IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vic/vicddp/0103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional Economics at Columbia University

Author

Abstract

In the interwar period, institutionalism was a very major part of American economics. The main centers for institutionalism were the University of Chicago (until 1926 and the departure of J. M. Clark), the University of Wisconsin, the Robert Brookings Graduate School (which existed only briefly between 1923 and 1928), and, after the arrival of Wesley Mitchell in 1913, and J. M. Clark in 1926, Columbia University. Columbia University became the academic home of a large concentration of economists of institutionalist leaning, and other Schools and Departments in the University, particularly Business, Law, Sociology, and Philosophy, also contained many people of similar or related persuasion. Taken in aggregate, Columbia has to rank as the largest and most important center for institutional economics from the mid 1920s to the late 1940s. This paper traces the history of institutionalism at Columbia begining with Wesley Mitchell's appointment in 1913. The institutionalist contingent grew rapidly to include F. C. Mills, Robert Hale, James Bonbright, Rexford Tugwell, and J. M. Clark. Mitchell's National Bureau of Economic Research, founded in 1920, was also a center for Mitchell's quantitative institutionalism and employed many Columbia graduates and faculty. In addition Gardiner Means was employed in the Law School working with Adolf A. Berle, and there were close links between institutionalists and the legal realist movement in law. In the early 1930's Carter Goodrich, Leo Wolman, and Joseph Dorfman were added to the economics faculty. The work produced by this institutionalist contingent and their graduate students is examined. After that, institutionalism began to decline in its professional standing. At Columbia, this was reflected in a growing concern with the Department's relative weakness in theory, and, in 1947, the hiring of Albert Hart, George Stigler, and William Vickrey. Institutionalism did not renew itself at Columbia and gradually faded from the Department with the retirement of the older generation of faculty.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Institutional Economics at Columbia University," Department Discussion Papers 0103, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
  • Handle: RePEc:vic:vicddp:0103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.uvic.ca/socialsciences/economics/_assets/docs/discussion/ddp0103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Becchio Giandomenica, 2009. "A historical reconstruction of the connections between the Viennese neopositivists and the American pragmatists: economic theory in the project for the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science," CESMEP Working Papers 200904, University of Turin.
    2. Malcolm Rutherford, 2010. "Chicago Economics and Institutionalism," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    4. Giandomenica Becchio, 2013. "Economics in the International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 145-153.
    5. Valerie Brender, 2010. "Economic Transformations in Chile: The Formation of the Chicago Boys," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 111-122, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B1 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925
    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vic:vicddp:0103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kali Moon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/devicca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.