Research as Usual: How Researching Public Problems Affects Problem Solving
While Western welfare systems work fine for the majority of people, they have become part of the problem for those who need it the most: people suffering from multiple deprivation. The partnerships Western governments have set up to join up the fragmented welfare system often break down. While research has identified many barriers and solutions, this knowledge does not necessarily help public officials and citizens implicated in the everyday practice of making quick decisions about complicated, ethically challenging, and constantly changing situations while interacting with each other. Besides the rare case of action research in policy analysis, researchers are usually placed outside of these interactive processes. This paper develops an actionable approach to examining how everyday practices of researching public problems emerge from the push and pull between two co-existing and incompatible systems of “research as usual”: one in which researchers and local governance actors collaborate as everyday practice, and one in which their worlds are separated by institutional pressures, languages, and practices. Ethnographic and action research methods will be used to work with public officials and citizens to facilitate processes of joint inquiry or “researching”: activities aimed at understanding the world and interpreting the effects of efforts to change it. Researching problems of multiple deprivation together could generate new solutions and collaborative relationships for harnessing multiple deprivation.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Gwynedd LL57 2DG|
Phone: +44 (0) 1248 383648
Web page: http://www.bangor.ac.uk/business/research/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Editors, 2003. "Editor's Introduction," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 315-318, April.
- Editors, 2003. "Editor's Introduction," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 645-648, October.
- Barbara C Crosby & John M Bryson, 2005. "A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 177-201, June.
- Hal Colebatch, 2006. "What work makes policy?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(4), pages 309-321, December.
- Hessels, Laurens K. & van Lente, Harro, 2008. "Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 740-760, May.
- John F. Forester, 1999. "The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262561220, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bng:wpaper:13002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Huw Hughes)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.