Author
Listed:
- Yanan Ren
- Mei Wang
- Qunwei Wang
Abstract
Policies targeting cross‐border industrial decarbonization, such as carbon tariffs, may risk exacerbating the structural inequity between countries/regions regarding climate responsibility and economic benefits. As a typical representative, the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is introduced to combat carbon leakage and promote global industrial decarbonization. However, the implications of CBAM on trade‐related carbon inequity remain underexplored. Using international trade data of the primary CBAM‐targeted sectors (cement, fertilizers, iron and steel, and aluminum), we apply the Carbon Gini coefficient and the Trade Carbon Inequity (TCI) index to assess the effects of carbon tariffs with various revenue recycling mechanisms on trade‐related carbon inequities at both global and national/regional levels. The results reveal that implementing CBAM, without revenue recycling, significantly intensifies carbon inequity, as indicated by increased Carbon Gini coefficients and higher percentage increases in developing economies’ TCI indices. Moreover, revenue recycling—whether based on national/regional historical climate damage or per‐capita income—partially mitigates these effects, yet carbon inequities remain above the pre‐CBAM baselines. In contrast, our proposed TCI‐based allocation criterion reduces the Carbon Gini coefficients below pre‐CBAM levels and offsets CBAM‐related TCI increases in developing economies such as Turkey and India. These findings emphasize that CBAM design needs to integrate justice‐oriented revenue recycling to harmonize decarbonization efforts with equity goals in pursuing a globally carbon‐neutral economy while reconciling Sustainable Development Goals—specifically, “SDG13‐Climate Action” and “SDG10‐Reduced Inequalities.”
Suggested Citation
Yanan Ren & Mei Wang & Qunwei Wang, 2025.
"Cross‐border risks of industrial decarbonization: Carbon tariffs exacerbate carbon inequity in international trade,"
Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 2082-2097, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2082-2097
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70094
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2082-2097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.