IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdh/ebrief/287.html

Mothers at Work: The Fiscal Implications of the Proposed Ontario Childcare Rebate

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Laurin

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • Jacob Kim

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Laurin & Jacob Kim, 2019. "Mothers at Work: The Fiscal Implications of the Proposed Ontario Childcare Rebate," e-briefs 287, C.D. Howe Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/E-Brief%20287%20Compressed.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eckhoff Andresen, Martin & Havnes, Tarjei, 2019. "Child care, parental labor supply and tax revenue," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Alex Laurin & Kevin Milligan, 2017. "Tax Options for Childcare that Encourage Work, Flexibility, Choice, Fairness and Quality," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 481, May.
    3. Martin Eckhoff Andresen & Tarjei Havnes, 2018. "Child care, parental labor supply and tax revenue," Discussion Papers 881, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    4. Lefebvre, Pierre & Merrigan, Philip & Verstraete, Matthieu, 2009. "Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 490-502, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. BOUSSELIN Audrey, 2019. "Expanding access to universal childcare: Effects on childcare arrangements and maternal employment," LISER Working Paper Series 2019-11, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    2. Daniel Halim & Hillary C. Johnson & Elizaveta Perova, 2022. "Preschool Availability and Women’s Employment: Evidence from Indonesia," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(1), pages 39-61.
    3. Brewer, Mike & Cattan, Sarah & Crawford, Claire & Rabe, Birgitta, 2022. "Does more free childcare help parents work more?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Huebener, Mathias & Pape, Astrid & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2020. "Parental labour supply responses to the abolition of day care fees," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 510-543.
    5. Lele, Uma, 2024. "Determinants of Female Labor Force Participation in India," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344351, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    6. Fiaschi, Davide & Tealdi, Cristina, 2023. "The attachment of adult women to the Italian labour market in the shadow of COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Zhengyu Cai & Heather M. Stephens & John V. Winters, 2019. "Motherhood, migration, and self-employment of college graduates," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 611-629, October.
    8. Mikko Silliman & Juuso Mäkinen, 2026. "Life-cycle effects of public childcare: Evidence on children and their parents," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26004, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    9. Givord, Pauline & Marbot, Claire, 2015. "Does the cost of child care affect female labor market participation? An evaluation of a French reform of childcare subsidies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 99-111.
    10. Sarah Cattan, 2016. "Can universal preschool increase the labor supply of mothers?," World of Labour, LISER, pages 312-312, November.
    11. Brewer, Mike & Cattan, Sarah & Crawford, Claire & Rabe, Birgitta, 2016. "Free Childcare and Parents' Labour Supply: Is More Better?," IZA Discussion Papers 10415, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Edlira Narazani & Ana Agúndez García & Michael Christl & Francesco Figari, 2026. "Increased Childcare to Promote Mothers’ Employment in Selected EU Countries," Contributions to Economics, in: Francesco Figari & Holly Sutherland (ed.), Euromod, pages 335-351, Springer.
    13. Hermes, Henning & Krauß, Marina & Lergetporer, Philipp & Peter, Frauke & Wiederhold, Simon, 2022. "Early child care and labor supply of lower-SES mothers: A randomized controlled trial," DICE Discussion Papers 394, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Fitzenberger, Bernd & Sommerfeld, Katrin & Steffes, Susanne, 2013. "Causal effects on employment after first birth — A dynamic treatment approach," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 49-62.
    15. Brodeur, Abel & Connolly, Marie, 2013. "Do higher child care subsidies improve parental well-being? Evidence from Quebec's family policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-16.
    16. Benoît Laplante, 2024. "Policy and Fertility, a Case Study of the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(3), pages 1-34, June.
    17. Martina Querejeta Rabosto & Estefanía Galván & Cecilia Parada & Soledad Salvador, 2021. "Gender Gaps and Family Policies in Latin America," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4509, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    18. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-00699671 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Matthias Krapf & Anja Roth & Michaela Slotwinski, 2020. "The Effect of Childcare on Parental Earnings Trajectories," CESifo Working Paper Series 8764, CESifo.
    20. Xiao Ma & Alejandro Nakab & Camila Navajas-Ahumada & Daniela Vidart, 2025. "The Motherhood Training Penalty," Working papers 2025-04, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    21. Lefebvre, Pierre & Merrigan, Philip & Verstraete, Matthieu, 2009. "Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 490-502, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Kristine Gray to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.