IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt550516vw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow: Final Report

Author

Listed:
  • Banks, James H.
  • Amin, Mohammad R.
  • Cassidy, Michael
  • Chung, Koohong

Abstract

A study was conducted to verify C. F. Daganzo's behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow (1, 2). This study was conducted by teams from San Diego State University and the University of California at Berkeley who worked independently on a series of case studies to test predictions derived from the theory. The results of the study suggest that some of the phenomena predicted by Daganzo do occur, but not at all locations, and that the underlying behavioral assumptions are oversimplified. Specifically, the types of flow- density (or flow-occupancy) relationship assumed by Daganzo were found to occur at some sites but not others; semi-congested states and fast waves between semi-congested and fully-congested states, as predicted by Daganzo were observed at one site; an increase in average time gaps indicating a "loss of motivation" assumed by Daganzo was observed at one site but not at others; speeds were found not to be equalized among lanes in congested flow, contrary to Daganzo.s assumption and most past literature; redistribution of flow among lanes was observed at flow breakdown despite the absence of speed equalization, contrary to Daganzo's behavioral assumptions; and distinct capacity and discharge flow states predicted by Daganzo were not observed downstream from queues. Observations not directly related to the test of Daganzo.s theory included details of lane-by-lane speed behavior in congested flow, a case in which the location of the point of maximum density upstream from a bottleneck may have influenced its capacity, and observations of general characteristics of incident recovery flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Banks, James H. & Amin, Mohammad R. & Cassidy, Michael & Chung, Koohong, 2003. "Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt550516vw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt550516vw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/550516vw.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1999. "A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow Part II: Merges and the Onset of Congestion," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3qj018c9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1999. "A Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow Part I: Long Homogeneous Freeway Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8n96n91w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banks, James H., 2003. "Average time gaps in congested freeway flow," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 539-554, July.
    2. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    3. Banks, James, 2002. "Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Mult-Lane Traffic Flow: Interim Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4p57p2tc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Zhang, H. M., 2003. "Anisotropic property revisited--does it hold in multi-lane traffic?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 561-577, July.
    5. Minh Sang Pham Do & Ketoma Vix Kemanji & Man Dinh Vinh Nguyen & Tuan Anh Vu & Gerrit Meixner, 2023. "The Action Point Angle of Sight: A Traffic Generation Method for Driving Simulation, as a Small Step to Safe, Sustainable and Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    7. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    8. Seo, Toru & Kawasaki, Yutaka & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Fundamental diagram estimation by using trajectories of probe vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 40-56.
    9. McCrea, Jennifer & Moutari, Salissou, 2010. "A hybrid macroscopic-based model for traffic flow in road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 676-684, December.
    10. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Wang, Tao & Liao, Peng & Tang, Tie-Qiao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2022. "Deterministic capacity drop and morning commute in traffic corridor with tandem bottlenecks: A new manifestation of capacity expansion paradox," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Herrera, Juan C. & Bayen, Alexandre M., 2010. "Incorporation of Lagrangian measurements in freeway traffic state estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 460-481, May.
    14. Jinxiao Duan & Guanwen Zeng & Nimrod Serok & Daqing Li & Efrat Blumenfeld Lieberthal & Hai-Jun Huang & Shlomo Havlin, 2023. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of traffic bottlenecks yields an early signal of heavy congestions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. David Watling & Giulio Cantarella, 2015. "Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 843-882, September.
    16. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2018. "Dynamic factor model for network traffic state forecast," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 281-317.
    17. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "Continuous kinematic wave models of merging traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1084-1103, September.
    19. Zhang, H.M. & Kim, T., 2005. "A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 385-399, June.
    20. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt550516vw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.