IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdr/borrec/530.html

La economía del cambio climático y la opción amazónica

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Gustavo Cano

Abstract

El cambio climático es una realidad inequívoca. Sus impactos en el mediano y el largo plazo constituyen la más grave amenaza para la supervivencia de las próximas generaciones. Y en el corto plazo, los países en vía de desarrollo, que en su mayoría se encuentran en el trópico y por tanto experimentan las más altas temperaturas, además de contar con economías fuertemente dependientes de la agricultura, son los más expuestos a los potenciales daños provocados por el fenómeno, a pesar de su mínima contribución a las principales causas del mismo, o sea la emisión de los denominados gases de efecto invernadero provenientes del uso de los combustibles fósiles. Desde el ángulo de la ciencia económica, el cambio climático constituye la más pronunciada falla del mercado en la historia de la humanidad. Por tanto, la forma más eficaz de emprender desde ahora su corrección debe ser a través de mecanismos del propio mercado, de suerte que, dentro del marco de la teoría de las externalidades de Pigou, fundamentalmente por intermedio de medidas de índole fiscal, sus costos - y sus beneficios - se reflejen en los precios de los bienes y servicios. Específicamente un sistema combinado de ‘topes y comercio’ y de gravámenes a las emisiones de flujos de carbono, inspirado en la experiencia pionera de la Unión Europea tanto en el ámbito de la llamada reforma fiscal ecológica como en el mercado de los créditos de carbono, y adoptado a nivel global, debe ser el primer paso en esa dirección. Igualmente es urgente otorgarle a la reducción de la deforestación - la mayor fuente de las emisiones en las áreas tropicales - y a la reforestación y la forestación según el caso, el reconocimiento como actividades elegibles para el otorgamiento de créditos de carbono. Y, en el caso de Colombia, en asocio de sus vecinos de la Amazonia, donde se encuentra el 40 por ciento del bosque tropical húmedo que aún queda en el planeta, la formulación y ejecución de un megaproyecto en dicha macro-región, a fin de someterlo a la consideración de la próxima cumbre de las Naciones Unidas sobre el cambio climático a finales del 2009 en Conpenhage, como el primero y más grande avance del mundo en tal materia.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Gustavo Cano, 2008. "La economía del cambio climático y la opción amazónica," Borradores de Economia 530, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdr:borrec:530
    DOI: 10.32468/be.530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32468/be.530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32468/be.530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tavoni, Massimo & Sohngen, Brent & Bosetti, Valentina, 2007. "Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5346-5353, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Popp, Alexander & Krause, Michael & Dietrich, Jan Philipp & Lotze-Campen, Hermann & Leimbach, Marian & Beringer, Tim & Bauer, Nico, 2012. "Additional CO2 emissions from land use change — Forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 64-70.
    2. De Cian, Enrica & Favero, Alice, 2010. "Fairness, Credibility and Effectiveness in the Copenhagen Accord: An Economic Assessment," Sustainable Development Papers 59478, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Valentina Bosetti & Carlo Carraro & Massimo Tavoni, 2008. "Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed?," Working Papers 2008.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Skidmore, Samuel & Santos, Paulo & Leimona, Beria, 2012. "Seeing REDD: A Microeconomic Analysis of Carbon Sequestration in Indonesia," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126688, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Rosa, Renato & Simas, Constança & Ataíde, Rodrigo & Soares, Paula & Tomé, Margarida, 2024. "Optimal forest management under climate change variability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Kim, Yoon Hyung, . "A Comparison of Global Timber Models," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 34(3), pages 1-13.
    7. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    8. Sedjo, Roger A. & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Carbon Credits for Avoided Deforestation," RFF Working Paper Series dp-07-47, Resources for the Future.
    9. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn & Brent Sohngen, 2017. "Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 195-206, September.
    10. Majah-Leah V. Ravago & James A. Roumasset, 2015. "Rethinking Baselines: An Efficiency-based Approash to Better REDD+ Governance," Working Papers 201515, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    11. Hou, Guolong & Delang, Claudio O. & Lu, Xixi & Olschewski, Roland, 2020. "Optimizing rotation periods of forest plantations: The effects of carbon accounting regimes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Asbjørn Aaheim & Rajiv Chaturvedi & Anitha Sagadevan, 2011. "Integrated modelling approaches to analysis of climate change impacts on forests and forest management," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 247-266, February.
    13. Ding, Helen & Silvestri, Silvia & Chiabai, Aline & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., 2010. "A Hybrid Approach to the Valuation of Climate Change Effects on Ecosystem Services: Evidence from the European Forests," Sustainable Development Papers 61373, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. García, Jorge H. & Orlov, Anton & Aaheim, Asbjørn, 2018. "Negative leakage: The key role of forest management regimes," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 8-13.
    15. Lauri, Pekka & Havlík, Petr & Kindermann, Georg & Forsell, Nicklas & Böttcher, Hannes & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "Woody biomass energy potential in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 19-31.
    16. Renato Rosa & Clara Costa Duarte & Maria A. Cunha-e-Sá, 2009. "The Role of Forests as Carbon Sinks: Land-Use and Carbon Accounting," Working Papers 2009.61, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    17. Favero, Alice & Mendelsohn, Robert & Sohngen, Brent, "undated". "Carbon Storage and Bioenergy: Using Forests for Climate Mitigation," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 232215, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    18. Stefanie Engel & Charles Palmer, 2008. "“Painting the Forest REDD?” Prospects for Mitigating Climate Change Through Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation," IED Working paper 08-03, IED Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich.
    19. Latta, Gregory S. & Adams, Darius M. & Bell, Kathleen P. & Kline, Jeffrey D., 2016. "Evaluating land-use and private forest management responses to a potential forest carbon offset sales program in western Oregon (USA)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-8.
    20. Ovando, Paola & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2009. "Land use and carbon mitigation in Europe: A survey of the potentials of different alternatives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 992-1003, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdr:borrec:530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Clorith Angélica Bahos Olivera (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brcgvco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.