IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/emsd88/v10y2021i3p10-35.html

Development of a Sustainable Theoretical Framework for a Renewable Based Bathroom Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Toyosi K. Oye
  • Naren Gupta
  • Keng Goh
  • Abdelfateh Kerrouche
  • Tosin T. Oye

Abstract

One of the major issues facing the world in the 21st century is climate change. However, sustainability has become a crucial concept to combat extreme consumption of environmental resources. The bathroom has been estimated to be the principal user of environmental resources in United Kingdom households. Therefore, the challenge that how a combined water and energy saving unit in the bathroom will contribute to the sustainability of the houses will remain unresolved. This study challenges and extends existing knowledge on sustainability related to the smart bathroom systems considering social, environmental, and economic principles to achieve a highly efficient water and energy consumption in the bathroom. This study gathers that a range of technological challenges are based on the individual components and technologies in the bathroom and concludes that a holistic approach is required for an effective modelling in the bathroom. This allows the examination of energy and water flows in the complex systems, shaped by various social, economic and environmental forces. The method this study presented adopts conceptual and holistic modelling to design and implement a bathroom unit that is sustainable and smart. This study uncovers the contribution of renewable energy source and smart control technologies in the bathroom and the significant contribution it makes in levels of energy consumption and carbon emissions. These sustainable features are subsequently used to develop framework for sustainable for implementing and evaluation of sustainable bathroom system. This study has established a strong quantitative and qualitative links between three dimensions of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Toyosi K. Oye & Naren Gupta & Keng Goh & Abdelfateh Kerrouche & Tosin T. Oye, 2021. "Development of a Sustainable Theoretical Framework for a Renewable Based Bathroom Unit," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 10-35, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:10-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/view/18537/14462
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/view/18537
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daly, Herman E., 1990. "Toward some operational principles of sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ettore Bompard & Daniele Grosso & Tao Huang & Francesco Profumo & Xianzhang Lei & Duo Li, 2018. "World Decarbonization through Global Electricity Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu & Alina-Simona Tecău & Ioana-Simona Ivasciuc & Adina-Nicoleta Candrea, 2020. "Permaculture and Downshifting-Sources of Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Florian Fizaine, 2021. "La croissance verte est-elle durable et compatible avec l’économie circulaire ? Une approche par l’identité IPAT," Post-Print hal-03884377, HAL.
    5. Helmer Fernando Llanez Anaya & Claudia Patricia Sacristán Rodríguez, 2021. "Desarrollo territorial y economía solidaria: análisis desde el concepto de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y la incorporación de las comunidades en una estrategia de desarrollo territorial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 22(1), pages 254-278.
    6. Hoff, Jens V. & Rasmussen, Martin M.B. & Sørensen, Peter Birch, 2021. "Barriers and opportunities in developing and implementing a Green GDP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Patrick Ten Brink & Leonardo Mazza & Alison Ratliff & Emma Watkins, 2016. "Evidence of Absolute Decoupling from Real World Policy Mixes in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias, 2004. "Sustainable Value Added--measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 173-187, February.
    9. Tilman Santarius & Johanna Pohl & Steffen Lange, 2020. "Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Elisa Biagetti & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella & Ilenia Maria La Porta & Clara Cicatiello & Tommaso De Gregorio & Silvio Franco, 2023. "Is Hazelnut Farming Sustainable? An Analysis in the Specialized Production Area of Viterbo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-10, July.
    11. V.Martinet & L. Doyen, 2003. "Sustainable management of an exhaustible resource:a viable control model," Thema Working Papers 2003-36, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    12. Rennings, Klaus & Koschel, Henrike, 1995. "Externe Kosten der Energieversorgung und ihre Bedeutung im Konzept einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Entwicklung," ZEW Dokumentationen 95-06, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Jarmila Lazíková & Zuzana Lazíková & Ivan Takáč & Ľubica Rumanovská & Anna Bandlerová, 2019. "Technical Efficiency in the Agricultural Business—The Case of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Spash, Clive L. & Clayton, Anthony M. H., 1995. "Strategies for the maintenance of natural capital," MPRA Paper 38273, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    16. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2022. "Problems, Needs, and Challenges of a Sustainability-Based Production Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Jacqueline Loos & Henrik Von Wehrden, 2018. "Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    18. John Holmberg & Johan Larsson, 2018. "A Sustainability Lighthouse—Supporting Transition Leadership and Conversations on Desirable Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Bastianoni, S. & Facchini, A. & Susani, L. & Tiezzi, E., 2007. "Emergy as a function of exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1158-1162.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:10-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.