IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cwl/cwldpp/1269.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equivalence of the Higher-order Asymptotic Efficiency of k-step and Extremum Statistics

Author

Abstract

It is well known that a one-step scoring estimator that starts from any N^{1/2}-consistent estimator has the same first-order asymptotic efficiency as the maximum likelihood estimator. This paper extends this result to k-step estimators and test statistics for k >= 1, higher-order asymptotic efficiency, and general extremum estimators and test statistics. The paper shows that a k-step estimator has the same higher-order asymptotic efficiency, to any given order, as the extremum estimator towards which it is stepping, provided (i) k is sufficiently large, (ii) some smoothness and moment conditions hold, and (iii) a condition on the initial estimator holds. For example, for the Newton-Raphson k-step estimator, we obtain asymptotic equivalence to integer order s provided 2^{k} >= s + 1. Thus, for k = 1, 2, and 3, one obtains asymptotic equivalence to first, third, and seventh orders respectively. This means that the maximum differences between the probabilities that the (N^{1/2}-normalized) k-step and extremum estimators lie in any convex set are o(1), o(N^{-3/2}), and o(N^{-3}) respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald W.K. Andrews, 2000. "Equivalence of the Higher-order Asymptotic Efficiency of k-step and Extremum Statistics," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1269, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:1269
    Note: CFP 1044.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d12/d1269.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfanzagl, J. & Wefelmeyer, W., 1978. "A third-order optimum property of the maximum likelihood estimator," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Rothenberg, Thomas J., 1984. "Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Z. Griliches† & M. D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 881-935, Elsevier.
    3. Robinson, Peter M, 1988. "The Stochastic Difference between Econometric Statistics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 531-548, May.
    4. Hall, Peter & Horowitz, Joel L, 1996. "Bootstrap Critical Values for Tests Based on Generalized-Method-of-Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 891-916, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hiroyuki Kasahara & Katsumi Shimotsu, 2006. "Nested Pseudo-likelihood Estimation And Bootstrap-based Inference For Structural Discrete Markov Decision Models," Working Paper 1063, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    2. Arvanitis Stelios & Demos Antonis, 2018. "On the Validity of Edgeworth Expansions and Moment Approximations for Three Indirect Inference Estimators," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, January.
    3. Inoue, Atsushi & Shintani, Mototsugu, 2006. "Bootstrapping GMM estimators for time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 531-555, August.
    4. Fan, Yanqin & Gentry, Matthew & Li, Tong, 2011. "A new class of asymptotically efficient estimators for moment condition models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 268-277, June.
    5. Xuexin Wang, 2020. "A new class of tests for overidentifying restrictions in moment condition models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 495-509, May.
    6. Dennis Kristensen & Bernard Salanié, 2010. "Higher Order Improvements for Approximate Estimators," CAM Working Papers 2010-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics.
    7. Stelios Arvanitis & Antonis Demos, 2015. "A class of indirect inference estimators: higher‐order asymptotics and approximate bias correction," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(2), pages 200-241, June.
    8. Antonis Demos & Stelios Arvanitis, 2010. "Stochastic Expansions and Moment Approximations for Three Indirect Estimators," DEOS Working Papers 1004, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    9. Yixiao Sun & Peter C.B. Phillips, 2008. "Optimal Bandwidth Choice for Interval Estimation in GMM Regression," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1661, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Rasmus Tangsgaard Varneskov, 2011. "Generalized Flat-Top Realized Kernel Estimation of Ex-Post Variation of Asset Prices Contaminated by Noise," CREATES Research Papers 2011-31, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    11. Antonis Demos & Stelios Arvanitis, 2010. "A New Class of Indirect Estimators and Bias Correction," DEOS Working Papers 1023, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    12. Politis, D N, 2009. "Higher-Order Accurate, Positive Semi-definite Estimation of Large-Sample Covariance and Spectral Density Matrices," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt66w826hz, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    13. Paulo M.D.C. Parente & Richard J. Smith, 2018. "Generalised Empirical Likelihood Kernel Block Bootstrapping," Working Papers REM 2018/55, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    14. Arvanitis Stelios & Demos Antonis, 2014. "Valid Locally Uniform Edgeworth Expansions for a Class of Weakly Dependent Processes or Sequences of Smooth Transformations," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-53, July.
    15. Kasahara, Hiroyuki & Shimotsu, Katsumi, 2008. "Pseudo-likelihood estimation and bootstrap inference for structural discrete Markov decision models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 92-106, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Creel & Dennis Kristensen, "undated". "Indirect Likelihood Inference," Working Papers 558, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Kundhi, Gubhinder & Rilstone, Paul, 2012. "Edgeworth expansions for GEL estimators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 118-146.
    3. Jinyong Hahn & David W. Hughes & Guido Kuersteiner & Whitney K. Newey, 2022. "Efficient Bias Correction for Cross-section and Panel Data," Papers 2207.09943, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    4. Rilstone, Paul & Srivastava, V. K. & Ullah, Aman, 1996. "The second-order bias and mean squared error of nonlinear estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 369-395, December.
    5. Antoine, Bertille & Bonnal, Helene & Renault, Eric, 2007. "On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and Euclidean empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 461-487, June.
    6. Hill, Jonathan B. & Prokhorov, Artem, 2016. "GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 18-45.
    7. Linton, Oliver, 1995. "Second Order Approximation in the Partially Linear Regression Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(5), pages 1079-1112, September.
    8. Kyoo il Kim, 2006. "Higher Order Bias Correcting Moment Equation for M-Estimation and its Higher Order Efficiency," Labor Economics Working Papers 22453, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Paul Rilstone, 2021. "Higher-Order Stochastic Expansions and Approximate Moments for Non-linear Models with Heterogeneous Observations," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(1), pages 99-120, December.
    10. Kristensen, Dennis & Salanié, Bernard, 2017. "Higher-order properties of approximate estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 189-208.
    11. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    12. Prosper Dovonon, 2016. "Large Sample Properties of the Three-Step Euclidean Likelihood Estimators under Model Misspecification," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 465-514, April.
    13. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2004. "Estimating average partial effects under conditional moment independence assumptions," CeMMAP working papers CWP03/04, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Gubhinder Kundhi & Paul Rilstone, 2015. "Saddlepoint expansions for GEL estimators," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Yixiao Sun & Peter C.B. Phillips, 2008. "Optimal Bandwidth Choice for Interval Estimation in GMM Regression," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1661, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    16. Inoue, Atsushi & Shintani, Mototsugu, 2006. "Bootstrapping GMM estimators for time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 531-555, August.
    17. Kyoo Il Kim, 2016. "Higher Order Bias Correcting Moment Equation for M-Estimation and Its Higher Order Efficiency," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Grigory Franguridi & Bulat Gafarov & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2021. "Conditional Quantile Estimators: A Small Sample Theory," CESifo Working Paper Series 9046, CESifo.
    19. repec:wyi:journl:002162 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Frank Kleibergen, 2004. "Expansions of GMM statistics that indicate their properties under weak and/or many instruments and the bootstrap," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 408, Econometric Society.
    21. Hwang, Jungbin & Kang, Byunghoon & Lee, Seojeong, 2022. "A doubly corrected robust variance estimator for linear GMM," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 276-298.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asymptotics; Edgeworth expansion; extremum estimator; Gauss-Newton; higher-order efficiency; Newton-Raphson.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:1269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brittany Ladd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cowleus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.