IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/whrepe/50618.html

Financing Property Rights: Fee-Financed Registration and Unequal Formalisation in Spain, 1845-1935

Author

Listed:
  • Carmona, Juan
  • Rosés, Joan R.

Abstract

This paper argues that the financing model of property-rights institutions is a central determinant of their distributional consequences. Following the Napoleonic reforms, Spain’s Liberal governments created a modern, nationally integrated land registry, but financed access through user fees and tied registration to the collection of transfer taxes. This arrangement reduced the administrative cost of reform and gave the Treasury revenue from transactions at a time when the cadastral basis of direct land taxation was increasingly obsolete. Yet it also created a regressive access regime: because notarial fees, registry charges, and taxes were largely fixed, the proportional cost of formalisation was highest for low-value and fragmented properties. Drawing on fee schedules, fiscal series, and provincial evidence, the paper reconstructs this cost structure, documents the growing fiscal weight of transaction taxation, and shows that the incidence of formalisation costs was greatest where registry participation was weakest. Because the exclusion was produced by pricing rather than by incomplete coverage, extending such a registry need not narrow inequality and may reproduce it. Spain’s experience shows that a legally universal propertyrights institution could remain economically unequal in practice, and that the funding model should be treated as a first-order variable in explaining its historical performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmona, Juan & Rosés, Joan R., 2026. "Financing Property Rights: Fee-Financed Registration and Unequal Formalisation in Spain, 1845-1935," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH 50618, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:whrepe:50618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/9def4304-e629-4702-be7b-d7808f1ea53a/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Davide Cantoni & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2011. "The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3286-3307, December.
    2. Michelle D’Arcy & Marina Nistotskaya & Ola Olsson, 2024. "Cadasters and Economic Growth: A Long-Run Cross-Country Panel," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(11), pages 3785-3826.
    3. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2017. "Spanish Economic Growth, 1850–2015," Palgrave Studies in Economic History, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-58042-5, September.
    4. Juan Carmona & Joan R. Rosés, 2012. "Land markets and agrarian backwardness (Spain, 1904-1934)," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 74-96, February.
    5. Arrunada, Benito & Garoupa, Nuno, 2005. "The Choice of Titling System in Land," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 709-727, October.
    6. François Crouzet, 2003. "The historiography of French economic growth in the nineteenth century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 56(2), pages 215-242, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kopsidis, Michael, 2024. "Zur ökonomischen Analyse frühneuzeitlicher Agrarentwicklung in Europa: Familiensysteme, bäuerliche Handlungslogiken und Rechtsrahmen," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Das französische Ancien Régime als Eigentümergesellschaft?, pages 1-42, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Benito Arruñada & Marco Fabbri & Daniele Nosenzo & Giorgio Zanarone, 2025. "Insider Collusion as a Threat to Property Rights: Experimental Evidence from West Africa," Working Papers 2025-11, FEDEA.
    3. Theresa Finley & Raphaël Franck & Noel D. Johnson, 2021. "The Effects of Land Redistribution: Evidence from the French Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(2), pages 233-267.
    4. Klaus W. Deininger & Thea Hilhorst & Zevenbergen,Jaap & Nkurunziza,Emmanuel, 2025. "Capitalizing on Digital Transformation to Enhance the Effectiveness of Property Institutions : Conceptual Background and Evidence from 85 Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11100, The World Bank.
    5. Brousseau, Eric & Garrouste, Pierre & Raynaud, Emmanuel, 2011. "Institutional changes: Alternative theories and consequences for institutional design," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 3-19.
    6. Benito Arruñada & Marco Fabbri & Michael Faure, 2022. "Land Titling and Litigation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(1), pages 131-156.
    7. Cédric Chambru & Emeric Henry & Benjamin Marx, 2024. "The Dynamic Consequences of State Building: Evidence from the French Revolution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(11), pages 3578-3622, November.
    8. Dong, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Yongjing, 2016. "Accumulated social capital, institutional quality, and economic performance: Evidence from China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 206-219.
    9. Franck, Raphaël & Galor, Oded, 2021. "Flowers of evil? Industrialization and long run development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 108-128.
    10. Nahapetyan Yervand, 2019. "The benefits of the Velvet Revolution in Armenia: Estimation of the short-term economic gains using deep neural networks," Central European Economic Journal, Paradigm, vol. 6(53), pages 286-303, January.
    11. Mara P. Squicciarini & Nico Voigtländer, 2015. "Human Capital and Industrialization: Evidence from the Age of Enlightenment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1825-1883.
    12. Bai, Ying, 2019. "Farewell to confucianism: The modernizing effect of dismantling China's imperial examination system," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Juif, Dácil & Quiroga, Gloria, 2019. "Do you have to be tall and educated to be a migrant? Evidence from Spanish recruitment records, 1890–1950," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 115-124.
    14. Jan Schnellenbach, 2023. "The concept of Ordnungspolitik: rule-based economic policymaking from the perspective of the Freiburg School," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 283-300, June.
    15. Yanlong Zhang, 2021. "The Demsetz’s Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights as Applied to Rural Land of China: A Supplement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Sebastian Galiani & Ernesto Schargrodsky, 2011. "Land Property Rights and Resource Allocation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 329-345.
    17. Giampaolo Lecce & Laura Ogliari & Tommaso Orlando, 2017. "Resistance to Institutions and Cultural Distance: Brigandage in Post-Unification Italy," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2097R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Dec 2017.
    18. Wegner, Gerhard, 2013. "Capitalist transformation without political participation: German capitalism in the first half of the 19th century," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 13/14, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    19. Albers, Hakon & Pfister, Ulrich, 2023. "State formation and market integration: Germany, 1780–1830," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 403-421.
    20. Rok Spruk & Mitja Kovac, 2018. "Inefficient Growth," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 9(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N53 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • N54 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Europe: 1913-
    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:whrepe:50618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/instituto_figuerola .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.