IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/1081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Still Growing Together? The Spatial Distribution and Industrial Composition of U.S. County GDP since 1870

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Fulford

    (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)

  • Fabio Schiantarelli

    (Boston College
    IZA)

Abstract

We construct the first estimates of U.S. county nominal and real GDP by broadly defined industrial sectors from 1870 to 2018. Counties tended to converge from 1870 until 1970, but subsequently grew apart. Falling inequality between states explains most of the fall in county inequality from 1870 to 1970. After 1970, increasing inequality within states explains most of the overall inequality increase. Before 1970, more productive states were more equal, after 1970 more productive states were more unequal. U.S. geographic inequality is no longer primarily about differences between regions or states, but instead about differences within them. We show how the changing industrial composition affects inequality. The path to riches has changed from manufacturing to tradable services. From 1870 to 1950, manufacturing became increasingly concentrated in the richest counties. The manufacturing share is now the highest in middle income counties, while the richest counties increasingly produce tradable services. Manufacturing’s contribution to inequality is the largest before 1960 and its decline is the main explanation for the fall in inequality from 1930 to 1970, while the growth of tradable services and their concentration in top metropolitan areas contribute to the nominal inequality increase after 1970. Agriculture used to be the primary activity of the poorest counties. Now, the poorer the county, the larger the share in government, education, and health. Government services decrease county inequality. We show that population growth and education used to be strongly pro-convergence, but after 1970 became neutral or anti-convergence. At the same time, agglomeration effects in manufacturing and tradable services appear to have increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Fulford & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2024. "Still Growing Together? The Spatial Distribution and Industrial Composition of U.S. County GDP since 1870," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1081, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 15 Mar 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp1081.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurice Leven, 1925. "Introduction to "Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921"," NBER Chapters, in: Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921, pages 41-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. John W. Kendrick, 1961. "Productivity Trends in the United States," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number kend61-1, March.
    3. Harold Barger, 1955. "Foreword to "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869"," NBER Chapters, in: Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869, pages -9--7, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Robert E. Gallman, 1960. "Commodity Output, 1839-1899," NBER Chapters, in: Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, pages 13-72, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Harold Barger, 1955. "Appendices and Index to "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869"," NBER Chapters, in: Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869, pages 101-220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Harold Barger, 1955. "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number barg55-1, March.
    7. Maurice Leven, 1925. "Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number leve25-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basker, Emek & Vickers, Chris & Ziebarth, Nicolas L., 2018. "Competition, productivity, and survival of grocery stores in the Great Depression," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 282-315.
    2. Fred Moseley, 1989. "The Decline of the Rate of Profit in the Postwar U.S. Economy," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 48-66, March.
    3. Gabriel H. De La Paz, 2014. "Modifying reality: marketing for the 22-super-nd century," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 246-261, June.
    4. Bucheli, Marcelo & Mahoney, Joseph T. & Vaaler, Paul M., 2007. "Chandler's Living History: The Visible Hand of Vertical Integration in 19th Century America Viewed under a 21st Century Transaction Costs Economics Lens," Working Papers 07-0111, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    5. Janet Knoedler, 1996. "Coordination of Distribution in a Monetary Theory of Production," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 579-590, June.
    6. Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2015. "The provision of convenience and variety by the market," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(3), pages 480-498, September.
    7. Manchester, Alden, 1987. "Developing an Integrated Information System for the Food Sector," Agricultural Economic Reports 308031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Harp, Harry H., 1987. "Major Statistical Series of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Volume 4: Agricultural Marketing Costs and Charges," Miscellaneous Publications 316564, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Khaled, Mohammed S, 2017. "Estimating bias of technical progress with a small dataset," Working Paper Series 6219, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Rajeev Dehejia & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2007. "Financial Development and Pathways of Growth: State Branching and Deposit Insurance Laws in the United States, 1900–1940," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(2), pages 239-272.
    11. Romer, Christina D, 1989. "The Prewar Business Cycle Reconsidered: New Estimates of Gross National Product, 1869-1908," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(1), pages 1-37, February.
    12. L. Rachel Ngai & Claudia Olivetti & Barbara Petrongolo, 2024. "Gendered change: 150 years of transformation in US hours," Economics Series Working Papers 1046, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    13. Robert E. Gallman, 1986. "The United States Capital Stock in the Nineteenth Century," NBER Chapters, in: Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, pages 165-214, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Isaac Johsua, 1996. "Les activités pro ou contra-cycliques et la grande crise américaine des années trente," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 11(4), pages 83-117.
    15. Stephen N. Broadberry & Douglas A. Irwin, 2004. "Labor Productivity in Britain and America During the Nineteenth Century," NBER Working Papers 10364, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Benjamin N. Dennis & Talan B. Işcan, 2007. "Accounting for Structural Change: Evidence from Two Centuries of U.S. Data," Working Papers daleconwp2007-04, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
    17. Till F. Hollstein & Kristian Estévez, 2017. "Industrial Policy and the Timing of Trade Liberalization," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2017/361, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    18. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2010. "Improving Human Development: A Long‐Run View," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 841-894, December.
    19. N. V. Suvorov & E. A. Rutkovskaya & E. E. Balashova & S. I. Maksimtsova & S. V. Treschina & Yu.V. Beletskii, 2022. "Assessing the Performance of Fixed Assets in the Russian Economy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 367-376, August.
    20. Vazquez, Emilia & Rodriguez, X.A., 1997. "Un analisis de la productividad del comercio en las Comunidades Autonomas españolas," Economic Development 21, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business. Econometrics..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional Growth; Inequality; Productivity; Industrial Composition; County growth; United States; GDP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • N9 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debocus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.