IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Welfare Estimation In A General Equilibrium Model With Cites

Listed author(s):
  • Oded Hochman


Registered author(s):

    We show that current measures of welfare changes which are all based on the compensated variation (CV) and the equivalent variation (EV) do not apply to an economy with cities. In addition, since these measures are utilized in a partial equilibrium analysis they capture only part of the effect of a welfare change. We then define measures appropriate for an urban economy in a general equilibrium framework. We first construct for each city a cost function from which we derive a city’s and, after aggregation, the economy’s, demand functions. These demands are functions of nationwide prices and of either the unearned incomes (Marshalian demand curves) or of the utility levels (compensated demand curves). From the same cost functions we also derive the Marshalian and compensated supply curves. Each point on a Marshalian demand curve is an allocation designated by the price vector and the unearned income vector. An allocation is either in perfect equilibrium, when the marginal cost in each market is equal to the market price or, if the marginal cost differs from the market price in some markets, the allocation is in imperfect equilibrium and is inefficient. Imperfect markets can be improved by moving to other allocations on the same Marshalian demand function. We construct modified versions, such as mCV and mEV, of the welfare measures CV and EV, from which we define the modified economic surplus (mES) as the ultimate welfare measure. The mES is equal to the willingness to pay for the added product produced (i.e., the area between the Marshalian demand curve and the quantity-axis), minus the added costs of production in current prices and wages, and plus the change in the differential land rents (DLR) in the cities producing the good. The analysis is then extended to cases in which more than one market price changes. We also estimate secondary effects in imperfect markets in which the market price remains constant while the price in the primary market changes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 1213.

    in new window

    Length: 57 pages
    Date of creation: 2012
    Handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:1213
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    P.O.B 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501

    Phone: +972-8-647-2268
    Fax: +972-8-647-2941
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. David Albouy, 2009. "The Unequal Geographic Burden of Federal Taxation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(4), pages 635-667, 08.
    2. Richard W. Blundell & Martin Browning & Ian A. Crawford, 2003. "Nonparametric Engel Curves and Revealed Preference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 205-240, January.
    3. Henderson, J V, 1974. "The Sizes and Types of Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(4), pages 640-656, September.
    4. Hochman, Oded, 1981. "Land rents, optimal taxation and local fiscal independence in an economy with local public goods," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 59-85, February.
    5. Small, Kenneth A & Rosen, Harvey S, 1981. "Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 105-130, January.
    6. Hanemann, W Michael, 1991. "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 635-647, June.
    7. Chipman, John S & Moore, James C, 1980. "Compensating Variation, Consumer's Surplus, and Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 933-949, December.
    8. Hausman, Jerry A, 1981. "Exact Consumer's Surplus and Deadweight Loss," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(4), pages 662-676, September.
    9. Willig, Robert D, 1976. "Consumer's Surplus without Apology," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(4), pages 589-597, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:1213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Aamer Abu-Qarn)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.