IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/2226.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey D Sachs
  • Salim S Abdool Karim
  • Lara Aknin
  • Joseph Allen
  • Kirsten Brosbol
  • Francesca Colombo
  • Gabriela Cuevas Barron
  • Maria Fernanda Espinosa
  • Vitor Gaspar
  • Alejandro Gaviria
  • Andy Haines
  • Peter J Hotez
  • Phoebe Koundouri
  • Felipe Larrain Bascunan
  • Jong-Koo Lee
  • Muhammad Ali Pate
  • Gabriela Ramos
  • K Srinath Reddy
  • Ismail Serageldin
  • John Thwaites
  • Vaira Vike-Freiberga
  • Chen Wang
  • Miriam Khamadi Were
  • Lan Xue
  • Chandrika Bahadur
  • Maria Elena Bottazzi
  • Chris Bullen
  • George Laryea-Adjei
  • Yanis Ben Amor
  • Ozge Karadag
  • Guillaume Lafortune
  • Emma Torres
  • Lauren Barredo
  • Juliana G E Bartels
  • Neena Joshi
  • Margaret Hellard
  • Uyen Kim Huynh
  • Shweta Khandelwal
  • Jeffrey V Lazarus
  • Susan Michie

Abstract

As of May 31, 2022, there were 6.9 million reported deaths and 17.2 million estimated deaths from COVID-19, as reported by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME; throughout the report, we rely on IHME estimates of infections and deaths; note that the IHME gives an estimated range, and we refer to the mean estimate). This staggering death toll is both a profound tragedy and a massive global failure at multiple levels. Too many governments have failed to adhere to basic norms of institutional rationality and transparency, too many people often influenced by misinformation-have disrespected and protested against basic public health precautions, and the world's major powers have failed to collaborate to control the pandemic. The multiple failures of international cooperation include (1) the lack of timely notification of the initial outbreak of COVID-19; (2) costly delays in acknowledging the crucial airborne exposure pathway of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and in implementing appropriate measures at national and global levels to slow the spread of the virus; (3) the lack of coordination among countries regarding suppression strategies; (4) the failure of governments to examine evidence and adopt best practices for controlling the pandemic and managing economic and social spillovers from other countries; (5) the shortfall of global funding for low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), as classified by the World Bank; (6) the failure to ensure adequate global supplies and equitable distribution of key commodities-including protective gear, diagnostics, medicines, medical devices, and vaccines-especially for LMICs; (7) the lack of timely, accurate, and systematic data on infections, deaths, viral variants, health system responses, and indirect health consequences; (8) the poor enforcement of appropriate levels of biosafety regulations in the lead-up to the pandemic, raising the possibility of a laboratory-related outbreak; (9) the failure to combat systematic disinformation; and (10) the lack of global and national safety nets to protect populations experiencing vulnerability. This Commission report aims to contribute to a new era of multilateral cooperation based on strong UN institutions to reduce the dangers of COVID-19, forestall the next pandemic, and enable the world to achieve the agreed goals of sustainable development, human rights, and peace that governments are committed to pursue as members of the UN. We address this Commission report to the UN member states, the UN agencies and multilateral institutions, and multilateral processes such as the G20 and the G7. Our aim is to propose guideposts for strengthening the multilateral system to address global emergencies and to achieve sustainable development. In issuing this report, we commend the excellent work of many important international studies that have preceded our own, most notably those from the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response and the G20 High-Level Independent Panel on Financing the Global Commons on Pandemic Preparedness and Response. Section 1 of this Commission report provides a conceptual framework for understanding pandemics. Section 2 provides an annotated chronology of the COVID-19 pandemic and thematic findings regarding several issues. Section 3 presents our policy recommendations, particularly around multilateral cooperation centred at WHO to address global health crises, and around investments in preparedness for future health crises through strong national health systems and international financing and technology cooperation with the world's lower-income regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey D Sachs & Salim S Abdool Karim & Lara Aknin & Joseph Allen & Kirsten Brosbol & Francesca Colombo & Gabriela Cuevas Barron & Maria Fernanda Espinosa & Vitor Gaspar & Alejandro Gaviria & Andy Ha, 2022. "The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic," DEOS Working Papers 2226, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/2022.Lancet..pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gearhart, Richard & Michieka, Nyakundi & Anders, Anne, 2023. "The effectiveness of COVID deaths to COVID policies: A robust conditional approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 376-394.
    2. Didier Wernli & Lucas Böttcher & Flore Vanackere & Yuliya Kaspiarovich & Maria Masood & Nicolas Levrat, 2023. "Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 207-228, May.
    3. Gert G. Wagner, 2022. "Grenzen und Fortschritte indikatorengestützter Politik am Beispiel der Corona-Pandemie [Limitations and progress of indicator-based policy – The case of the Corona pandemic]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 16(3), pages 171-187, December.
    4. Eduardo L. Krüger & Anderson Spohr Nedel, 2022. "Investigating the Relationship between Climate and Hospital Admissions for Respiratory Diseases before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Hadjisotiriou, Sophie & Marchau, Vincent & Walker, Warren & Rikkert, Marcel Olde, 2023. "Decision making under deep uncertainty for pandemic policy planning," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. de Graaff, Bert & Huizenga, Sabrina & van de Bovenkamp, Hester & Bal, Roland, 2023. "Framing the pandemic: Multiplying “crises” in Dutch healthcare governance during the emerging COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Patricia Dudgeon & Jemma R. Collova & Kate Derry & Stewart Sutherland, 2023. "Lessons Learned during a Rapidly Evolving COVID-19 Pandemic: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-Led Mental Health and Wellbeing Responses Are Key," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Pablo N. Perez-Guzman & Edward Knock & Natsuko Imai & Thomas Rawson & Yasin Elmaci & Joana Alcada & Lilith K. Whittles & Divya Thekke Kanapram & Raphael Sonabend & Katy A. M. Gaythorpe & Wes Hinsley &, 2023. "Epidemiological drivers of transmissibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in England," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Adam Altmejd & Joacim Rocklöv & Jonas Wallin, 2023. "Nowcasting COVID-19 Statistics Reported with Delay: A Case-Study of Sweden and the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Jessica E. Hughes & James D. Sauer & Aaron Drummond & Laura E. Brumby & Matthew A. Palmer, 2023. "Endorsement of scientific inquiry promotes better evaluation of climate policy evidence," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(6), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.