IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/1081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Still Growing Together? The Spatial Distribution and Industrial Composition of U.S. County GDP since 1870

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Fulford

    (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)

  • Fabio Schiantarelli

    (Boston College
    IZA)

Abstract

We construct the first estimates of U.S. county GDP by broadly defined industrial sectors from 1870 to 2018. U.S. GDP per worker inequality has two broad eras: from 1870 to 1970 U.S. counties grew together, as states converged and inequality within states fell. Manufac- turing became less concentrated and more equally productive, explaining much of inequality’s decline. But U.S. counties stopped growing together after 1970. GDP inequality within states increased as the most productive metro areas increasingly decoupled from the rest of the state. GDP per person inequality increased even more than GDP per worker, driven by increasing employment-to-population inequality. Replacing manufacturing as the path to riches, tradable services, such as finance and business services, became increasingly concentrated in rich ar- eas, while poor areas’ economies became dominated by government, education, and health services. Troublingly for growth, the most productive counties’ populations no longer grow more rapidly than in other counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Fulford & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2024. "Still Growing Together? The Spatial Distribution and Industrial Composition of U.S. County GDP since 1870," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1081, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 15 Nov 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp1081.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurice Leven, 1925. "Introduction to "Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921"," NBER Chapters, in: Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921, pages 41-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Harold Barger, 1955. "Foreword to "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869"," NBER Chapters, in: Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869, pages -9--7, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Harold Barger, 1955. "Appendices and Index to "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869"," NBER Chapters, in: Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869, pages 101-220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Harold Barger, 1955. "Distribution's Place in the American Economy since 1869," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number barg55-1, March.
    5. John W. Kendrick, 1961. "Productivity Trends in the United States," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number kend61-1, March.
    6. Robert E. Gallman, 1960. "Commodity Output, 1839-1899," NBER Chapters, in: Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, pages 13-72, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Maurice Leven, 1925. "Income in the Various States: Its Sources and Distribution, 1919, 1920, and 1921," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number leve25-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel H. De La Paz, 2014. "Modifying reality: marketing for the 22-super-nd century," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 246-261, June.
    2. Bucheli, Marcelo & Mahoney, Joseph T. & Vaaler, Paul M., 2007. "Chandler's Living History: The Visible Hand of Vertical Integration in 19th Century America Viewed under a 21st Century Transaction Costs Economics Lens," Working Papers 07-0111, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    3. Basker, Emek & Vickers, Chris & Ziebarth, Nicolas L., 2018. "Competition, productivity, and survival of grocery stores in the Great Depression," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 282-315.
    4. Fred Moseley, 1989. "The Decline of the Rate of Profit in the Postwar U.S. Economy," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 48-66, March.
    5. Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2015. "The provision of convenience and variety by the market," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(3), pages 480-498, September.
    6. Manchester, Alden, 1987. "Developing an Integrated Information System for the Food Sector," Agricultural Economic Reports 308031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Janet Knoedler, 1996. "Coordination of Distribution in a Monetary Theory of Production," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 579-590, June.
    8. Harp, Harry H., 1987. "Major Statistical Series of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Volume 4: Agricultural Marketing Costs and Charges," Miscellaneous Publications 316564, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. L. Rachel Ngai & Claudia Olivetti & Barbara Petrongolo, 2024. "Gendered change: 150 years of transformation in US hours," Economics Series Working Papers 1046, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Robert E. Gallman, 1986. "The United States Capital Stock in the Nineteenth Century," NBER Chapters, in: Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, pages 165-214, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Stephen N. Broadberry & Douglas A. Irwin, 2004. "Labor Productivity in Britain and America During the Nineteenth Century," NBER Working Papers 10364, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Romer, Christina D, 1989. "The Prewar Business Cycle Reconsidered: New Estimates of Gross National Product, 1869-1908," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(1), pages 1-37, February.
    13. Khaled, Mohammed S, 2017. "Estimating bias of technical progress with a small dataset," Working Paper Series 6219, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    14. Rajeev Dehejia & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2007. "Financial Development and Pathways of Growth: State Branching and Deposit Insurance Laws in the United States, 1900–1940," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(2), pages 239-272.
    15. Isaac Johsua, 1996. "Les activités pro ou contra-cycliques et la grande crise américaine des années trente," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 11(4), pages 83-117.
    16. Benjamin N. Dennis & Talan B. Işcan, 2007. "Accounting for Structural Change: Evidence from Two Centuries of U.S. Data," Working Papers daleconwp2007-04, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
    17. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    18. Charles R. Hulten, 1992. "Growth Accounting When Technical Change is Embodied in Capital," NBER Working Papers 3971, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Prados de la Escosura, Leandro & Rosés, Joan R., 2008. "Proximate causes of economic growth in Spain, 1850-2000," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH wp08-12, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
    20. Jeremy Atack & Robert A. Margo, 2019. "Gallman revisited: blacksmithing and American manufacturing, 1850–1870," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • N9 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debocus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.