IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt80g5s1km.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation Taxonomy For Congestion Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, H.
  • Hickman, M.
  • Walstad, M.

Abstract

This paper formulated an evaluation taxonomy to identify a broad range of factors that would be important for a comprehensive assessment. The evaluation taxonomy consists of three dimensions: road pricing strategies, impacted groups and impacts. We classified road pricing strategies by seven elements, and defined three types of impacted groups, and eleven impact types. Projects with different objectives will likely emphasize the impact types and impacted groups differently. This evaluation taxonomy is intended to be sufficiently broad so that a wide variety of road pricing schemes can be discussed and compared in one framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, H. & Hickman, M. & Walstad, M., 1996. "An Evaluation Taxonomy For Congestion Pricing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt80g5s1km, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt80g5s1km
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/80g5s1km.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saccomanno, F. F., 1984. "The transferability of logit-based share elasticities for evaluating congestion pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 367-375.
    2. Cascetta, Ennio, 1989. "A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Small, Kenneth A., 1992. "Using the Revenues from Congestion Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt32p9m3mm, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1998. "Principle of marginal-cost pricing: how does it work in a general road network?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-54, January.
    5. Small, Kenneth A., 2001. "Using the Revenues from Congestion Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7170x9b0, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Janson, Bruce N., 1991. "Dynamic traffic assignment for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(2-3), pages 143-161.
    7. David Bernstein & Tony E. Smith, 1994. "Equilibria for Networks with Lower Semicontinuous Costs: With an Application to Congestion Pricing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 221-235, August.
    8. Fielding, Gordon J. & Klein, Daniel B., 1993. "How To Franchise Highways," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt79z9x6fs, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Chang, Gang-Len & Mahmassani, Hani S., 1988. "Travel time prediction and departure time adjustment behavior dynamics in a congested traffic system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 217-232, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Levinson, 2009. "Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 33-57, July.
    2. David Levinson, 2001. "Road Pricing in Practice," Working Papers 199903, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    3. Levinson, David, 1997. "Case Study: Road Pricing In Practice," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0w06s4n2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    2. Ian W. H. Parry & Margaret Walls & Winston Harrington, 2007. "Automobile Externalities and Policies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 373-399, June.
    3. Richard H. M. Emmerink & Paul van Beek, 1997. "Empirical Analysis of Work Schedule Flexibility: Implications for Road Pricing and Driver Information Systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 217-234, February.
    4. Zhong, Shaopeng & Jiang, Yu & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2022. "Lexicographic multi-objective road pricing optimization considering land use and transportation effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 496-509.
    5. C. Robin Lindsey & Erik T. Verhoef, 2000. "Traffic Congestion and Congestion Pricing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-101/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Robert B. Dial, 1999. "Network-Optimized Road Pricing: Part I: A Parable and a Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 54-64, February.
    7. Ho, H.W. & Wong, S.C. & Yang, Hai & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2005. "Cordon-based congestion pricing in a continuum traffic equilibrium system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 813-834.
    8. Chen, Ruoyun & Nozick, Linda, 2016. "Integrating congestion pricing and transit investment planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 124-139.
    9. Julie Bulteau & Thierry Feuillet & Sophie Dantan & Souhir Abbes, 2023. "Encouraging carpooling for commuting in the Paris area (France): which incentives and for whom?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 43-62, February.
    10. Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Barter, Paul A., 2005. "A vehicle quota integrated with road usage pricing: A mechanism to complete the phase-out of high fixed vehicle taxes in Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 525-536, November.
    12. Charles Raux, 1996. "Réduire ou repenser la mobilité urbaine quotidienne ?," Post-Print halshs-01735734, HAL.
    13. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    14. John W Helsel & Venktesh Pandey & Stephen D. Boyles, 2020. "Time-Equitable Dynamic Tolling Scheme For Single Bottlenecks," Papers 2007.07091, arXiv.org.
    15. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-620, August.
    16. De Vos, Jonas, 2016. "Road pricing in a polycentric urban region: Analysing a pilot project in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-142.
    17. Yang Liu & Yu (Marco) Nie, 2017. "A Credit-Based Congestion Management Scheme in General Two-Mode Networks with Multiclass Users," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 681-711, September.
    18. Harrington, Winston & Krupnick, Alan J. & Alberini, Anna, 2001. "Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 87-105, February.
    19. Arnott, Richard, 2013. "A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 110-121.
    20. Jonathan Leape, 2006. "The London Congestion Charge," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 157-176, Fall.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt80g5s1km. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.