IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en16160.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Worldwide effects of climate change education on the cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors of schoolchildren and their entourage. A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Marius BOTTIN
  • Ana Beatriz PIZARRO
  • Sara CADAVID
  • Luisa RAMIREZ
  • Sergio BARBOSA
  • Juan Gabriel OCAMPO-PALACIO
  • Benjamin QUESADA

Abstract

Climate change is a pressing global issue, and educating young generations about its causes, consequences, and potential solutions is crucial for fostering sustainable practices; mitigating and adapting to its impacts. Despite many efforts, the effects of climate change education on the cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors of schoolchildren and their surrounding communities, and the kind of interventions that are more effective for different populations and settings, are still poorly known. We conducted a systematic review encompassing a detailed qualitative and quantitative analysis of studies published until 2023, in 13 databases and five different languages, focusing on the impact of climate change education interventions targeting schoolchildren aged 5 to 19 years and their entourages. A rigorous search strategy resulted in a final selection of 146 articles from diverse geographical locations, educational frameworks, and intervention and assessment methodologies. Findings from the systematic review shed light on a highly dynamic body of research and educational practices, with a high diversity of original theoretical and practical strategies and analysis frameworks. Moreover, most documents (>80%) showed positive effects of the described interventions for the cognitive, attitudinal, or behavioral outcomes they analyzed. The cognition outcomes (knowledge and awareness) were clearer and more predominant than the effects on emotions and intent (attitudes) or habits and actions (behavior), which illustrates the so-called knowledge-behavior gap. We draw an overview of research and educational practices in climate change and report the efficient and innovative practices (e.g., intergenerational learning, student-centered pedagogical strategies) when the literature permits it. Competition (vs. collaboration) & fear/anger (vs. hope) emotions dampen positive outcomes for climate change behaviors while local, personally relevant, and transversal interventions or fostering strong links to nature, give promising positive outcomes. However, we highlight a probable publication bias, i.e., researchers and journals tend to preferentially publish original interventions showing positive effects as opposed to negative or null results. Therefore, for climate change education to become the motor of positive change that we hope for future generations, it appears crucial that the actors of this field strengthen the CCE community of practices (national curriculum, materials, and teachers’ training), report more systematically all context-specific educational intervention results and use a more common language in their evaluations of educational practice outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius BOTTIN & Ana Beatriz PIZARRO & Sara CADAVID & Luisa RAMIREZ & Sergio BARBOSA & Juan Gabriel OCAMPO-PALACIO & Benjamin QUESADA, 2023. "Worldwide effects of climate change education on the cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors of schoolchildren and their entourage. A systematic review," Working Paper 31da0f76-4d0c-4c12-9484-f, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en16160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2023-11-04-40-18/Worldwide-effects-of-climate-change-education.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sifan Hu & Jin Chen, 2016. "Place-based inter-generational communication on local climate improves adolescents’ perceptions and willingness to mitigate climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 425-438, October.
    2. Veronika Deisenrieder & Susanne Kubisch & Lars Keller & Johann Stötter, 2020. "Bridging the Action Gap by Democratizing Climate Change Education—The Case of k.i.d.Z.21 in the Context of Fridays for Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. ChiChing Liu & Alan T. Linde & I. Selwyn Sacks, 2009. "Erratum: Slow earthquakes triggered by typhoons," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7252), pages 292-292, July.
    4. ChiChing Liu & Alan T. Linde & I. Selwyn Sacks, 2009. "Slow earthquakes triggered by typhoons," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7248), pages 833-836, June.
    5. Abul Hasnat Milton & Mirza Afreen Fatima Lusha & Wayne Smith & Md Bayzidur Rahman & Md Iqbal Kabir, 2015. "Child Centred Approach to Climate Change and Health Adaptation through Schools in Bangladesh: A Cluster Randomised Intervention Trial," Working Papers id:7682, eSocialSciences.
    6. Danielle F. Lawson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & M. Nils Peterson & Sarah J. Carrier & Renee L. Strnad & Erin Seekamp, 2019. "Children can foster climate change concern among their parents," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 458-462, June.
    7. Xueqi Wang & Jin Chen, 2022. "Fear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karel Nepraš & Tereza Strejčková & Roman Kroufek, 2022. "Climate Change Education in Primary and Lower Secondary Education: Systematic Review Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Vafadarnikjoo, Amin & Tavana, Madjid & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos & Botelho, Tiago, 2022. "A socio-economic and environmental vulnerability assessment model with causal relationships in electric power supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    4. Nathaniel Geiger & Bryan McLaughlin & John Velez, 2021. "Not all boomers: temporal orientation explains inter- and intra-cultural variability in the link between age and climate engagement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Sandra Parth & Maximilian Schickl & Lars Keller & Johann Stoetter, 2020. "Quality Child–Parent Relationships and Their Impact on Intergenerational Learning and Multiplier Effects in Climate Change Education. Are We Bridging the Knowledge–Action Gap?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. A. Lee Hannah & Danielle Christine Rhubart, 2020. "Teacher perceptions of state standards and climate change pedagogy: opportunities and barriers for implementing consensus-informed instruction on climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 377-392, February.
    8. Carlie D. Trott, 2021. "Youth-Led Climate Change Action: Multi-Level Effects on Children, Families, and Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Florian Hanke & Jens Lowitzsch, 2020. "Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.
    10. Jiawen Cao & Jin Chen, 2021. "The Impact of an Authoritarian Personality on Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Air Pollution Mitigation through Interactions with Social Norms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Enzo Ferrari & Anne-Marie Ballegeer & Diego Corrochano & Miguel Ángel Fuertes & Pablo Herrero Teijón & María Laura Delgado Martín & Santiago Andrés Sánchez & Camilo Ruiz, 2024. "Improvement of attitudes and skills using a MOOC about the basic science of climate change," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Bruce Tranter, 2021. "Climate Change Knowledge and Political Identity in Australia," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    13. Lindgren, Samantha, 2024. "Sociocultural determinants of electric cooking in rural Namibia: Recommendations for youth and educational approaches to implementation strategy and policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Nicola Scafetta & Adriano Mazzarella, 2015. "Spectral coherence between climate oscillations and the M ≥ 7 earthquake historical worldwide record," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1807-1829, April.
    15. Lisa Richter-Beuschel & Susanne Bögeholz, 2019. "Student Teachers’ Knowledge to Enable Problem-Solving for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Thomas, Melanee & DeCillia, Brooks & Santos, John B. & Thorlakson, Lori, 2022. "Great expectations: Public opinion about energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Xueqi Wang & Jin Chen, 2022. "Fear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Rotaris, Lucia & Del Missier, Fabio & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2023. "Comparing children and parental preferences for active commuting to school. A focus on Italian middle-school students," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Chanmaly Chhun & Takeshi Tsuji, 2020. "Pore Pressure Analysis for Distinguishing Earthquakes Induced by CO 2 Injection from Natural Earthquakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Md. Nazirul Islam Sarker & Yang Peng & Most. Nilufa Khatun & G. M. Monirul Alam & Roger C. Shouse & Md. Ruhul Amin, 2022. "Climate finance governance in hazard prone riverine islands in Bangladesh: pathway for promoting climate resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1115-1132, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en16160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.