IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cty/dpaper/08-03.html

An Analysis of Settlement Risk Contagion in Alternative Securities Settlement Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Iori, G.
  • Deissenberg, C.

Abstract

This paper compares the so-called gross and net architectures for securities settlement. It studies the settlement risk arising from exogenous operational delays and compares the importance of settlement failures under the two architectures, as a function of the length of the settlement cycle and of different market conditions. Under both architectures, settlement failures are non-monotonically related to the length of settlement cycle. There is no evidence that continuous time settlement provides always higher stability. Gross systems appear to be more stable than net systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Iori, G. & Deissenberg, C., 2008. "An Analysis of Settlement Risk Contagion in Alternative Securities Settlement Architecture," Working Papers 08/03, Department of Economics, City St George's, University of London.
    • Handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:08/03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/1481/1/0803_iori-deissenberg.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devriese, Johan & Mitchell, Janet, 2006. "Liquidity risk in securities settlement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1807-1834, June.
    2. Koponen, Risto & Soramäki, Kimmo, 1998. "Intraday liquidity needs in a modern interbank payment system : A simulation approach," Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, number 1998_014.
    3. Leinonen, Harry, 2003. "Restructuring securities systems processing : A blue print proposal for real-time/t+0 processing," Research Discussion Papers 7/2003, Bank of Finland.
    4. Holthausen, Cornelia & Tapking, Jens, 2007. "Raising rival's costs in the securities settlement industry," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 91-116, January.
    5. Leinonen, Harry, 2005. "Liquidity, risks and speed in payment and settlement systems : a simulation approach," Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, number 2005_031.
    6. Leinonen, Harry & Soramäki, Kimmo, 1999. "Optimizing liquidity usage and settlement speed in payment systems," Research Discussion Papers 16/1999, Bank of Finland.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leinonen, Harry & Soramäki, Kimmo, 2003. "Simulating interbank payments and securities settlement mechanism with the BoF-PSS2 simulator," Research Discussion Papers 23/2003, Bank of Finland.
    2. Galbiati, Marco & Soramäki, Kimmo, 2011. "An agent-based model of payment systems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 859-875, June.
    3. Kemppainen, Kari, 2003. "Competition and regulation in European retail payment systems," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 16/2003, Bank of Finland.
    4. Michele Manna & Carmela Iazzetta, 2009. "The topology of the interbank market: developments in Italy since 1990," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 711, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Leinonen, Harry (ed.), 2007. "Simulation studies of liquidity needs, risks and efficiency in payment networks: Proceedings from the Bank of Finland Payment and Settlement System Seminars 2005-2006," Bank of Finland Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, volume 0, number sm2007_039, December.
    6. Milne, Alistair, 2007. "The industrial organization of post-trade clearing and settlement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 2945-2961, October.
    7. Kurt Johnson & James J. McAndrews & Kimmo Soramaki, 2004. "Economizing on liquidity with deferred settlement mechanisms," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Dec, pages 51-72.
    8. Kemppainen, Kari, 2003. "Competition and regulation in European retail payment systems," Research Discussion Papers 16/2003, Bank of Finland.
    9. Jan Willem van den End, 2010. "Liquidity Stress-Tester: A Model for Stress-testing Banks' Liquidity Risk," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo, vol. 56(1), pages 38-69, March.
    10. Droll, Thomas & Podlich, Natalia & Wedow, Michael, 2016. "Out of sight, out of mind? On the risk of sub-custodian structures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    11. Morten L. Bech & Christine Preisig & Kimmo Soramaki, 2008. "Global trends in large-value payments," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 14(Sep), pages 59-81.
    12. Jukka Vauhkonen, 2004. "Banks' equity stakes in borrowing firms: A corporate finance approach," Game Theory and Information 0404003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Tomaž Fleischman & Paolo Dini, 2021. "Mathematical Foundations for Balancing the Payment System in the Trade Credit Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Fleischman, Tomaž & Dini, Paolo, 2021. "Mathematical foundations for balancing the payment system in the trade credit market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112151, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Degryse, H.A. & van Achter, M. & Wuyts, G., 2012. "Internalization, Clearing and Settlement, and Liquidity," Other publications TiSEM 3744cb8d-b4ce-47a1-9abd-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Steffen Juranek & Uwe Walz, 2020. "Organizational Design, Competition, and Financial Exchanges," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(1), pages 132-163, January.
    17. A. Larionov V. & E. Salina S. & А. Ларионов В. & Е. Салина С., 2019. "Регулирование и оценка рисков деятельности платежных систем // Regulation and Risk Assessment of Payment Systems," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 9(3), pages 40-55.
    18. Ripatti, Kirsi, 2004. "Central counterparty clearing: constructing a framework for evaluation of risks and benefits," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 30/2004, Bank of Finland.
    19. repec:mbr:jmonec:v:6:y:2011:i:1:p:151-160 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hans Degryse & Mark Van Achter & Gunther Wuyts, 2022. "Plumbing of Securities Markets: The Impact of Post-trade Fees on Trading and Welfare," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 635-653, January.
    21. Serge Jeanneau & Camilo E Tovar, 2008. "Financial stability implications of local currency bond markets: an overview of the risks," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), New financing trends in Latin America: a bumpy road towards stability, volume 36, pages 65-87, Bank for International Settlements.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:08/03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Publications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decituk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.