IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000149/003829.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

¿Que Tan Segmentado Era El Mercado Laboral Colombiano En La Decada De Los Noventa?

Author

Listed:
  • José Ignacio Uribe García
  • Javier Andrés Castro H.
  • Carlos Humberto Ortíz Quevedo

Abstract

En este documento se analiza la cuestión de la segmentación en el mercado laboral para Colombia en la década de los noventa. Segmentación que se puede observar dentro de una clasificación teniendo en cuenta una aproximación del factor capital humano y capital físico a través de las regresiones mincerianas típicas. Se encuentra que con mayor nivel educativo se tiene mejores condiciones laborales y satisfacción con el puesto de trabajo, de la misma forma que se han identificado barreras no económicas a la movilidad entre segmentos. Igualmente, se observa que los elementos institucionales no presentan el mismo efecto en la segmentación del mercado.

Suggested Citation

  • José Ignacio Uribe García & Javier Andrés Castro H. & Carlos Humberto Ortíz Quevedo, 2004. "¿Que Tan Segmentado Era El Mercado Laboral Colombiano En La Decada De Los Noventa?," Documentos de Trabajo 3829, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000149:003829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cms.univalle.edu.co/socioeconomia/media/ckfinder/files/DOCUMENTO%20DE%20TRABAJO%20CIDSE%20N%C2%B0%2078.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gracia Orlando & Gustavo Hernández & Juan Mauricio Ramirez, 2001. "Diferenciales salariales y mercados laborales en la industria colombiana," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, September.
    2. Cain, Glen G, 1976. "The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 1215-1257, December.
    3. Berger,Suzanne & Piore,Michael J., 1980. "Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521231343.
    4. Dickens, William T & Lang, Kevin, 1985. "A Test of Dual Labor Market Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(4), pages 792-805, September.
    5. William T. Dickens & Kevin Lang, 1985. "Testing Dual Labor Market Theory: A Reconsideration of the Evidence," NBER Working Papers 1670, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Magnac, Th, 1991. "Segmented or Competitive Labor Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 165-187, January.
    7. Pedro S. Amaral & Erwan Quintin, 2003. "The Implications of Capital-Skill Complementarity in Economies with Large Informal Sectors," Macroeconomics 0309017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gustavo Gonzalez Palomino, 2014. "Diferencias en los ingresos laborales en Colombia, 2001‐2006: un análisis de descomposición de Oaxaca para los sectores formal e informal," Revista CIFE, Universidad Santo Tomás, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Humberto Ortiz & José Ignacio Uribe & Érika Raquel Badillo, 2009. "Segmentación inter e intrarregional en el mercado laboral urbano de Colombia, 2001-2006," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, vol. 27(58), pages 194-231, August.
    2. José Ignacio Uribe & Carlos Humberto Ortiz & Gustavo Adolfo García, 2007. "La segmentación del mercado laboral colombiano en la década de los noventa," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 9(16), pages 189-221, January-J.
    3. Rayees Ahmad Sheikh & Sarthak Gaurav & Trupti Mishra, 2021. "Race among equals? An inquiry into the segmentation of Indian labor market," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 2180-2206, November.
    4. Binnur Balkan & Semih Tumen, 2016. "Firm-Size Wage Gaps along the Formal-Informal Divide: Theory and Evidence," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 235-266, April.
    5. Dossè Mawussi DJAHINI-AFAWOUBO, 2023. "Niveau d’éducation et probabilité d’être employé dans le secteur informel au Togo," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 57, pages 29-48.
    6. Daniel Haanwinckel & Rodrigo R Soares, 2021. "Workforce Composition, Productivity, and Labour Regulations in a Compensating Differentials Theory of Informality [Search with Multi-worker Firms]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(6), pages 2970-3010.
    7. Ingrid Kubin & Michael Steiner, 1991. "Labor Market Performance and Regional Types: A Conceptual Framework with Empirical Analysis of Austria," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 14(3), pages 275-298, December.
    8. Basch, Michael & Paredes-Molina, Ricardo D., 1996. "Are there dual labor markets in Chile?: empirical evidence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 297-312, August.
    9. Michele Battisti, 2013. "Reassessing Segmentation In The Labour Market: An Application For Italy 1995–2004," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65, pages 38-55, May.
    10. Erica L. Groshen, 1988. "Why do wages vary among employers?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, vol. 24(Q I), pages 19-38.
    11. Peter Huber & Ulugbek Rahimov, 2017. "The Self-Selection of Workers to the Formal and Informal in Transition Economies: Evidence from Tajikistan," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 140-164, April.
    12. Ulyssea, Gabriel, 2010. "The formal-informal labor market segmentation hypothesis revisited," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 30(2), December.
    13. Assaad, Ragui, 1997. "Kinship ties, social networks, and segmented labor markets: evidence from the construction sector in Egypt," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Semih Tumen, 2015. "Skill Acquisition in the Informal Economy and Schooling Decisions: Evidence from Emerging Economies," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 29(3), pages 270-290, September.
    15. Jones, Garett, 2013. "The O-ring sector and the Foolproof sector: An explanation for skill externalities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Alcaraz Carlo & Chiquiar Daniel & Salcedo Alejandrina, 2015. "Informality and Segmentation in the Mexican Labor Market," Working Papers 2015-25, Banco de México.
    17. Julie Graham & Don M. Shakow, 1990. "Labor Market Segmentation and Job‐Related Risk," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 307-323, July.
    18. Nacer-Eddine Hammouda & Ali Souag, 2012. "Segmentation du marché du travail en Algérie et la détermination du salaire dans les secteurs agricole, moderne non protégé et modernes protégé," Working Papers 699, Economic Research Forum, revised 2012.
    19. Kevin Lang & William T. Dickens, 1987. "Neoclassical and Sociological Perspectives on Segmented Labor Markets," NBER Working Papers 2127, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Pradhan, M.P., 1993. "Sector participation in labour supply models : Preferences or rationing ?," Other publications TiSEM 23a93cbc-c571-492a-a78a-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Segmentación; Mercado Laboral;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000149:003829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CENDOC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cicevco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.