IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cth/wpaper/gru_2016_002.html

FDI Technology Spillovers, Geography, and Spatial Diffusion

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Lin

    (University of Lincoln)

  • Yum K. Kwan

    (City University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

This paper investigates the geographic extent of FDI technology spillovers and associated spatial diffusion. By adopting a spatiotemporal autoregressive panel model as the platform of our study, the complex impact resulting from FDI penetration is separated into spatial direct and indirect effects while accounting for feedback loops among regions. A set of spatially partitioned summary measures is produced to identify and to quantify FDI spillovers from different channels with distinct geographic scopes. Empirical results based on data from China document that the direct impacts of FDI presence to a specific location itself are likely to be negative. Domestic firms mainly benefit from FDI presence in their neighboring regions through knowledge spillovers that have wider geographic scope. Negative market stealing effect nevertheless has no spatial boundary. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Lin & Yum K. Kwan, "undated". "FDI Technology Spillovers, Geography, and Spatial Diffusion," GRU Working Paper Series GRU_2016_002, City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit.
    • Handle: RePEc:cth:wpaper:gru_2016_002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cb.cityu.edu.hk/ef/doc/GRU/WPS/GRU%232016-002%20Fred%20Kwan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Xiuzhi He & Samiha Khan & Ilhan Ozturk & Muntasir Murshed, 2023. "The role of renewable energy investment in tackling climate change concerns: Environmental policies for achieving SDG‐13," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1888-1901, June.
    3. Moralles, Herick Fernando & Moreno, Rosina, 2020. "FDI productivity spillovers and absorptive capacity in Brazilian firms: A threshold regression analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 257-272.
    4. Hu, Feng & Xi, Xun & Zhang, Yueyue, 2021. "Influencing mechanism of reverse knowledge spillover on investment enterprises’ technological progress: An empirical examination of Chinese firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Faris Alshubiri & Abdullah AlGhazali, 2025. "Does Terrorism Hamper Foreign Greenfield Investment Inflows? Empirical Evidence from MENA Countries," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 32(2), pages 711-742, June.
    6. Toan Pham-Khanh Tran & Phuc Van Nguyen & Quyen Le-Hoang-Thuy-To Nguyen & Ngoc Phu Tran & Duc Hong Vo, 2022. "Does national intellectual capital matter for shadow economy in the Southeast Asian countries?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Eristian Wibisono, 2023. "Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Spillovers in Visegrad Countries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2301, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2023.
    8. Pan, Yuling & Dong, Feng, 2022. "Dynamic evolution and driving factors of new energy development: Fresh evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Li, Guoxing & Yeh, Yin-Hua, 2023. "Western cultural influence on corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Feng, Wei & Li, Jiajia, 2021. "International technology spillovers and innovation quality: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 289-308.
    12. Feng, Wei & Yuan, Hang, 2025. "The impact of international technology spillovers on digital inequality in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Song, Wenfei & Han, Xianfeng, 2022. "The bilateral effects of foreign direct investment on green innovation efficiency: Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    14. Yang, Zixin & Song, Xiaojun & Yu, Jihai, 2025. "Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with nonparametric endogenous effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PA).
    15. Vujanović, Nina & Stojčić, Nebojša & Hashi, Iraj, 2021. "FDI spillovers and firm productivity during crisis: Empirical evidence from transition economies," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    16. Giorgio Prodi & Francesco Nicolli & Federico Frattini, 2020. "Embeddedness and local patterns of innovation: evidence from Chinese prefectural cities," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Keun Lee (ed.), Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development, pages 283-307, Springer.
    17. Pushkarev, A. A., 2018. "Cluster analysis of regional innovation activity in Russia in 2010-2015," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 4(1), pages 10-17.
    18. Stojčić, Nebojša & Aralica, Zoran & Anić, Ivan-Damir, 2019. "Spatio-temporal determinants of the structural and productive transformation of regions in Central and East European countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(3).
    19. Song, Young Chul & Son, Sung Hyun, 2020. "Identifying the impact of geographical proximity on spillover effect of FDI: The evidence from Indian local firms’ performance gains," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Nicola Cortinovis & Riccardo Crescenzi & Frank van Oort, 2020. "Multinational enterprises, industrial relatedness and employment in European regions [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1165-1205.
    21. Pan, Xiongfeng & Wang, Yuqing & Tian, Mengyuan & Feng, Shenghan & Ai, Bowei, 2023. "Spatio-temporal impulse effect of foreign direct investment on intra- and inter-regional carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    22. Polyxeni, Kechagia & Theodore, Metaxas, 2019. "An empirical investigation of FDI inflows in developing economies: Terrorism as a determinant factor," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    23. Zhang, Jie & Chen, Jiwei & Chen, Guohui & Zhi, Manlin, 2025. "The temporal and spatial dynamics of FDI productivity spillovers: A technology gap perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    24. Charlotte Chapelain & Ralf A. Wilke, 2025. "Spatial patterns of steam technology diffusion in nineteenth-century France," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 19(3), pages 561-590, September.
    25. Sajid Anwar & Sizhong Sun, 2019. "Firm heterogeneity and FDI-related productivity spillovers: A theoretical investigation," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cth:wpaper:gru_2016_002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: GRU The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask GRU to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decithk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.