IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/35425.html

On data-driven chance constraint learning for mixed-integer optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Alcántara Mata, Antonio
  • Ruiz Mora, Carlos

Abstract

When dealing with real-world optimization problems, decision-makers usually face high levels of uncertainty associated with partial information, unknown parameters, or complex relationships between these and the problem decision variables. In this work, we develop a novel Chance Constraint Learning (CCL) methodology with a focus on mixedinteger linear optimization problems which combines ideas from the chance constraint and constraint learning literature. Chance constraints set a probabilistic confidence level for a single or a set of constraints to be fulfilled, whereas the constraint learning methodology aims to model the functional relationship between the problem variables through predictive models. One of the main issues when establishing a learned constraint arises when we need to set further bounds for its response variable: the fulfillment of these is directly related to the accuracy of the predictive model and its probabilistic behaviour. In this sense, CCL makes use of linearizable machine learning models to estimate conditional quantiles of the learned variables, providing a data-driven solution for chance constraints. An open-access software has been developed to be used by practitioners. Furthermore, benefits from CCL have been tested in two real-world case studies, proving how robustness is added to optimal solutions when probabilistic bounds are set for learned constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Alcántara Mata, Antonio & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2022. "On data-driven chance constraint learning for mixed-integer optimization problems," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35425, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:35425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/26c98b1c-7418-45b0-8bc1-79e80886e192/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Tyrrell Rockafellar & Stan Uryasev & Michael Zabarankin, 2008. "Risk Tuning with Generalized Linear Regression," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 712-729, August.
    2. Rockafellar, R.T. & Royset, J.O., 2010. "On buffered failure probability in design and optimization of structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 499-510.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1025-1044, March.
    4. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    5. William E. Hart & Carl D. Laird & Jean-Paul Watson & David L. Woodruff & Gabriel A. Hackebeil & Bethany L. Nicholson & John D. Siirola, 2017. "Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-58821-6, January.
    6. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rockafellar, R.T. & Royset, J.O. & Miranda, S.I., 2014. "Superquantile regression with applications to buffered reliability, uncertainty quantification, and conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 140-154.
    2. Joaquim Dias Garcia & Alexandre Street & Tito Homem-de-Mello & Francisco D. Muñoz, 2025. "Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 22-39, January.
    3. Alcántara Mata, Antonio & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2022. "A Neural Network-Based Distributional Constraint Learning Methodology for Mixed-Integer Stochastic Optimization," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 36072, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    4. Mafusalov, Alexander & Uryasev, Stan, 2016. "CVaR (superquantile) norm: Stochastic case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 200-208.
    5. Bogdan Grechuk & Anton Malandii & Terry Rockafellar & Stan Uryasev, 2026. "The Risk Quadrangle in Optimization: An Overview with Recent Results and Extensions," Papers 2603.27370, arXiv.org.
    6. R. Tyrrell Rockafellar & Johannes O. Royset, 2018. "Superquantile/CVaR risk measures: second-order theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 3-28, March.
    7. Jakeman, John D. & Kouri, Drew P. & Huerta, J. Gabriel, 2022. "Surrogate modeling for efficiently, accurately and conservatively estimating measures of risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Alcántara Mata, Antonio & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2022. "Optimal day-ahead offering strategy for large producers based on market price response learning," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 34605, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Notz, Pascal M. & Pibernik, Richard, 2024. "Explainable subgradient tree boosting for prescriptive analytics in operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1119-1133.
    10. Kim, Woo-sung & Song, Mihyeong & Jeong, Mincheol & Jung, Seung Hwan, 2025. "A supervised learning-based optimization for container pre-loading problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    11. Mansoor, Umer & Jamal, Arshad & Su, Junbiao & Sze, N.N. & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Investigating the risk factors of motorcycle crash injury severity in Pakistan: Insights and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 21-38.
    12. Matthew Smith & Francisco Alvarez, 2022. "Predicting Firm-Level Bankruptcy in the Spanish Economy Using Extreme Gradient Boosting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 263-295, January.
    13. Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Marival & Trull-Domínguez, Óscar & Sánchez-Planelles, Joaquín, 2022. "Exposing the ideal combination of endogenous–exogenous drivers for companies’ ecoinnovative orientation: Results from machine-learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Richard Berk, 2019. "Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 175-194, March.
    15. Paul, Aditya & Levin, Michael W. & Waller, S. Travis & Rey, David, 2025. "Data-driven optimization for drone delivery service planning with online demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Robert Suchting & Michael S. Businelle & Stephen W. Hwang & Nikhil S. Padhye & Yijiong Yang & Diane M. Santa Maria, 2020. "Predicting Daily Sheltering Arrangements among Youth Experiencing Homelessness Using Diary Measurements Collected by Ecological Momentary Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Ylinen, Mika & Ranta, Mikko, 2025. "Predicting corporate innovation using machine learning and social media data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    19. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    20. Tian, Xuecheng & Yan, Ran & Liu, Yannick & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "A smart predict-then-optimize method for targeted and cost-effective maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 32-52.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:35425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.