back on Double Marginalization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 61(1), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "A Heterodox Microfoundation of Business Cycles," Chapters, in: Joëlle Leclaire & Tae-Hee Jo & Jane Knodell (ed.), Heterodox Analysis of Financial Crisis and Reform, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Eduardo Fernández-Huerga & Ana Pardo & Ana Salvador, 2023. "Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 413-443, July.
    18. Stefan Angrick, 2018. "Structural conditions for currency internationalization: international finance and the survival constraint," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 699-725, September.
    19. James V. Cornehls, 2004. "Veblen’s Theory of Finance Capitalism and Contemporary Corporate America," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 29-58, March.
    20. Clare Virginia Eby, 1998. "Veblen’s Assault on Time," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 689-707, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    institutionalism - managerialism - liberalism - political economy.;

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:drm:wpaper:2021-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valerie Mignon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/modemfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.