IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2601.html

Opaque Selling with Endogenous Product Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Hoover, D.

Abstract

This paper explores the profitability and impact of opaque selling in a monopolist market with endogenous product characteristics. Opaque selling is a strategy where a firm sells goods through a lottery mechanism that randomly rewards consumers with a product that is revealed after purchase. Using a standard two-good Hotelling model with endogenous product locations, I compare market equilibria for a monopolist under traditional selling and opaque selling. I find that opaque selling always earns the firm a higher profit when product locations are endogenous. Additionally, it generally induces the firm to select more extreme product varieties. Using an extension to the Salop circular city model, I also show that opaque selling results in the firm introducing fewer product varieties. In terms of welfare, opaque selling unambiguously increases producer surplus and reduces consumer surplus. Although consumption of the lottery good is welfare inefficient, opaque selling can potentially increase welfare by inducing the firm to serve more consumers than it would under traditional selling. These results suggest that opaque selling may be a more viable long-term strategy when firms are capable of adjusting their product mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoover, D., 2026. "Opaque Selling with Endogenous Product Characteristics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2601, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication-cwpe-pdfs/cwpe2601.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fay, Scott & Xie, Jinhong & Feng, Cong, 2015. "The Effect of Probabilistic Selling on the Optimal Product Mix," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 451-467.
    2. Tingliang Huang & Yimin Yu, 2014. "Sell Probabilistic Goods? A Behavioral Explanation for Opaque Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 743-759, September.
    3. Irmen, Andreas & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1998. "Competition in Multi-characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 76-102, January.
    4. Scott Fay & Jinhong Xie, 2010. "The Economics of Buyer Uncertainty: Advance Selling vs. Probabilistic Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1040-1057, 11-12.
    5. Filippo Balestrieri & Sergei Izmalkov & Joao Leao, 2021. "The Market for Surprises: Selling Substitute Goods Through Lotteries," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 509-535.
    6. Kinshuk Jerath & Serguei Netessine & Senthil K. Veeraraghavan, 2010. "Revenue Management with Strategic Customers: Last-Minute Selling and Opaque Selling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 430-448, March.
    7. Scott Fay & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Probabilistic Goods: A Creative Way of Selling Products and Services," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 674-690, 07-08.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guang Yang & Ying Wang & Mulin Liu, 2023. "Optimal Policy for Probabilistic Selling with Three-Way Revenue Sharing Contract under the Perspective of Sustainable Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Feng, Bo & Mao, Zhaofang & Li, Hui, 2021. "Choices for competing service providers with heterogeneous customers: Traditional versus opaque sales modes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Alonso, Juana M. & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2025. "Blind tickets to solve the inefficiencies of subsidies for residents in air transport markets," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 140-156.
    4. Yang, Guang & Tian, Lin & Cai, Mei & Cao, Jie & Gong, Zaiwu, 2025. "Vertically probabilistic selling mechanism under asymmetric quality-tier competition: An analytical exploration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    5. Yifan Wu & Shibo Jin, 2022. "Joint pricing and inventory decision under a probabilistic selling strategy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1209-1233, April.
    6. Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2019. "Probabilistic Selling for Vertically Differentiated Products with Salient Thinkers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 442-460, May.
    7. Alonso, Juana M. & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2024. "Blind booking: The effects on passengers' purchase decision, airlines’ profitability, and tourist destinations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Schäfers, Sebastian, 2022. "Product Lotteries and Loss Aversion," Working papers 2022/06, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    9. Qing Li & Christopher S. Tang & He Xu, 2020. "Mitigating the Double‐Blind Effect in Opaque Selling: Inventory and Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 35-54, January.
    10. Guo, Xiaolong & Bian, Junsong & Wu, Peiyan & Shi, Victor & Chen, Huangen, 2023. "Probabilistic product design with regret-anticipated consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Yeu-Shiang Huang & Tzu-Yi Wu & Chih-Chiang Fang & Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng, 2021. "Decisions on Probabilistic Selling for Consumers with Different Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 121-138, June.
    12. Zhang, Zihao & Zhang, Mengying, 2024. "Pricing and Capacity Allocation in Opaque Selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 230-241.
    13. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2020. "Risk pooling through physical probabilistic selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 295-311.
    14. Zhaofang Mao & Ting Liu & Xiaomei Li, 2023. "Pricing mechanism of variable opaque products for dual-channel online travel agencies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 901-930, October.
    15. Aleksandra Kovacheva & Hristina Nikolova, 2024. "Uncertainty marketing tactics: An overview and a unifying framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Fu, Qi & Wang, Qifei & Xu, Xiaoya & Lian, Zhaotong, 2017. "A two-product newsvendor system with a flexible product," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 590-601.
    17. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Wang, Shouyang & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2018. "Managing demand uncertainty: Probabilistic selling versus inventory substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 56-67.
    18. Pak Hou Che & Yue Chen, 2025. "Probabilistic Selling with Unsealing Strategy: An Analysis in Markets with Vertical-Differentiated Products," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    19. Ben Li & Xiaolong Guo & Liang Liang, 2024. "Optimal pricing decision and capacity allocation of opaque selling in airline revenue management," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 356-368, August.
    20. Jin Miao & Sanjay Jain, 2024. "Designing Loot Boxes: Implications for Profits and Welfare," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 1242-1259, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D42 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Monopoly
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.