IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000464/012356.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La Administración De Los Recursos Económicos Como Factor Decisivo En El Desarrollo Sostenible En Una Sociedad

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Stefania Pulido Aranzazu

Abstract

Resumen El desarrollo sostenible se compone de tres pilares independientes que se refuerzan mutuamente, estos son el económico, el social y el ambiental. El desarrollo económico tiene estrecha relación con el funcionamiento financiero "clásico" y la creación de empresas de todos los niveles y está ligado con el social, ya que para satisfacer las necesidades de la sociedad, se requiere de un buen manejo de la economía. El desarrollo social permite evidenciar los impactos sociales de la actividad de la empresa en todos los niveles: los trabajadores, sus condiciones de trabajo, nivel salarial, los proveedores, los clientes, las comunidades locales y la sociedad en general, necesidades humanas básicas tales como alimentación, vestimenta, vivienda, y trabajo. El bienestar social está limitado por el nivel tecnológico y se relaciona directamente con los recursos del medio ambiente y la capacidad de este para absorber los efectos de la actividad humana. La protección del medio ambiente depende de la compatibilidad entre la actividad social de la empresa y la preservación de la biodiversidad y de los ecosistemas. En este ámbito es conveniente racionalizar el uso de los recursos naturales teniendo en cuenta lo soportable, viable y equitativo. Lo soportable alude a todos los problemas de contaminación, lluvia acida, gases de efecto invernadero, destrucción y fragmentación de los ecosistemas y demás inconvenientes que no permiten que nuestro medio ambiente se desarrolle en una forma sana. La viabilidad y la equidad son problemas relacionados con los pobres, en razón a que son los que más sufren la crisis ecológica y climática, pero de una u otra forma esto tiene que ser así, ya que si todo fuera similar y equitativo en todos los lugares del mundo, implicaría una degradación acelerada de la biosfera, ya que todos los recursos de la tierra no abastecerían las necesidades de los habitantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Stefania Pulido Aranzazu, 2012. "La Administración De Los Recursos Económicos Como Factor Decisivo En El Desarrollo Sostenible En Una Sociedad," Revista Isocuanta 12356, Universidad Santo Tomás.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000464:012356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/isocuanta/article/view/1404
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daly, Herman E., 1990. "Toward some operational principles of sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, April.
    2. Ehrlich, Paul R., 1989. "The limits to substitution: Meta-resource depletion and a new economic-ecological paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 9-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Teresa Ballestar & Miguel Cuerdo-Mir & María Teresa Freire-Rubio, 2020. "The Concept of Sustainability on Social Media: A Social Listening Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Ettore Bompard & Daniele Grosso & Tao Huang & Francesco Profumo & Xianzhang Lei & Duo Li, 2018. "World Decarbonization through Global Electricity Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Yeray Hernandez & Gustavo Naumann & Serafin Corral & Paulo Barbosa, 2020. "Water Footprint Expands with Gross Domestic Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-6, October.
    5. Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu & Alina-Simona Tecău & Ioana-Simona Ivasciuc & Adina-Nicoleta Candrea, 2020. "Permaculture and Downshifting-Sources of Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Toman, Michael & Pezzey, John C., 2002. "The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles," RFF Working Paper Series dp-02-03, Resources for the Future.
    7. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Toyosi K. Oye & Naren Gupta & Keng Goh & Abdelfateh Kerrouche & Tosin T. Oye, 2021. "Development of a Sustainable Theoretical Framework for a Renewable Based Bathroom Unit," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 10-35, August.
    9. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Paletto, Alessandro & Pastorella, Fabio & Granvik, Madeleine & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2018. "Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 411-424.
    10. Gilbert Gillespie, 2010. "2009 AFHVS presidential address: the steering question: challenges to achieving food system sustainability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(1), pages 3-12, March.
    11. Florian Fizaine, 2021. "La croissance verte est-elle durable et compatible avec l’économie circulaire ? Une approche par l’identité IPAT," Post-Print hal-03884377, HAL.
    12. Nelson, Julie A., 1997. "Feminism, ecology and the philosophy of economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 155-162, February.
    13. Templet, Paul H., 1995. "Grazing the commons: an empirical analysis of externalities, subsidies and sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 141-159, February.
    14. Ropke, Inge, 2005. "Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 262-290, November.
    15. Toman, Michael, 1998. "Sustainable Decisionmaking: The State of the Art from an Economics Perspective," RFF Working Paper Series dp-98-39, Resources for the Future.
    16. Sander E. van der Leeuw & Chr. Aschan-Leygonie, 2001. "A Long-Term Perspective on Resilience in Socio-Natural Systems," Working Papers 01-08-042, Santa Fe Institute.
    17. Llanez Anaya, Helmer Fernando & Sacristán Rodríguez, Claudia Patricia, 2021. "Desarrollo territorial y economía solidaria: análisis desde el concepto de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y la incorporación de las comunidades en una estrategia de desarrollo territorial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 22(1), pages 254-278, January.
    18. Frank den Butter, Marjan W. Hofkes, 2001. "Endogenous technology and environmental quality in economic models," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 32-44.
    19. Hoff, Jens V. & Rasmussen, Martin M.B. & Sørensen, Peter Birch, 2021. "Barriers and opportunities in developing and implementing a Green GDP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    recursos económicos; desarrollo sostenible; sociedad; medio ambiente; recursos naturales; conservación; sostenibilidad.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000464:012356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jorge Enrique Martínez Carvajal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/festaco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.