IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbi/wpaper/15-rt-25.html

Buy Now, Spend More, Pay Later: Behavioural Mechanisms of Buy Now Pay Later Products

Author

Listed:
  • Jose, Anu

    (Central Bank of Ireland)

  • Kelly, Jane

    (Central Bank of Ireland)

  • King, Michael

    (Trinity College Dublin)

  • McCarthy, Yvonne

    (Trinity College Dublin)

Abstract

We study the behavioural effects of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL), a rapidly expanding form of consumer credit. Through an experiment conducted with a nationally representative sample in Ireland, we find that participants spend, on average, 4.39% more when using BNPL for purchases compared to debit cards. We demonstrate mental accounting effects where an inflated perception of available funds due to prior BNPL usage leads to a 22.2% higher likelihood of spending on a discretionary product. In parallel, we show the importance of anticipatory effects of such a credit innovation, whereby the mere expectation of future access to BNPL increases current debit card spending by 3.1%. While salient risk disclosures improve understanding of BNPL risks, they do not significantly affect usage or spending patterns. These findings highlight the dual psychological impact of BNPL on spending, support the rationale for consumer protection efforts, and establish the relevance of BNPL as a financial product of interest to macroeconomic policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose, Anu & Kelly, Jane & King, Michael & McCarthy, Yvonne, 2025. "Buy Now, Spend More, Pay Later: Behavioural Mechanisms of Buy Now Pay Later Products," Research Technical Papers 15/RT/25, Central Bank of Ireland.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbi:wpaper:15/rt/25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/publications/research-technical-papers/rtp-15-2025-behavioural-mechanisms-of-bnpl.pdf?sfvrsn=9b816e1a_8
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lunn, Peter D. & Ní Choisdealbha, Áine, 2018. "The case for laboratory experiments in behavioural public policy," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 22-40, May.
    2. Jens Ludwig & Jeffrey R. Kling & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2011. "Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(3), pages 17-38, Summer.
    3. Armin Falk & James J. Heckman, 2009. "Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," Working Papers 200935, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    4. David B. Gross & Nicholas S. Souleles, 2002. "Do Liquidity Constraints and Interest Rates Matter for Consumer Behavior? Evidence from Credit Card Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 149-185.
    5. Loretta Garrison & Manoj Hastak & Jeanne M. Hogarth & Susan Kleimann & Alan S. Levy, 2012. "Designing Evidence-based Disclosures: A Case Study of Financial Privacy Notices," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 204-234, June.
    6. Hilchey, Matthew D. & Osborne, Matthew & Soman, Dilip, 2023. "Does the visual salience of credit card features affect choice?," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 291-308, April.
    7. Stephan Meier & Charles Sprenger, 2010. "Present-Biased Preferences and Credit Card Borrowing," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 193-210, January.
    8. Gaffney, Edward & Lyons, Paul, 2024. "An overview of the consumer credit market in Ireland," Financial Stability Notes 1/FS/24, Central Bank of Ireland.
    9. Feinberg, Richard A, 1986. "Credit Cards as Spending Facilitating Stimuli: A Conditioning Interpretation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 348-356, December.
    10. Marco Di Maggio & Emily Williams & Justin Katz, 2022. "Buy Now, Pay Later Credit: User Characteristics and Effects on Spending Patterns," NBER Working Papers 30508, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Drazen Prelec & George Loewenstein, 1998. "The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zinman, Jonathan, 2009. "Debit or credit?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 358-366, February.
    2. Carolyn St Aubyn, 2022. "Consumer choices with wealth preferences and separation of consumption and payment," BCAM Working Papers 2201, Birkbeck Centre for Applied Macroeconomics.
    3. Amit Poddar & Cameron Ellis & Timucin Ozcan, 2015. "Imperfect Recall: The Impact of Composite Spending Information Disclosure on Credit Card Spending," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 93-104, March.
    4. Yizhao Jiang, 2022. "The Influence of Payment Method: Do Consumers Pay More with Mobile Payment?," Papers 2210.14631, arXiv.org.
    5. Lukas, Moritz & Nöth, Markus, 2022. "Voluntary minimum repayments and borrower heterogeneity: Evidence from revolving consumer credit," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Meta Brown & Andrew F. Haughwout & Donghoon Lee & Wilbert Van der Klaauw, 2011. "Do we know what we owe? A comparison of borrower- and lender-reported consumer debt," Staff Reports 523, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    7. Ma, Qingguo & He, Yijin & Tan, Yulin & Cheng, Lu & Wang, Manlin, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Payment Methods on Consumer Behavior: Insights and Future Directions," OSF Preprints 3fphk, Center for Open Science.
    8. Olafsson, Arna & Gathergood, John, 2020. "The Co-holding Puzzle: New Evidence from Transaction-Level Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 14799, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:3fphk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zeballos, Eliana & Mancino, Lisa & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2020. "Does how you pay influence the share of healthy items that you Buy? Assessing differences in nutritional quality of food purchases by payment type," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Charles Sprenger & Joanna Stavins, 2008. "Credit card debt and payment use," Working Papers 08-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    12. Andrej Gill & Florian Hett & Johannes Tischer, 2022. "Time Inconsistency and Overdraft Use: Evidence from Transaction Data and Behavioral Measurement Experiments," Working Papers 2205, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    13. Francisco Gomes & Michael Haliassos & Tarun Ramadorai, 2021. "Household Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 919-1000, September.
    14. Çokgezen, Murat & Kuran, Timur, 2015. "Between consumer demand and Islamic law: The evolution of Islamic credit cards in Turkey," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 862-882.
    15. Stephan Meier & Charles Sprenger, 2007. "Impatience and credit behavior: evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 07-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    16. Stephen Brown & Chris Veld & Yulia Veld‐Merkoulova, 2020. "Credit Cards: Transactional Convenience or Debt‐Trap?," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 20(2), pages 295-322, June.
    17. Dilip Soman & Amar Cheema, 2002. "The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 32-53, September.
    18. Sera Linardi & Tomomi Tanaka, 2012. "Competition as a Savings Incentive: a Field Experiment at a Homeless Shelter," Working Paper 484, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
    19. Luqiong Tong & Yuhuang Zheng & Ping Zhao, 2013. "Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 119-129, June.
    20. Lata Gangadharan & Tarun Jain & Pushkar Maitra & Joe Vecci, 2022. "Lab-in-the-field experiments: perspectives from research on gender," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-59, January.
    21. Werthschulte, Madeline & Löschel, Andreas, 2021. "On the role of present bias and biased price beliefs in household energy consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance
    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbi:wpaper:15/rt/25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fiona Farrelly (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbigvie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.