IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Turning Point Prediction for the UK using CSO Leading Indicators

Listed author(s):
  • Artis, Michael J

This paper examines the performance of alternative models for predicting turning points in the UK growth cycle. The models are based upon an interpretation of movements in the CSO's composite longer and shorter leading indicators. The difference between the models lies in the choice of method adopted for separating and classifying observations into a pattern corresponding to an upturn and downturn regime, together with the decision rule applied in recognizing when a regime shift has occurred. The models involved include a simple mechanical rule based upon an interpretation of consecutive movements in the leading indicator and two probabilistic methods, namely a standard Bayesian model and the sequential probability model developed by Neftci (1982). The results of the exercise suggest that usefulness of the shorter leading index is extremely limited; prediction based upon this series is typically outperformed by naive, non-indicator methods. The information content of the longer leading index appears somewhat greater. The signal extracted by the sequential probability model is particularly well-defined in this respect giving rise to a lead time of between four and six months at peaks and six months for troughs. At horizons beyond six months, however, the sequential probability model is outperformed by a more conventional Bayesian method.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 833.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 1993
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:833
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.

Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820

Order Information: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.