IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recommendation Power and Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Peitz

  • Anton Sobolev

Abstract

A firm may decide to make total-surplus-reducing purchase recommendations in response to consumer heterogeneity in an experience good setting. First, we show under which conditions the firm chooses to make such biased recommendations in a monopoly setting. Second, we propose a duopoly model with differentiated products in which single-product firms compete in uniform prices and recommendation policies. We provide conditions under which both firms choose to bias their recommendations, whereas the bias would be absent if products were more differentiated or one of the two products were withdrawn from the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Peitz & Anton Sobolev, 2025. "Recommendation Power and Competition," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_715, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp715
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre de Cornière & Greg Taylor, 2019. "A model of biased intermediation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(4), pages 854-882, December.
    2. Guy Aridor & Duarte Goncalves & Daniel Kluver & Ruoyan Kong & Joseph Konstan, 2022. "The Informational Role of Online Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Papers 2211.14219, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2024. "Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2553-2595, August.
    2. Jack (Peiyao) Ma & Andrea Mantovani & Carlo Reggiani & Annette Broocks & Néstor Duch-Brown, 2024. "The Price Effects of Prohibiting Price Parity Clauses: Evidence from International Hotel Groups," Economics Series Working Papers 1043, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Martin Peitz & Anton Sobolev, 2024. "Product Recommendations and Price Parity Clauses," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_595, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    5. Rhodes, Andrew & Zhou, Jidong, 2024. "Personalization and Privacy Choice," CEPR Discussion Papers 19000, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. de Cornière, Alexandre & Taylor, Greg, 2022. "Data and Competition: a Simple Framework with Applications to Mergers and Market Structure," CEPR Discussion Papers 14446, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Guy Aridor & Duarte Goncalves & Daniel Kluver & Ruoyan Kong & Joseph Konstan, 2022. "The Informational Role of Online Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Papers 2211.14219, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    8. Yassine Lefouili & Leonardo Madio, 2022. "The economics of platform liability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 319-351, June.
    9. Justin P. Johnson & Andrew Rhodes & Matthijs Wildenbeest, 2023. "Platform Design When Sellers Use Pricing Algorithms," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(5), pages 1841-1879, September.
    10. Shen, Bo & Wright, Julian, 2019. "Why (don’t) firms free ride on an intermediary’s advice?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 27-54.
    11. Paul Heidhues & Mats Köster & Botond Kőszegi, 2023. "Steering Fallible Consumers," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(652), pages 1430-1465.
    12. Federico Etro, 2021. "Product selection in online marketplaces," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 614-637, August.
    13. Muxin Li & Ksenia Shakhgildyan, 2025. "``Frenemy'' of Two Giants: Amazon and Apple," Working Papers 25-06, NET Institute.
    14. Gilbert, Richard J., 2021. "Separation: A Cure for Abuse of Platform Dominance?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Martin Peitz, 2025. "Governance and Regulation of Platforms," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 23, pages 565-593, Springer.
    16. Huang, Yangguang & Xie, Yu, 2023. "Search algorithm, repetitive information, and sales on online platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Hui Song, 2021. "Prominence of store-brand products in an electronic platform," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 47-83, June.
    18. Guy Aridor & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Ro'ee Levy & Lena Song, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 1422-1474, December.
    19. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 75, pages 1-1.
    20. Budzinski, Oliver & Feddersen, Arne, 2022. "Should organizing premier-level European football be a monopoly? And who should run it? - An economists' perspective," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 166, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D42 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Monopoly
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.