IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2679.html

What Do European CBAMs Leave Unpriced? Value-Chain Coverage Gaps in Global and Chinese Imports

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, H.
  • Pollitt, M. G.

Abstract

European carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) leave most of the quantified emissions embodied in imports outside their present boundaries. Applying EU and UK statutory schedules to fixed 2025 trade, we estimate coverage of 31.0% and 26.9% of the respective Global product accounts, with still lower shares for imports from China. Adding electricity within goods already listed closes only a minority of the gap. The larger additions come from wider product coverage. In an illustrative passenger car, cove red materials and production electricity account for 49.8% of quantified production emissions, although the finished vehicle falls outside the current schedules. Across trade, vehicles, machinery and photovoltaic products are major downstream carriers, while chemicals, petroleum products and textiles dominate the residual. These findings identify two distinct policy tasks. Effective origin carbon prices can pass through domestic materials and electricity into downstream exports, creating a basis for selective climate-club recognition. Residual industries outside carbon pricing require broader emissions trading system coverage. We suggest that EU and UK authorities should signal a longer-term direction for possible CBAM expansion across products and sectors, alongside principles for recognizing carbon costs paid in origin countries. This would not commit either authority to immediate expansion. But it could encourage stronger and broader carbon pricing in origin countries while the technical requirements for any future expansion are still being developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, H. & Pollitt, M. G., 2026. "What Do European CBAMs Leave Unpriced? Value-Chain Coverage Gaps in Global and Chinese Imports," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2679, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication-cwpe-pdfs/cwpe2679.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantin Stadler & Richard Wood & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Carl†Johan Södersten & Moana Simas & Sarah Schmidt & Arkaitz Usubiaga & José Acosta†Fernández & Jeroen Kuenen & Martin Bruckner & Stefan, 2018. "EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi†Regional Input†Output Tables," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 502-515, June.
    2. Lijun Ren & Jingru Wang & Luoyi Zhang & Xiaoxiao Hu & Yan Ning & Jianhui Cong & Yongling Li & Weiqiang Zhang & Tian Xu & Xiaoning Shi, 2025. "Quantitative Assessment of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Impacts on China–EU Trade and Provincial-Level Vulnerabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Christoph Böhringer & Carolyn Fischer & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Thomas Fox Rutherford, 2022. "Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 22-29, January.
    4. Branger, Frédéric & Quirion, Philippe, 2014. "Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-39.
    5. Michael A Mehling & Robert A Ritz, 2023. "From theory to practice: determining emissions in traded goods under a border carbon adjustment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 123-133.
    6. Fischer, Carolyn & Fox, Alan K., 2012. "Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 199-216.
    7. Aaron Cosbey & Susanne Droege & Carolyn Fischer & Clayton Munnings, 2019. "Developing Guidance for Implementing Border Carbon Adjustments: Lessons, Cautions, and Research Needs from the Literature," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 3-22.
    8. Guilherme Magacho & Etienne Espagne & Antoine Godin, 2024. "Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-259, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amendola, Marco, 2025. "Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Ambec, Stefan & Esposito, Federico & Pacelli, Antonia, 2024. "The economics of carbon leakage mitigation policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Chen, Zhe-Yi & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cheng, Lei & Qiu, Rui-Xiang, 2025. "How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Mariana Conte Grand & Paulina Schulz-Antipa & Julie Rozenberg, 2024. "Potential exposure and vulnerability to broader climate-related trade regulations: an illustration for LAC countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6195-6220, March.
    5. Hannah Minten & Julian Hausweiler & Benedict Probst & Christiane Reinert & Raoul Meys & André Bardow, 2025. "Embodied emissions of chemicals within the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 1381-1390, November.
    6. Stede, Jan & Pauliuk, Stefan & Hardadi, Gilang & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2021. "Carbon pricing of basic materials: Incentives and risks for the value chain and consumers," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 189.
    7. Perdana, Sigit & Vielle, Marc, 2022. "Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Jebeli, Hossein & Chen, Y.-H. Henry & Johnston, Craig & Paltsev, Sergey & Tremblay, Marie-Christine, 2025. "Impacts of border carbon adjustments on the Canadian economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Dy, Kenneth Bicol & Yang, Han, 2025. "Global emissions and international trade: Quantifying the impact of carbon border adjustments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Xianting Bao & Yuran Jin, 2025. "Insight into border carbon adjustment: a visual bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2024," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Yu, Wusheng & Clora, Francesco & Costa, Louis & Baudry, Gino, 2021. "Dietary Transitions As Climate Mitigation Measures in Europe: Implications of Supply-Side Responses and Trade Policy Regimes," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315912, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Campolmi, Alessia & Fadinger, Harald & Forlati, Chiara & Stillger, Sabine & Wagner, Ulrich, 2023. "Designing Effective Carbon Border Adjustment with Minimal Information Requirements. Theory and Empirics," CEPR Discussion Papers 18645, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Grugni, Elisa & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen, 2026. "Carbon leakage in production networks under asymmetric climate policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Mortha, Aline & Arimura, Toshi H. & Takeda, Shiro & Steubing, Bernhard R.P. & Chesnokova, Tatyana, 2025. "Industrial relocation or shorter shipping routes? Examining the impact of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on global emissions using structural gravity," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1708-1741.
    15. Linfang Yan & Kaibin Weng & Heng Zhou & Di Zhu & Xingyang Zhu & Yong Zhou & Simeng Gao & Zhili Du, 2025. "The Long-Term Impact of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China’s Power Supply and Demand and Environmental Benefits: An Analysis Based on the Computable General Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Aliénor Cameron & Marc Baudry, 2023. "The case for carbon leakage and border adjustments: where do economists stand?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(3), pages 435-469, July.
    17. Runfan Chen & Liyong Wang & Chun Xiong, 2026. "How Does CBAM Drive Green Technological Innovation Toward Sustainable Development? Cost, Awareness, and Information Channels in an E-DSGE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-38, July.
    18. Antoci, Angelo & Borghesi, Simone & Iannucci, Gianluca & Sodini, Mauro, 2021. "Should I stay or should I go? Carbon leakage and ETS in an evolutionary model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Yanan Ren & Mei Wang & Qunwei Wang, 2025. "Cross‐border risks of industrial decarbonization: Carbon tariffs exacerbate carbon inequity in international trade," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 2082-2097, December.
    20. repec:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2024_495v2 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Clora, Francesco & Yu, Wusheng & Corong, Erwin, 2023. "Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: Aggregate and within-coalition results," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.